‘Voodoo Histories’: Fake Moon Landing Conspiracy Theories Still Hold Power

"It would be easier to land on the moon, than to hoax a landing on the moon."
July 4, 2009 at 8:57 am - Sky News
Dateline: London, England
themoonlandingwasnotamyth   July 6th, 2009 - 9:12 am

apparantly conspiracy nut jobs haven’t seen the Mythbusters special where there clearly and consistently debunk every “fact” in the conspiracy playbook.

http://mythbustersresults.com/episode-104-nasa-moon-landing

daisinjon   July 6th, 2009 - 11:25 am

If you look at the evidence, or lack of it, the cautious conclusion might be: More evidence is needed before concluding the moon landing happened. On US radio in 2008, a female astronaut said, and I paraphrase: “It would take us 20 years to land again on the moon as the technology has been lost.” Lost? Like WWII technology was “lost?” Rather odd statement, no?

themoonlandingwasamyth   July 6th, 2009 - 2:48 pm

Apollo nut jobs believe, that Mythbuster’s pseudo science is a valid “debunk” of hoax facts.

But apparently they haven’t seen Jarrah White’s investigations. Mythbuster’s Apollo episode is debunked a long time ago.
http://www.youtube.com/user/WhiteJarrah

Even with 2009 technology, we cannot go to the Moon. Period. And even less on 1969.
The most important reason for this is the radiation.

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.