<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;Disgusted with All of Them&#8217;: Code Pink to Take Aim at Dems in &#8216;08</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.breitbart.tv/we-felt-betrayed-code-pink-to-take-aim-at-dems-in-08/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.breitbart.tv/we-felt-betrayed-code-pink-to-take-aim-at-dems-in-08/</link>
	<description>Breitbart.tv</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:05:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SoCal Patriot</title>
		<link>http://www.breitbart.tv/we-felt-betrayed-code-pink-to-take-aim-at-dems-in-08/comment-page-2/#comment-58084</link>
		<dc:creator>SoCal Patriot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 05:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breitbart.tv/?p=13234#comment-58084</guid>
		<description>Yeah, that&#039;s what I thought. :D

National poll:
http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1402

&quot;Republicans:
Rudy: 23% (down from 29%) 
Huckabee: 22% (up from 11%)
Romney: 16% (up from 9%)
Thompson: 13% (down from 15%) 
mccain: 12% (up from 9%)
ron &quot;cut and run&quot; paul: 4% (down from 5%)

democrats:
hillary: 40% (up from 38%)
obama: 32% (up from 27%)
edwards: 13% (same)
richardson: 3% (same)
biden: 3% (up from 2%)
kucinich: 2% (same)&quot; 

It&#039;s not hard to see the real candidates nor the fringe whackjobs either...unless you are a nutjob yourself. Like I said before, &quot;the sky is not falling, the conspiracy theory is silly.&quot; ;)

Hope that helps but I doubt it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, that&#8217;s what I thought. <img src='http://www.breitbart.tv/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>National poll:<br />
<a href="http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1402" rel="nofollow">http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1402</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Republicans:<br />
Rudy: 23% (down from 29%)<br />
Huckabee: 22% (up from 11%)<br />
Romney: 16% (up from 9%)<br />
Thompson: 13% (down from 15%)<br />
mccain: 12% (up from 9%)<br />
ron &#8220;cut and run&#8221; paul: 4% (down from 5%)</p>
<p>democrats:<br />
hillary: 40% (up from 38%)<br />
obama: 32% (up from 27%)<br />
edwards: 13% (same)<br />
richardson: 3% (same)<br />
biden: 3% (up from 2%)<br />
kucinich: 2% (same)&#8221; </p>
<p>It&#8217;s not hard to see the real candidates nor the fringe whackjobs either&#8230;unless you are a nutjob yourself. Like I said before, &#8220;the sky is not falling, the conspiracy theory is silly.&#8221; <img src='http://www.breitbart.tv/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Hope that helps but I doubt it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SoCal Patriot</title>
		<link>http://www.breitbart.tv/we-felt-betrayed-code-pink-to-take-aim-at-dems-in-08/comment-page-2/#comment-56114</link>
		<dc:creator>SoCal Patriot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 07:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breitbart.tv/?p=13234#comment-56114</guid>
		<description>WyoWill&#039;s new name:
&quot;Iâ€™ve been TRYING to make this about issues!!! You do not seem willing to give any facts or even opinions about anything other than your opinion about the intelligence of people who support a given position and/or candidate.&quot;

You lying, two-faced SOB. You&#039;ve *been* trying to make this about *me* and *my* opinion of *your* candidate. I did give facts. The fact is, he&#039;s a loser, look at the polls. The only support he has is from worthless &quot;people,&quot; like you, who are deluded. 
I said he has zero chance: fact.
I said he was a &quot;cut and run&quot; coward: fact.
I said he &quot;blames America&quot; for 9/11: fact.
I said code pink was disgusting (like supporters of Ron &quot;cut and run&quot; Paul): fact.
I said you were a two faced hypocrite for whining and moaning about &quot;name calling&quot; while you do the same thing yourself: fact.
I said that democrats (all of them) are worse than Rudy: fact.
I said 007 and all of the other names he used was an idiot who busted himself by also using my name: fact.
I said racists were scum: fact.
I said even money won&#039;t help Ron &quot;blame America&quot; Paul.

I&#039;m sure there were other facts mixed in with my opinions too but but just this short list shows that you don&#039;t know wtf you&#039;re talking about. 

Now your &quot;opinion,&quot; that a traitor would be the perfect president, says  much more about your grasp on &quot;facts&quot; than mine. You and 007, two peas in a Ron &quot;cut and run&quot; Paul pod.


&quot;25 vs 13 posts were only to set up facts, not to imply you are not allowed to post 25 or 52 times for that matter. Post awayâ€¦&quot;
No, you were trying to imply that because I have a lot of posts (like 007 tried) that it means something. I will post when I like, good luck with that.


&quot;I will plead guilty to supporting Ron Paul but modesty and common sense prohibits me from comparing myself to Dr Paul.&quot;
Supporting a scumbag traitor isn&#039;t a crime but maybe it should be. You do have to own it, because you said it, though.


&quot;I do not believe I could POSSIBLY prove my point any better than you just did. Thank you. You may want to read it just to see what I am trying to sayâ€¦ and more precisely what YOU just said.&quot;

I&#039;ve read enough of your crap to see you&#039;ve been trying to make this about me because you&#039;re bitter than your candidate is a loser and I called it like I saw it.


&quot;You may want to think about that yourselfâ€¦ No, I guess not.&quot;
Again, retard, you&#039;ll never make this about me. 

Are you 007, you&#039;re not that bright? I&#039;m starting to think that WyoWill (etc) is just another name used by 007.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WyoWill&#8217;s new name:<br />
&#8220;Iâ€™ve been TRYING to make this about issues!!! You do not seem willing to give any facts or even opinions about anything other than your opinion about the intelligence of people who support a given position and/or candidate.&#8221;</p>
<p>You lying, two-faced SOB. You&#8217;ve *been* trying to make this about *me* and *my* opinion of *your* candidate. I did give facts. The fact is, he&#8217;s a loser, look at the polls. The only support he has is from worthless &#8220;people,&#8221; like you, who are deluded.<br />
I said he has zero chance: fact.<br />
I said he was a &#8220;cut and run&#8221; coward: fact.<br />
I said he &#8220;blames America&#8221; for 9/11: fact.<br />
I said code pink was disgusting (like supporters of Ron &#8220;cut and run&#8221; Paul): fact.<br />
I said you were a two faced hypocrite for whining and moaning about &#8220;name calling&#8221; while you do the same thing yourself: fact.<br />
I said that democrats (all of them) are worse than Rudy: fact.<br />
I said 007 and all of the other names he used was an idiot who busted himself by also using my name: fact.<br />
I said racists were scum: fact.<br />
I said even money won&#8217;t help Ron &#8220;blame America&#8221; Paul.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure there were other facts mixed in with my opinions too but but just this short list shows that you don&#8217;t know wtf you&#8217;re talking about. </p>
<p>Now your &#8220;opinion,&#8221; that a traitor would be the perfect president, says  much more about your grasp on &#8220;facts&#8221; than mine. You and 007, two peas in a Ron &#8220;cut and run&#8221; Paul pod.</p>
<p>&#8220;25 vs 13 posts were only to set up facts, not to imply you are not allowed to post 25 or 52 times for that matter. Post awayâ€¦&#8221;<br />
No, you were trying to imply that because I have a lot of posts (like 007 tried) that it means something. I will post when I like, good luck with that.</p>
<p>&#8220;I will plead guilty to supporting Ron Paul but modesty and common sense prohibits me from comparing myself to Dr Paul.&#8221;<br />
Supporting a scumbag traitor isn&#8217;t a crime but maybe it should be. You do have to own it, because you said it, though.</p>
<p>&#8220;I do not believe I could POSSIBLY prove my point any better than you just did. Thank you. You may want to read it just to see what I am trying to sayâ€¦ and more precisely what YOU just said.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve read enough of your crap to see you&#8217;ve been trying to make this about me because you&#8217;re bitter than your candidate is a loser and I called it like I saw it.</p>
<p>&#8220;You may want to think about that yourselfâ€¦ No, I guess not.&#8221;<br />
Again, retard, you&#8217;ll never make this about me. </p>
<p>Are you 007, you&#8217;re not that bright? I&#8217;m starting to think that WyoWill (etc) is just another name used by 007.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwz@bresnan.net</title>
		<link>http://www.breitbart.tv/we-felt-betrayed-code-pink-to-take-aim-at-dems-in-08/comment-page-2/#comment-55834</link>
		<dc:creator>jwz@bresnan.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 02:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breitbart.tv/?p=13234#comment-55834</guid>
		<description>Perfect.  

I&#039;ve been TRYING to make this about issues!!! You do not seem willing to give any facts or even opinions about anything other than your opinion about the intelligence of people who support a given position and/or candidate. PLEASE give me reasons for your opinions on topics other than your personal opinion of me.  I think that is a reasonable request, but as yet I have not seen evidence that you are capable of fulfilling such a request... or is it that you have no interest in it?

 25 vs 13 posts were only to set up facts, not to imply you are not allowed to post 25 or 52 times for that matter.  Post away...

I will plead guilty to supporting Ron Paul but modesty and common sense prohibits me from comparing myself to Dr Paul.  Dr Paul is a very learned Physician and 20 year US Congressman.  He has studied topics dealing with monetary systems, history of nations and their downfall, the US Constitution and Congressional, Presidential and Judicial powers, etc., etc., etc..  I don&#039;t know about you, but I simply do not measure up to that.  

&gt;&gt;&gt;&quot;The rest of your idiocy I didnâ€™t even bother to read, you CANâ€™T make this about me, boy. Grow up, punk&quot;

I do not believe I could POSSIBLY prove my point any better than you just did.  Thank you.  You may want to read it just to see what I am trying to say... and more precisely what YOU just said.

I am willing to accept the premise that I need to increase my knowledge and awareness of all the issues.  I concede the point that I may be wrong.  If I refused to consider I may be wrong, I could never learn anything.  You may want to think about that yourself... No, I guess not.

Aside from these verbal jabs, my sarcasm and the decidedly negative tone this has taken on, I really do wish you a Wonderful Christmas.  Take care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perfect.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been TRYING to make this about issues!!! You do not seem willing to give any facts or even opinions about anything other than your opinion about the intelligence of people who support a given position and/or candidate. PLEASE give me reasons for your opinions on topics other than your personal opinion of me.  I think that is a reasonable request, but as yet I have not seen evidence that you are capable of fulfilling such a request&#8230; or is it that you have no interest in it?</p>
<p> 25 vs 13 posts were only to set up facts, not to imply you are not allowed to post 25 or 52 times for that matter.  Post away&#8230;</p>
<p>I will plead guilty to supporting Ron Paul but modesty and common sense prohibits me from comparing myself to Dr Paul.  Dr Paul is a very learned Physician and 20 year US Congressman.  He has studied topics dealing with monetary systems, history of nations and their downfall, the US Constitution and Congressional, Presidential and Judicial powers, etc., etc., etc..  I don&#8217;t know about you, but I simply do not measure up to that.  </p>
<p>&gt;&gt;&gt;&#8221;The rest of your idiocy I didnâ€™t even bother to read, you CANâ€™T make this about me, boy. Grow up, punk&#8221;</p>
<p>I do not believe I could POSSIBLY prove my point any better than you just did.  Thank you.  You may want to read it just to see what I am trying to say&#8230; and more precisely what YOU just said.</p>
<p>I am willing to accept the premise that I need to increase my knowledge and awareness of all the issues.  I concede the point that I may be wrong.  If I refused to consider I may be wrong, I could never learn anything.  You may want to think about that yourself&#8230; No, I guess not.</p>
<p>Aside from these verbal jabs, my sarcasm and the decidedly negative tone this has taken on, I really do wish you a Wonderful Christmas.  Take care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SoCal Patriot</title>
		<link>http://www.breitbart.tv/we-felt-betrayed-code-pink-to-take-aim-at-dems-in-08/comment-page-2/#comment-55694</link>
		<dc:creator>SoCal Patriot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 23:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breitbart.tv/?p=13234#comment-55694</guid>
		<description>WyoWill:
&quot;I have roughly 13 posts so far, SoCal has roughly 25.&quot;

I know you&#039;re desperate to make this about me, retard, but you&#039;re the whiner complaining about name calling while doing it yourself. The number of posts mean nothing AND some of the post under my name were from that otehr mental midget Ron &quot;Blame America&quot; Paul supporter that though he was clever. You&#039;re a loser, just like Ron &quot;cut and run&quot; Paul. :D

The FACT of the matter is you&#039;re supporting a loser because birds of a feather stick together.

The rest of your idiocy I didn&#039;t even bother to read, you CAN&#039;T make this about me, boy. Grow up, punk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WyoWill:<br />
&#8220;I have roughly 13 posts so far, SoCal has roughly 25.&#8221;</p>
<p>I know you&#8217;re desperate to make this about me, retard, but you&#8217;re the whiner complaining about name calling while doing it yourself. The number of posts mean nothing AND some of the post under my name were from that otehr mental midget Ron &#8220;Blame America&#8221; Paul supporter that though he was clever. You&#8217;re a loser, just like Ron &#8220;cut and run&#8221; Paul. <img src='http://www.breitbart.tv/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>The FACT of the matter is you&#8217;re supporting a loser because birds of a feather stick together.</p>
<p>The rest of your idiocy I didn&#8217;t even bother to read, you CAN&#8217;T make this about me, boy. Grow up, punk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WyoWill</title>
		<link>http://www.breitbart.tv/we-felt-betrayed-code-pink-to-take-aim-at-dems-in-08/comment-page-2/#comment-55574</link>
		<dc:creator>WyoWill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 12:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breitbart.tv/?p=13234#comment-55574</guid>
		<description>A simple review of this thread reveals the following:

I have roughly 13 posts so far, SoCal has roughly 25.  A quick count (and I could have miscounted) shows that SoCal has used the following insults:
Traitor(s): 4 times
Coward or Cowardice: once
Leveled the charge of Anti-American: once
&quot; &quot;: Pacifist: 3 times
Retard, Retarded, fool etc: 9 times
Nutjob or Wackjob: 8 times
Conspiracy charge: twice
Fringe: 4
Joke: 3
Delusional: 3
general insults: a min of 16
and referred to a 10 term Congressman, Physician, Strict Constitutionalist who continues to point out where our policy and actions as a country differ from the advise of the Founding Fathers and the US Constitution as Ron &quot;Cut and Run&quot; Paul 16 times.

SoCal did actually list facts that I could check out on two occasions and they proved to be accurate. He referred to an oath he took to the constitution onceâ€¦ (I also took an oath to protect the Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic.)  The rest of his posts were opinions, which are well and good if they were about eventsâ€¦ but his opinions dealt mainly with the above insults.  Not much constructive there. 
 
I do encourage SoCal to state the Truth and Facts.  I do not understand his last accusation.  I welcome TRUTH and FACTSâ€¦ he gave me 2 such things in 25 posts.  The rest were things that I took him at his word (his service to out country, the oath he took to protect the constitution.) or they were insults or misinformed accusations. 

I have been charged with being as negative and such as SoCal...

I attempted to be rational and reasonable in my effort to share my concerns about our country and my support for Dr Paul.  I stated I wished to create more light than heat in this discussion. I will admit I failed.  

But I did list facts that can be checked out with ease by anyone able to negotiate the web well enough to find this post.  A total of 30 references were made listing facts about the financial crisis, national debt, rate of increasing debt, Constitutional Authority and Responsibility of Congress, listing historical events and dates, Listed and defended Dr Paul&#039;s stated positions (go check them out) etc... I also thanked SoCal and his Father and uncles for their service to the country and I sincerely mean it. 

Also included were several of my personal rants consisting of sarcasm and opinion, mixed with the above references.  I will admit that I may be wrong in my labels of Neo-cons (Neo- Conservatives)and RINOS (Republican In Name Only)and I will defer to SoCal and others to actually define those terms.  I may have wrongly attributed those actions of SoCal as those of a Neo-Con or a RINO.  As far at the &quot;Sheep&quot; reference, if you look, I refer to myself as one in both 2000 and 2004.  

I will defend my right to identify my own misguided behavior and reasoning as well as those who share or shared the same views, ideas and misconceptions.  My last two rants that aggravated SoCal so much were the pot calling the kettle black.  I will be the pot or the kettle, you can decide which... If that shoe pinches a little too much for comfort, spend some time and check your own ideas.

Other than that, I will rest on Janâ€™s opinion on  Dec 13th @ 1:59 AM and take BTBâ€™s view (well half of it anyway;-) on his Dec 13th post also. I know this mess between SoCal and I has taken over this open exchange of ideas.  I apologize to all. 

Take care everyone.  Have a Merry Christmas and a Blessed New Year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A simple review of this thread reveals the following:</p>
<p>I have roughly 13 posts so far, SoCal has roughly 25.  A quick count (and I could have miscounted) shows that SoCal has used the following insults:<br />
Traitor(s): 4 times<br />
Coward or Cowardice: once<br />
Leveled the charge of Anti-American: once<br />
&#8221; &#8220;: Pacifist: 3 times<br />
Retard, Retarded, fool etc: 9 times<br />
Nutjob or Wackjob: 8 times<br />
Conspiracy charge: twice<br />
Fringe: 4<br />
Joke: 3<br />
Delusional: 3<br />
general insults: a min of 16<br />
and referred to a 10 term Congressman, Physician, Strict Constitutionalist who continues to point out where our policy and actions as a country differ from the advise of the Founding Fathers and the US Constitution as Ron &#8220;Cut and Run&#8221; Paul 16 times.</p>
<p>SoCal did actually list facts that I could check out on two occasions and they proved to be accurate. He referred to an oath he took to the constitution onceâ€¦ (I also took an oath to protect the Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic.)  The rest of his posts were opinions, which are well and good if they were about eventsâ€¦ but his opinions dealt mainly with the above insults.  Not much constructive there. </p>
<p>I do encourage SoCal to state the Truth and Facts.  I do not understand his last accusation.  I welcome TRUTH and FACTSâ€¦ he gave me 2 such things in 25 posts.  The rest were things that I took him at his word (his service to out country, the oath he took to protect the constitution.) or they were insults or misinformed accusations. </p>
<p>I have been charged with being as negative and such as SoCal&#8230;</p>
<p>I attempted to be rational and reasonable in my effort to share my concerns about our country and my support for Dr Paul.  I stated I wished to create more light than heat in this discussion. I will admit I failed.  </p>
<p>But I did list facts that can be checked out with ease by anyone able to negotiate the web well enough to find this post.  A total of 30 references were made listing facts about the financial crisis, national debt, rate of increasing debt, Constitutional Authority and Responsibility of Congress, listing historical events and dates, Listed and defended Dr Paul&#8217;s stated positions (go check them out) etc&#8230; I also thanked SoCal and his Father and uncles for their service to the country and I sincerely mean it. </p>
<p>Also included were several of my personal rants consisting of sarcasm and opinion, mixed with the above references.  I will admit that I may be wrong in my labels of Neo-cons (Neo- Conservatives)and RINOS (Republican In Name Only)and I will defer to SoCal and others to actually define those terms.  I may have wrongly attributed those actions of SoCal as those of a Neo-Con or a RINO.  As far at the &#8220;Sheep&#8221; reference, if you look, I refer to myself as one in both 2000 and 2004.  </p>
<p>I will defend my right to identify my own misguided behavior and reasoning as well as those who share or shared the same views, ideas and misconceptions.  My last two rants that aggravated SoCal so much were the pot calling the kettle black.  I will be the pot or the kettle, you can decide which&#8230; If that shoe pinches a little too much for comfort, spend some time and check your own ideas.</p>
<p>Other than that, I will rest on Janâ€™s opinion on  Dec 13th @ 1:59 AM and take BTBâ€™s view (well half of it anyway;-) on his Dec 13th post also. I know this mess between SoCal and I has taken over this open exchange of ideas.  I apologize to all. </p>
<p>Take care everyone.  Have a Merry Christmas and a Blessed New Year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SoCal Patriot</title>
		<link>http://www.breitbart.tv/we-felt-betrayed-code-pink-to-take-aim-at-dems-in-08/comment-page-2/#comment-55234</link>
		<dc:creator>SoCal Patriot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 03:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breitbart.tv/?p=13234#comment-55234</guid>
		<description>Look, you POS hypocrite, don&#039;t sit there and whine about names/labels because the nutjob you want elected is a traitor and a fool, when you do the same thing. Why is it bad for me to tell the truth about Ron &quot;cut and run&quot; Paul? Why is it OK for you to use names and labels like &quot;neocon&quot; and &quot;sheepeople&quot; and it&#039;s bad for me? Why are people that aren&#039;t as deluded as you sheeple because they&#039;re smart enough to not vote for a traitor, like &quot;Ron &quot;blame America&quot; Paul? You&#039;re as worthless as he is.

Good luck with your mental midget fantasy, retard....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look, you POS hypocrite, don&#8217;t sit there and whine about names/labels because the nutjob you want elected is a traitor and a fool, when you do the same thing. Why is it bad for me to tell the truth about Ron &#8220;cut and run&#8221; Paul? Why is it OK for you to use names and labels like &#8220;neocon&#8221; and &#8220;sheepeople&#8221; and it&#8217;s bad for me? Why are people that aren&#8217;t as deluded as you sheeple because they&#8217;re smart enough to not vote for a traitor, like &#8220;Ron &#8220;blame America&#8221; Paul? You&#8217;re as worthless as he is.</p>
<p>Good luck with your mental midget fantasy, retard&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WyoWill</title>
		<link>http://www.breitbart.tv/we-felt-betrayed-code-pink-to-take-aim-at-dems-in-08/comment-page-2/#comment-55134</link>
		<dc:creator>WyoWill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 23:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breitbart.tv/?p=13234#comment-55134</guid>
		<description>Right.  Keep telling yourself that and you will be fine.  &quot;SoCal is not the problem... SoCal is NOT the problem... It&#039;s RonPaul who is nuts... always bringing up the damn Constitution!  Who DOES THAT?!?!?  What a wack job!&quot;  

Don&#039;t forget to breath and think happy thoughts.  I think Fox and Friends is on,... you won&#039;t want to miss that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right.  Keep telling yourself that and you will be fine.  &#8220;SoCal is not the problem&#8230; SoCal is NOT the problem&#8230; It&#8217;s RonPaul who is nuts&#8230; always bringing up the damn Constitution!  Who DOES THAT?!?!?  What a wack job!&#8221;  </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t forget to breath and think happy thoughts.  I think Fox and Friends is on,&#8230; you won&#8217;t want to miss that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SoCal Patriot</title>
		<link>http://www.breitbart.tv/we-felt-betrayed-code-pink-to-take-aim-at-dems-in-08/comment-page-2/#comment-55004</link>
		<dc:creator>SoCal Patriot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 16:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breitbart.tv/?p=13234#comment-55004</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s still not about me. I&#039;m not the Ron &quot;cut and run&quot; paul supporter. :D

Bitter much?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s still not about me. I&#8217;m not the Ron &#8220;cut and run&#8221; paul supporter. <img src='http://www.breitbart.tv/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Bitter much?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WyoWill</title>
		<link>http://www.breitbart.tv/we-felt-betrayed-code-pink-to-take-aim-at-dems-in-08/comment-page-2/#comment-54994</link>
		<dc:creator>WyoWill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 15:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breitbart.tv/?p=13234#comment-54994</guid>
		<description>SoCal,

You have won.  Congrats.  This was only a test of your allegiance to the true neo-con philosophy. 

We were concerned that you may be weakening your resolve when confronted with facts and reasoning that are easily confirmed with a little effort, but you overcame this but doing just what we have always asked you to do... 

Simply label opposing views as &quot;wackjob&quot; or &quot;conspiratorial&quot;... Reject any impulse to consider or check assertions made by any opposing view...and continue chanting our mantra &quot;Cut and Run&quot;  &quot;Traitors&quot;  &quot;Sean Hannity is a Great American&quot;.  We will continue to provide you with all the thought and reasoning you will need.  By all means continue to refuse to actually require anything of any politician  who professes to be a conservative.  All that matters is that we continue to rely on Republicans (or reasonable facsimiles thereof) to take care of us.  WELL DONE.

You will continue to get more of what already exists.  Debt (9.3 Trillion and growing at a rate of over 1 million a minute) A falling dollar (the USD has lost 78% of its value to the Canadian Dollar since 2002, to name but one example)  More entitlements we cannot possibly afford and a foreign policy that does not make us safer and puts us further into unrecoverable debt.  It is critical that we confront this argument as traitorous and repeat the phrase &quot;Cut and Run&quot; until the annoying truth spew-er goes away.

Yep, sounds conspiratorial to me.  You are wise to ignore anyone who would waste your time with these facts.  By all means just keep doing what you&#039;ve always done and vote for &#039;leaders&#039; who will continue to promise better ways to take care of you... saving you from the uncomfortable requirement to actually take care of yourself.

POWER TO THE SHEEPEOPLE.  Live long and Flounder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SoCal,</p>
<p>You have won.  Congrats.  This was only a test of your allegiance to the true neo-con philosophy. </p>
<p>We were concerned that you may be weakening your resolve when confronted with facts and reasoning that are easily confirmed with a little effort, but you overcame this but doing just what we have always asked you to do&#8230; </p>
<p>Simply label opposing views as &#8220;wackjob&#8221; or &#8220;conspiratorial&#8221;&#8230; Reject any impulse to consider or check assertions made by any opposing view&#8230;and continue chanting our mantra &#8220;Cut and Run&#8221;  &#8220;Traitors&#8221;  &#8220;Sean Hannity is a Great American&#8221;.  We will continue to provide you with all the thought and reasoning you will need.  By all means continue to refuse to actually require anything of any politician  who professes to be a conservative.  All that matters is that we continue to rely on Republicans (or reasonable facsimiles thereof) to take care of us.  WELL DONE.</p>
<p>You will continue to get more of what already exists.  Debt (9.3 Trillion and growing at a rate of over 1 million a minute) A falling dollar (the USD has lost 78% of its value to the Canadian Dollar since 2002, to name but one example)  More entitlements we cannot possibly afford and a foreign policy that does not make us safer and puts us further into unrecoverable debt.  It is critical that we confront this argument as traitorous and repeat the phrase &#8220;Cut and Run&#8221; until the annoying truth spew-er goes away.</p>
<p>Yep, sounds conspiratorial to me.  You are wise to ignore anyone who would waste your time with these facts.  By all means just keep doing what you&#8217;ve always done and vote for &#8216;leaders&#8217; who will continue to promise better ways to take care of you&#8230; saving you from the uncomfortable requirement to actually take care of yourself.</p>
<p>POWER TO THE SHEEPEOPLE.  Live long and Flounder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SoCal Patriot</title>
		<link>http://www.breitbart.tv/we-felt-betrayed-code-pink-to-take-aim-at-dems-in-08/comment-page-2/#comment-54914</link>
		<dc:creator>SoCal Patriot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 11:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.breitbart.tv/?p=13234#comment-54914</guid>
		<description>Says the Ron &quot;cut and run&quot; Paul supporter. I say it&#039;s a GREAT thing when a traitor like him gets put in his place. I&#039;m OK with Romney, if he stops the neg attack ads. 

There&#039;s always somebody that thinks their way is better. Usually, it&#039;s the losers. I think it shows the system works to keep out the nutjob fringe candidates.

Yes, we need to stop tolerating whackjob conspiracy theorists. There&#039;s no need to take them seriously, just to be PC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Says the Ron &#8220;cut and run&#8221; Paul supporter. I say it&#8217;s a GREAT thing when a traitor like him gets put in his place. I&#8217;m OK with Romney, if he stops the neg attack ads. </p>
<p>There&#8217;s always somebody that thinks their way is better. Usually, it&#8217;s the losers. I think it shows the system works to keep out the nutjob fringe candidates.</p>
<p>Yes, we need to stop tolerating whackjob conspiracy theorists. There&#8217;s no need to take them seriously, just to be PC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

