Texas Probation Officer Suspended for Nude Pictures of Herself on Porn Site

"First I heard of it was from you."

October 16, 2008 at 1:47 am - WOAI-TV
Dateline: Bexar County, TX
Gotta Luv Those Mexican Babes, Eh?   October 16th, 2008 - 2:34 am

Oh Yeah!

Jer   October 16th, 2008 - 3:33 am

She ain’t on one website, she’s on a few. I just watched a pretty long video of her in which pretty much everything was done/shown. I guess it just goes to show that if you want to use your body as a cash register you’re going to have to deal with it if you ever decide to reenter the world of respectability.

AnonymousMax   October 16th, 2008 - 7:06 am

uhhh,..stone,..sin,..first,..cast,…

or something like that?

demdicks   October 16th, 2008 - 7:32 am

AnonymousMax, you are one maxed out dumbs^&t!!

Does the old stone scripture apply to everything anyone’s ever done, on any level? you idiot?.

Yes, certain occupations should be completely and PERMANENTLY out of reach for ethical violations, in fact, if we truly held politicians’ feet to the fire for indescretions and not re-ele cting thus giving them a free pass to do more, we wouldn’t be in the morass our country is in. She does NOT have a “right” to make a living in this field, or many others, just go into porn full time. You and her must both be liberals to think it’s ok.

mike in fxbg   October 16th, 2008 - 7:43 am

Three questions: 1. Is she hot? 2. Which website(s)? 3. Why is the sherriff’s office surfing porn sites?

Get a grip! Oh, maybe you already are!   October 16th, 2008 - 7:50 am

demdicks,
What has her off hours activities got to do with her job as a probation officer? What sort of high ethics does it require to be a PO (aside from not breaking the law)? What she did was legal. They had no right to suspend her.

demdicks   October 16th, 2008 - 8:13 am

Hey Getagrip;
What has her off hours activities got to do with her job as a probation officer? What sort of high ethics does it require to be a PO (aside from not breaking the law)? What she did was legal. They had no right to suspend her.

IMHO, it has EVERYTHING to do with it, a probation officer has the power to REVOKE parole, therefore, FREEDOM for someone who may have done nothing more than say “Hey, I saw you on a porn website” or something even more harmless. Fact, a very HIGH percentage of these porn skanks are also into prostitution and drugs, this cannot be discounted, as well as the fact she may end up “owing” one of her bosses which could include taking a rival off the streets by revoking parole. I now see why someone like obummer could win an election, this country is full of idiots like you.

maverick   October 16th, 2008 - 8:32 am

Hey, I just see a girl trying to get a head.

liberals corrupt everything   October 16th, 2008 - 9:07 am

I’m surprised the teacher’s union didn’t “snatch” her up first.

Toad   October 16th, 2008 - 9:10 am

Damn…..EVERYTHINGS bid in Texas….

what was that web site again?

http://www.myspace.com/blaxeed

AnonymousMax   October 16th, 2008 - 9:18 am

Alright DumbDicks, lets throw down!

First of all you resorted to the patently obvious debating tactic of discrediting the messenger as opposed to the message.

Second, I am a Conservative(however moderate).

Third, DumbDicks, if you had paid attention to the video,(or is your attention span too short?) it was revealed that this happened BEFORE she became a parole officer, nothing actually illegal transpired, and she told those hiring her about her past transgressions.

Fourth, the actual quote with which I was trying to make light of, “He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her” is about hypocrisy.
In this day and age, we are so ensconced in hypocrisy it is sickening. Why decry any nudity on tv, yet worship heiress’s, and pop queens that can’t remember where they left their underwear, or what internet video they starred in this week. We elect Republican Senators who denounce gay marriage only to find out they either solicit sex from pages, or troll public restrooms for lewd encounters. We spend more on war and armaments than we do on education, yet claim that no child is left behind, and whenever we need a law passed, that we are “doing it for the children”. We spend more time with our televised family members than we do with our actual family members. God forbid we see Janet Jacksons nipple during the super bowl, (so outraged that cnn had to repeat showing it 10000 times) but its perfectly ok for television shows to have excessive amounts of shootings and violence.
(but yet somehow blame violent tragedies on the implausible belief that it was due to violent video games).

DumbDicks for once in your life try to not put things in terms of YOU, e.g. your (“IMHO”) opinion is anything but humble.
The point I was trying to make is that we are all Hypocrites. By your rabid replies, it is obvious that you are the king of hypocrites. Try showing a little compassion for once, instead of being enamored with everything that is about you and what you think.

Wanker Limbaugh   October 16th, 2008 - 9:20 am

Am I supposed to make some kind of conservative and constitutional argument on the 1st Amendment here and her rights to Bush Republican and capitalism’s most profitable venture (porn)?

crazy forrest   October 16th, 2008 - 10:34 am

What she did was perhaps immoral, but not unethical. If she did in fact disclose this to the hiring official, then *oops* their bad. They should have paid attention to it then.

It DOES compromise her position in fields of work such as high-school/grade-school teacher, and in this case perhaps puts her at risk if she is in charge of being PO for sex offenders.

DemDicks you kinda come off looking like a blowhard here.

Wanker Limbaugh   October 16th, 2008 - 10:36 am

After I watched the video my pants got wet.

claspur   October 16th, 2008 - 10:48 am

Sorry, Mr. Limbaugh I couldn’t make it to the John.

Now what was that web site again?   October 16th, 2008 - 12:32 pm

I am a Conservative, Evangelical Christian and I am deeply offended by this kind of activity.

Other   October 16th, 2008 - 2:43 pm

If anyone thinks your job is not affected by your actions outside the workplace, you are very naive, or you are self employed, or don’t have a worthwhile job.
Unless your state is a “right to work” state, whatever you do, whenever you do it, could affect your employment.
She works as a civil servant. If they have rules against it and she violated those rules then she deserves the punishment.

GoldenLotus   October 17th, 2008 - 6:21 pm

This is essentially a non story and NBC, as well as her employer, owe her a sincere apology.

What she did was legal (!!!) and is in no way an “ethics” violation.

Grow up people. This is why the rest of the world is still laughing at us, because of our ridiculously prudish Luddite ways.

Sgt. C. Foxtrot   October 18th, 2008 - 12:13 am

Damn. Makes me want to commit a few crimes. :D :D:D

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.