|
|||||||||||||||
![]() |
Tennis or Hockey? Brawl Erupts at US Open |
![]() |
|||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||
![]() |
|
![]() |
|||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
GOOD for that older gent. He should have ripped the asswipes balls off.
Google Maria Sharapova and "dead frog." Hilarious.
Hey, yo yo yo! I got the gang gestures down. I'm a tough guy. You old people show me respeck!
What was that girly-man thinking, he was at a TENNIS match. Worse yet–the tools at the end.
I am sure that if Obummer had a response it would be something like this…the kid acted stupidly! … oh wait, there are no blacks involved so Obummer wont have a comment…
Kudos to the gentleman for defending his wife. He put up with the rantings longer than most of us would. Certainly not all, but so many young people these days have such filthy mouths that it is shameful that they would kiss their wives and mothers with their filthy pie holes…..
I find it increasingly interesting that you all assume that the younger person started this. your siding with the old person on no factual grounds. in the video after the argument the "Kid" (for lack of a better term) sits down to have a drink and disengages from the altercation. the older gentleman then proceeds to assault the "Kid", In the course of the struggle the pair take a tumble, then the "kid" gets away an again DISENGAGES from the conflict only to be assaulted by the woman with which he was first arguing.
Arguing is not a crime, Those so called "Adults" committed assault.
They both likely said a bunch of crap they shouldn't have but it was the old guy who whet over and put his hands on someone first.
Pops needs to get a handle on himself.
Some Christian nation…the young man doesn't stop to think maybe he has had too much to drink or say and that the older man might be a veteran of war…some Christian nation!
It is kind of cool to see what happened. I was watching that match when they paused it.
You are an idiot! hahahahaha
Really cant stand all that new yorker hand gesture crap,I mean whats the point in it?The old mans fall is hilarious
Tennis. Nuff said.
Don't taze me bro!
Agreed. Well said.
you'll pay my SS until you're broke
LOLOLOL and the slogan this year for the Open is "It must be Love."
I blame the Democrats
THANK YOU rifleman!
I thought I'd warped to an alternate universe. That goes for the "so called officials" too. They immediately grabbed the kid like "oh of course it's got to be him who started this. No nice old couple would do that, right?"
OMG First the woman starts yellin at the guy and then when she walks off, the kid sits down, and WHAT???….grandpa decides to physically assault him, IN HIS SEAT. And after grandpa goes stadium divin….the WIFE comes back after the kid??? And folks here "SAW" the couple as the victims?.
They started it and both of them assaulted the kid. Just cause the brat had a mouth doesn't justify what they did. You don't get to HIT people cause you don't like what they say.
No winners here, but there's only two legal losers. Bonnie and klutz.
Oh the up side…it was no doubt the first exciting match there in decades, bwahahahaha.
Your right, we should base our opinions of the whole country on this vidoe.
BTW, your a jackass.
- The angry young dude thuggishly stands his ground against a woman and an old man who want to pass by – The punks taking the video didn’t get it either and it makes you wonder how they would feel if it were their parents being confronted by thoughtless thugs…
Hey this is f**kin New York Ya know? What the f**k is wrong wit you people? Do you need a f**kin baseball bat cracked over your f**kin head? Dis f**kin tennis s**t is f**kin boring ,ya know?
That punk sat down yes, but was still flapping his gums like a typical Liberal (not saying the punk was a Liberal, but it wouldn't surprise me) are prone to do. That 'kid' was probably saying some pretty vile things. Why would the woman keep barraging that younger guy if he wasn't so disrespectful and the older guy got so mad because of the things that punk was saying and to whom. Yes I tend to take the side of the older generation against the ignorant and disrespectful younger generation of today.
But you'll die a miserable and lonely person. If this was a muslim nation, that woman wouldn't be allowed to talk to the younger guy, you Liberal sexist pig.
Exactly, I'm sure that big mouth started it. The older generation tend to put more stock in respect more than this ignorant and trashy new generation nowadays.
And that's precisely the attitude that can cause you to have an accident that will turn your testicles into honeydew melons.
The facts we do have are as follows:
You have admitted your judgment is based on the ages (and gender apparently) of the people involved, and what you think may have happened — not based on what was actually committed. This is a LIBERAL thing to do, albeit they tend to do it based on race. Wise up.
How are you any better than President Obama judging the case of his friend before understanding all of the facts?
As was already said, "Arguing is not a crime." Striking someone, however, without good reason is. Until we know there was good reason, why should you babble about this guy being evil because he's young?
Wow, you all missed what really happened here. The woman is one of those foulmouthed types who will get in a guys face the way a guy would never dare to cuz he knows fists will fly if he does. I've seen so many women do this over the years. The young kid decides he doesn't have to take her crap, and yeah, he loses it. I don't know what was said, I'm sure it wasn't nice, but then the old guy starts realizing that his wife is being called lots of things she probably is, but has some sense of honor so he jumps in. For those of you siding with him, I ask you this? Have you ever had a mouthy woman get you into a fight? For those of you bashing NYC, the U.S. Open is there every year, and is typically a very civil event. But you know what, we don't take crap from people either, maybe 'y'all' could grow a set yourself some day. For me, until I know who said what, I'm going with the 'mouthy b***h scenario.
I actually was on the other side of this once with an elderly couple. I had coincidentally come out of my apt on Sunday morning to see a guy repeatedly ramming into my car, trying to fit into a spot he couldn't get in. I tried to get his attention but he ignored me, so I started screaming at at him at the top of my lungs. His wife jumps out, a nasty piece of work, screaming at me in Spanish, pretending they don't speak English. And then the husband starts screaming at me in English and she does gives up the ruse and goes into English (I speak Spanish, fyi). At this point, whatever deference I had shown the two of them seemed no longer appropriate. I got serious and told the old guy to get out of the car or I was going to drag him out of it. He gets out and the two of them get in my face. He was 5 inches taller – and they were both about 70 or so – but I think he finally saw the murderous glint in my eyes as I started to beg him to hit me, as I will never initiate physical force, but I usually finish it pretty well (crazy Irish DNA). He backs down. Incident over, but he was very close to hitting me. So, am I wrong because I was a younger, fit, guy who didn't let these old folks get away with being a-holes? I think not.
He disengaged from the fight still running his mouth. Yeah, I'm sure the older coulpe set out today to tag team some younger dude for sh1ts and giggles. I'm pretty sure that younger guy will live, the older man hardly touched him. The youger guy got back at the older guy by pushing the older man backwards and falling against the chairs which could have resulted in injuries greater than any the old guy could have inflicted on that punk. Yes arguing isn't a crime, but there are statutes that make profanity a misdemeanor in some states. So before you know what was said keep your babble to yourself.
"So before you know what was said keep your babble to yourself."
Hey, dufus!
Take your own advice.
Yeah your all so f-ing tough in new york,so scary,my moneys on the farmboy or ranch hand everytime.
Dufus? For a 'consevative' you are a hypocrit. I knew this thread would bring out all the second rate shade tree lawyers out of the woodwork. You started with the objective list of facts trying to impress everybody with your methodical breakdown of a video. Sometimes arguing is a crime, depending on whats said.
Yes but sometimes guys will say some evil and vile stuff to someone they know they can take in a fight knowing they will probably get away with it. Sometimes you don't have to touch somebody to bully them.
all i see is assault by the woman and the old guy …
"Dufus? For a 'consevative' [sic] you are a hypocrit [sic]."
First of all, I don't need to prove myself as a conservative; my arguments are sound and demonstrated you to be a complete idiot. Secondly, calling someone a dufus isn't against conservative values — something you should know. If it walks like a duck…. you know? Refusing to call it a duck is the politically correct (ie. liberal) thing to do.
Thirdly, you were the one raging about a young guy being wrong simply because he was, in fact, young. Age doesn't make right, and I didn't even need to post for your idiocy to shine through. Fourthly, you were the one telling me to shut up because you had no facts whatsoever on your side — so if this is going to degenerate into a challenge as to who is or isn't conservative, your credentials can be questioned just as easily.
Nevertheless, with that said, I don't care who or what you are. Your prejudice is unwelcome to me no matter what else you believe. Young or old, everyone should be treated based on what they actually do — not on how old they are. Only an idiot or someone evil would object to this notion.
"I knew this thread would bring out all the second rate shade tree lawyers out of the woodwork."
Such as yourself, no doubt, and your the-young-man-acted-stupidly belief rooted in nothing but unwarranted prejudice.
"You started with the objective list of facts trying to impress everybody with your methodical breakdown of a video."
Oh, it impressed you? That wasn't the intention.
I merely wanted to demonstrate how ridiculous your post was. Your conclusion was wrong, and your premise that a young guy is always in the wrong when pitted against an old guy is evil. After I analyzed everything reasonably, you could have admitted that I was right and that we'd all do best to sit back and let the facts come out. Instead, you responded with, blah-blah-blah-shut-up.
"Sometimes arguing is a crime, depending on whats said."
You're an excellent defender of the First Amendment. We don't even know what was said, and you want to attribute a crime to him for what he could have said because he was younger than his attacker.
Tennis or hockey? Surely you jest. In a hockey rink that little finger pointing twerp would've been tossed several rows much sooner, and the old guy wouldn't have had to do anything. Hockey fans respect their elders.
……"why should you babble about this guy being evil because he's young"
You started with the abusive rhetoric. I never said you were wrong in the legal sense, so scale back your indignance, you'll live longer. You can call me all sorts of derogatory insults regarding my intelligence all you want, small, insignifigant and miserable people tend to do that and I know you are bigger than that. You must have a lot of time on your hands to come on a message board and flex your intellectual muscle to 'idiots', how charitable of you. Everybody and I here are better for it.
I abhor the type of people who says all sorts of vile and hurtful things to provoke one to make physical contact so they can run to the nearest lawyer. I have had my run-ins with people like that. One do not have to be physical to be abusive. I apologize if you misunderstood me and maybe I should have prefaced my previous post with a little backgroud as to why I felt that way.
The enraged liberal couple attacked when he said he was a Palin supporter.
Grow up? If you mean that with all absence of malice, then have good day and God bless. If not, read on beacause I will reach adulthood long before you do in one sense or another.You have an extensive Christian blogsite and all of sudden you're an intellictual elite and have the moral moxie to insult people.Hypocrite (there i spelled it right this time,happy?). I assure you my existence is no less signifigant than yours. Hypocrite.
You are the reason the Christian faith have it's legions of detractors. Maybe the Agnostics are on to something (God forgive me).
You can't take your intelligence nor your smugness with you when our Savior comes to take us to our eternal home.
I had posted my admonition for you to grow up before I saw that you had edited yours with something resembling an apology. I deleted it for that very reason.
Seeing your response and your attack on my faith of all things, I think perhaps I was too generous when I decided to disengage from the discussion; after all, you really should grow up.
One thing you should take away from this conversation is that it's more of a shame to refuse to admit you were wrong than to try to fix it. If you're going to fight me now on religious grounds, it'll only be worse for you. If you're intent on continuing this conversation, I suggest doing so in private.
no- the punk liberal obama butt boy freaked when the Palin supporters told him to shut his foul and dirty pie hole
BTW-they should have picked up that little punk and thrown him over the edge long before the old guy had to stick up for his wife-what a bunch of psy wipes siting around him. Must have been liberals
That old guy wasn't going to allow that little punk to speak to a woman that way. Good for him. You don't scream at a woman like that. Especially not a family sporting event. What a loser.
Seriously astute analysis–for a cinder block.
1. I apologize that I expressed my opinion on this video, I guess the First Amendment applies to some people I guess. But I will not apologize for defending against an affront to my dignity, especially if it is on a public domain.
2. 'consevative' [sic] you are a hypocrit [sic]." Correcting my typos, really? It will be a full time job correcting everybodies typos on this site.
3. "fight me now on religious grounds". Religion isn't a battlefield. If one claims to know God more than another, then it assumes that God can be known completely, and thats erroneous.
4. I take extreme exception to anybody insulting my intelligence, even if that person feel they are intellictually superior. I hate smugness, thats why I don't frequent Newsvine anymore.
5. Yes, objectively my opinion will be wrong in the court of law, subjectively one's opinion is never wrong.
I've followed your posts (not exclusively, that would be weird) in previous threads and feel we are on the same 'team' against the secularization of this nation. You may be much more logical in your approach as opposed to my way of responding to these drivel spewing 'trolls' that frequently rear their ugly heads. If you find I am immature, I can't apologize for that, it is how I choose to view the world and serves me well.
You're right, the Regressivist push to Darwinize the American society through extreme secularization is definitely destabilizing what used to be a very civilized society. But isn't that what you anarchists think you want? 'Think" being the key word, there.
"…anarchists think…"
They think?
"For me, until I know who said what, I'm going with the 'mouthy b***h scenario."
Been there, done that…
No evidence, but most plausible…
To the extent that other nematodes do, I guess. Deeply saddening.
We're certainly tough on old men and women, heh heh… but like i said, being an a-hole knows no age discrimination.
The "kid" looks like l a lot of the youngsters I see every weekend here in NYC. Loud, obnoxious, and after a few beers think they own the place. Their typical defense is since they're paying for something (like tickets to a sporting event or drinks at a bar) that gives them the right to act however they please with no regard for the people around them.
New York Baby.
That Old Guy lost his friging mind what did he think he was going to do.
I hope the young guy did not get kicked out he was the one who got attacked.
thats pretty much exactly one of the things you can hear the kid say in the other video posted above.
He's a sweetheart isn't he?
The young punk stopped puffing out his chest once the security came into place. What a Jersey Shore head case.
This does not look good for tennis- it may create a buzz, but I am sure those who adore the gentleman side of the game- this aint too good
Office 2010
Microsoft Office 2010
Microsoft word
Office 2007
Microsoft Office
Microsoft Office 2007
Office 2007 key
Office 2007 download
Office 2007 Professional
Outlook 2010
Microsoft outlook
Microsoft outlook 2010
Windows 7
bytj4B dibdiryohngc, [url=http://mozqqnqxhdre.com/]mozqqnqxhdre[/url], [link=http://ctkveuyrezbc.com/]ctkveuyrezbc[/link], http://klbefhgjtarm.com/
doxycycline nih valium =O prednisone buy 887
Best regards for you all,
Looking forward to your visiting.
http://www.buyshopping.us/
Post a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
No tennis for you!