Breitbart.tv

Bush family is insider elite status quo. Card carrying Skull n Bones memeber. What if Paul is correct?

Conservatives don't call Israel an apartheid nation – only liberals do. Hello.

The implosion continues.

What if he's wrong – which looks like the odds on favorite.

Show the whole speech you commie breitbart editor

TThanks to the BUSH'S WE NOW LIVE UNDER THE CONTROL OF THE TSA's MILITARY POLICE FORCE.
OBAMA'S NAZI ARMY ,Coming to your home town Soon !

What a vile and loathesome little person!

Ron Paul is an idiot.

Sad…At one time I put some stock in what Ron Paul had to say, particularly in economic issues. This type of rhetoric shows a side of Ron Paul that is quite disturbing. Any President faced with the prospect of commiting US soldiers to combat would not do so with "glee".

So you're justifying conspiracy fantasies? Grow up.

One of the most despicable comments I've ever heard from a politician.

Paul should withdraw from the race.

Or he could blame the Lizard People.

No, wrong. Thanks to 19 hijackers we live under the TSA. Stop blaming Bush.

I love the Breitbart editors. They are the best!

If they don't gag him, the guys with the butterfly nets will have him in custody before his next meds are due

I suspect he'll go for the Lizard People.

…yeah?….so….what's the problem with what he said? How many times will it take for some people to understand that Iraq had nothing to do with 911? Iraq had nothing to do with 911. Iraq had nothing to do with 911. Iraq had nothing to do with 911.
The plan was in place to over-throw Saddam starting in the late '90's. Get over it, Breitbart.

"Iraq had nothing to do with 911"

And?

you may be willing to surrender america and appease the small hand full of 'islamic extremists' fortunately the rest of us aren't going to surrender.

RON PAUL 2012 For LIBERTY

If you don't see the problem here, there's no point talking to you.

"The plan was in place to over-throw Saddam starting in the late '90's"

Ooooo, a NEW conspiracy theory.

Tell us more.

And mind the chemtrails.

Oh, he's not stupid. Just horribly wrong, and captivated by a radical ideology.

Weak weak weak people on here have reported me so that my comments have to be approved by the administrator.

My point has been made. They are against freedom of speech…. so they are communists.

Anyone get the position of Ron Paul haters yet? They are anti-freedom and anti-free speech. They hate the message of freedom and they are the internal enemy spoken of.

Conspiracy fantasies like "Obama is a secret Muslim" and "Obama wasn't born in the US". They work both ways. For what it's worth I don't believe the Bush OR the Obama conspiracy crap

Maybe he's right. Billy Bush is able to get all of those celebrity interviews on access hollywood. Now that's an insider!

Remember all of those Iraqis responsible for 9/11? …. neither do I.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cpP7b2lUxVE

In all honesty, and I have experienced it and other have said the same to me and that is the Main thing they don't like about Ron Paul is his rabid and zealot supports who shout people down who ask serious questions about his positions

Ron Paul needs to be discredited and mocked. He is a moron.

Like it or not, Bush did give us homeland security also. Furthermore, although I don't feel it was a conspiracy within the gov't, I don't believe much the Gov't tells us, and we deserve to know. Witness also the OK city bombing and the subsequent FBI cover-up.

project for a new american century– (cheney rumsfeld)
Post-9/11 call for regime change in Iraq http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_...
On September 20, 2001 (nine days after the September 11, 2001 attacks), the PNAC sent a letter to President George W. Bush, advocating "a determined effort to remove Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq," or regime change:

…even if evidence does not link Iraq directly to the attack, any strategy aiming at the eradication of terrorism and its sponsors must include a determined effort to remove Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq. Failure to undertake such an effort will constitute an early and perhaps decisive surrender in the war on international terrorism.[4][19]

From 2001 through 2002, the co-founders and other members of the PNAC published articles supporting the United States' invasion of Iraq.[20] On its website, the PNAC promoted its point of view that leaving Saddam Hussein in power would be "surrender to terrorism."[21][22][23][24]

In 2003, during the period leading up to the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the PNAC had seven full-time staff members in addition to its board of directors.[1]

New Pearl Harbor"

Section V of Rebuilding America's Defenses, entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force", includes the sentence: "Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event––like a new Pearl Harbor" (51).[14]

Though not arguing that Bush administration PNAC members were complicit in those attacks, other social critics such as commentator Manuel Valenzuela and journalist Mark Danner,[41][42][43] investigative journalist John Pilger, in New Statesman,[44] and former editor of The San Francisco Chronicle Bernard Weiner, in CounterPunch,[45] all argue that PNAC members used the events of 9/11 as the "Pearl Harbor" that they needed––that is, as an "opportunity" to "capitalize on" (in Pilger's words), in order to enact long-desired plans.
[edit] Inexperienced in realities of war

Either his so-called brain isn't connected to his mouth, which leads a deranged life of its own…or even scarier, he's saying exactly what he thinks. Either way, no sane* person could possibly vote to allow him near the nuclear trigger.

* "Sane" obviously excludes any Paulistinians.

Neither do I. Your point?

Anti Semitic kook.

Simply psychopathic. There is no American that experienced 9/11 that had a hint of glee, Mr. Paul, you conspiracy theory goof. It seems you experience glee deriding good people and constructing delusions for your cult. Take your anti-Semitc, racist, hateful, neo-Confederate self to a quiet retirement and quit forking up America.

yup there is a new documentary 'a noble lie' has all the witnesses on tape looks good.

We know — Bush conspired with the Jews to blow up the WTC, crash a plane in a Pennsylvania field, and ram a plane into the Pentagon so Bush could go into Iraq. Disgusting, on the order of Reverend Wright.

Ya he was so happy he made sure they never attacked us again …10 years later and no attacks on our soil. Some day history will give Bush credit for kicking the Sh!t out of people who attack/want to attack us. Thank GOD Obama or Kerry werent president whent that happened.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C7SwOT29gbc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5akpnIFK-RM

this is what woke me up.

This is not Ron Paul speaking on this video. It is the fake that wrote those Ron Paul newsletters that Ron Paul didn't write.

So you agree Iraq had nothing to do with it? Good… baby steps, Flush, baby steps. We'll work on your weirdo conspiracy stuff later.

Straw man.

Well my point was proven by the comments from the Paul haters. I labeled them all communist in my comments under Prez2012.

Weak, weak weak minds have reported me to the administrators for using my Freedom of Speech.

My POINT HAS BEEN MADE. The Paul Haters are in fact COMMUNISTS! Only communists hate freedom and freedom of speech because it ruins their self-perceived status in society. The first thing a communist does is shut down freedom of speech and they are running rampant on this site.

Start with the anonymous Breitbart editors. We listed for over a year how Andrew was against the MSM and their tactics and we all applauded and supported him. NOW his own site is doing exactly what the MSM does and the communists come out of the closet and cheer him.

Weak people who can't see the message. They think life is about being curled up in the corner scared of the boogeyman. All that I labeled as communists…you are weak!!!!!

LOL!

Actually, he probably didn't write the newsletters. They were probably written by Murray Rothbard and Lew Rockwell. But he still likes Rothbard and Rockwell, so he's protecting them. Which, of course, shows terrible judgment. And of course he allowed all that racist drivel to go out under his name, and pretends he knew nothing about it, which is a blatant and obvious lie.

How so?

Hey let us remember that Prescott Bush and others approached General Smedley Butler USMC about taking over the US and creating a Fascist nation… I put nothing past them.

just shut up and get out as you are annoying and being used by the democrap infiltrators.

Nobody in the Bush Administration claimed Iraq caused 9/11.

And this thread is not about who caused 9/11. It is about Paul claiming that the Bush Admin was "gleeful" about 9/11 because it would give them an excuse for war with Iraq.

So a straw man AND an attempt at deflection.

Fail.

firing off your infamous iq which you tout as much higher than everyone else….

kneel before goo…..

If you'd have paid attention, the building was burning at the base, the left hand roof collapsed (in the view on the second video, but you'll have to look at an unedited version as this one cut the important observations) first with an air conditioner unit falling in on the side away from the camera, and then the building collapsed in the middle.__Like the WTC, the fire heat softened the structural steel and the building collapsed. No need to invoke explosives and conspiracies except in those with compulsive conspiracy disorder, like found in the Ron Paul cult and Charlie Sheen.

I understand. Ron Paul bragged they were his work at some point in the past, before the racism was publicized.

We're sinking in debt and people are worried about this triviality? It is going to take drastic measures like what Ron Paul is pushing (totally shut down whole departments), not tweaks like Romney thinks will work.

when you start editorializing, you're no longer reporting facts but opinions. that's great then that Breitbart is no longer considering himself a reporter but now closer to his roots of working with the Huffington Post as a liberal emotionalist.

"Sounding more like Michael Moore or Barack Obama…" that 's an opinion of Ron Paul, not a fact.

it is remarkable how people distrust their government but when it comes to this issue they have blind trust.

Baby Obama was flown to Hawaii in an SR-71 by the Kennedy family as the heir to Camelot. The story is slated for release late October 2012.

No sane people ever claimed Iraq was resposible for 9/11.

Nice straw man, though.

was Paul taken out of context?

Next up, PROOF THE BOOOOOOSSSSHHHH IS BEHIND THE CHEMTRAILS CONSPIRACY!!!!!!!!

Oh indeed. His name was the selling point, after all. He only "disavowed" the contents once they became a liability.

He's a little out there sometimes but neither the Clinton or Bush administrations acted on known intelligence to prevent the attacks, and look what we have now. Even to the casual observer it smacks of dereliction and malfeasance.

16 seconds is not gonna decide my vote

The relentless attacks against Paul continues here on Breitbart, who's on the fence with many of his commentors about pulling the lever either for NWO RINO Romney or NWO Phony Gingrich…

Absolutely no assessment…Paul's correct. Did Iraq attack us on 9-11? Did we declare war on Iraq as a nation as a result? Most of the 9-11 hijackers happened to be Saudi nationals, with a Pakistani thrown in for variety.

So, the pretext for the war was WMD..and the media laughed at Bush when none were found but those in favor of the invasion kept citing the "Intl community" that agreed Saddam was cooking up nukes in his backyard….all a lie.

Those seeking to maintain the George Herbert Walker Bush warmonger status quo want to maintain it at all costs.

LOOK!!!! OVER THERE!!!!!! YOUTUBE VIDEOS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

No, I don't.

And watch out for the chemtrails.

I assume then that you believe that the Bush administration WAS gleeful that we were attacked on 9/11.

It isn't a triviality. It exposes a demented, conspiratorial mindset. Such a man cannot be trusted to lead the country.

And the policies he is proposing to deal with spending would never make it past Congress. For that matter they won't fly in the general election, no matter how much we might wish otherwise. Politics is the art of the possible, and there's not a consensus for drastic scale-backs in the size of government.

A skillful politician could forge such a consensus. Paul is not that man.

It's not trivial, it's Rpn Paul displaying his essential unseriousness.

Paul's correct that the Bush Admin was "gleeful" about 9/11 because it would give them an excuse to attack Iraq?

You're insane.

I'd ask all those Kurds who were gassed about Saddam's WMD program.

Oh.

Wait, you can't.

They're all dead from poison gas attacks.

I'm willing to surrender you, and that's a start.

This may be the last Iowa caucus if they elecct moonbat!

There is a fundamental difference between "not trusting" the government in the conservative sense (e.g. recognizing that government is congenitally prone to corruption and incompetence) and "not trusting" in the Ron Paul/paleoconservative/nutcase sense (e.g. imagining conspiracy fantasies).

One behavior is common sense, informed by history. The other is insanity.

…wait… what… the AC unit caused building 7 to collapse ?… the base would be the bottom…were you watching another video ?

And fire can't melt steel! Just ask Rosie O'Donnel!

I guess Breitbart is one of the many RINO/neocon/liberal sites that tow the line for the Socialist Democrats .

Newsflash – Ron Paul, running for PRESIDENT! Not dog catcher. He's a nut.

I guess you're an idiot who lives in a self-referential reality bubble.

"Your session has expired. Your session has expired. Your session has expired. Your session has expired….."Your session has expired. Your session has expired. Your session has expired. Your session has expired….."Your session has expired. Your session has expired. Your session has expired. Your session has expired…..

A convenient, fascistic way to prevent me and others from commenting on what others post here..

Trying to prove something by pulling 16 seconds out of a full speech? Wow. This pathetic Neocon smear campaign is really in full swing.

But do yourselves a favor by checking out what Rumsfeld and Cheney were saying in cabinet meetings – invading Iraq was one of the first things discussed immediately following 9/11; Colin Powell and even Bush were taken aback by it!

Then there is the fact that whole new departments of full-reaching, Constitution-breaching tenticles of the Federal Government were created in the form of the Department of Homeland Security…. We're all conservatives here, aren't we? Would we not all agree that Big Government loves power and reacts with glee upon new opportunities to grow its power?

Oh please.

You really are a conspiracy-obsessed crackpot, aren't you?

I get the "session has expired" message all the time. Like half a dozen on this thread alone. So is Breitbart also conspiring against anti-Paul posters?

Or are you just a lunatic?

Hold on there, Bucky. Ron Paul's whole theory revolves around Iraq being behind 9/11. He is the one pushing that angle and nobody else. That is the whole "we were bommmmbing them and they got maddd" line that Paul uses all the time. We were enforcing a no-fly zone and having planes fired on for ten years and sometimes would fire back. We were bommmmbing them, don't you know and they got madddd.
I don't know why everybody felt required to cushion criticism of Paul with the "he is good on the economy" disclaimer. Once I heard him fuzzying up the 9/11 facts I wouldn't give him credit for knowing his name. He is a menace as are a fair percentage of his followers.

The administration went to great lengths to make a connection between Iraq and Al Qaeda based on some phone calls etc. (though not an 'operational connection'), the implication being that Iraq was secretly aiding the group. That's history, my friend.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IJiNtpIpD6k&fe...

And, this thread is about Ron Paul's statement about 9/11, Iraq, and the Bush administration is it not? So, it's not "deflection" either. In fact, it is on topic. It's common knowledge that neocons get excited about wars and nation building. Do you not? Admit it, you can't wait for another war… only, I don't know who on earth is going to pay for it.

What a vile thing to say. Now I know why he is all for drug legalization. He's on them.

And the walls are starting to get closer and closer to Paul and his insanity. I am with Paul and his domestic Constitutional principles but his foreign policy, specifically with Iran, is absolutely insane naivete isolationist bull crap. I would like to bring our boys home from many areas where I don't think we should be but his Iran policy is past the border of incompetent to buying up real estate.

Straw man again.

Nobody denies that Iraq became a major discussion topic right after 9/11. The issue is Paul claiming the Bush Admin was "gleeful" — claiming that they welcomed the mass-murder of American citizens because it supplied an excuse for war.

BTW its only one step from that to being a Troofer and Paul has made numerous statements showing sympathy for the Troofers.

Also, your reference to Homeland Security is a weak distraction/deflection attempt.

Bush was trying to fight the war without naming the enemy and that is why, as of now, we are, each and everyone of us, in danger of being labeled :enemy combatant" in our own "homeland". It isn't because Bush is the enemy. It is because pissant political correctness is one weapon the real enemy wields with a skill we haven't learned to combat.

Your stupid

It's mesmerizing, really.

Like watching someone fall off a cliff. You know what's coming but you just can't take your eyes off them.

No, it is not about all those other things. It is about Paul's statement.

Pointing out connections between Iraq and Al Qaeda (which were real) is in no way the same thing as blaming Iraq for 9/11.

And your cheap smears against "neocons" are childish and laughably false.

Why pretend we finished the Gulf War because Iraq perpetrated 9/11? There was a long history of Iraq violating the cessation of hostilites agreement from Gulf War I leading to Gulf War II, any one of which could justify resumption of hostilities. Remember the shots at our planes in the no fly zones, the interference with nuclear and other inspections? As to Iraq having any links to 9/11 — I don't know. Saddam sure passed money around and he had training camps for terrorists and he sure didn't like the US. But that is irrelevant to the war with Iraq, other than it maybe lowered the threshold for saying enough is enough for tolerating law-breaking, terrorism funding and training militant dictators violating the law after invading allies, killing US troops, and threatening more of the same.

Ron Paul makes me sick. He's as wacky as they come. He's making Libertarian's look like Liberals.

Prescott Bush is dead…You don't have to worry about him anymore…

Hey all you Paulbots, if you can't take the heat, get out of the kitchen.

"My point has been made. They are against freedom of speech…. so they are communists."

"Freedom of speech" is the freedom to speak freely without government censorship. You are on an internet forum.. and your speech can be censored! You really are an idiot!

You are "free" to post your thoughts on this forum and the mods are "free" to remove them. Welcome to America!

If you cant accept this, you are the one who is anti-freedom!

Hey, Bush didn't have a vendetta against Saddam now, did he? Historical revisionism hard at work here I see…

17 states have Open or Semi-Open primaries: AL, AZ, AR, AK, GA, HI, ID, IN, MA, MI, MS, MO, SC, TX, VT, VA, and WI. Independents, fed-up democrats, unaffiliated, and genuinely conservative Republicans, make sure you vote Ron Paul in these primaries and we'll hand the status-quo, war-loving Establishment the largest pink slip it ever saw in 2012.

Ron Paul 2012.

Distraction? This topic revolves around The Department of Homeland Security! The reason governments "never let a crisis go to waste" is because they can use crisises to grow their power, riding the back of fear to take away the liberties of the citizenry and stretch their influence.

No, that's not what I said. The long side of the building away from the camera had an air conditioning unit that is seen as the first item to settle simply because the camera doesn't show the roof well, meaning the front left collapsed first, mostly out of view of the camera, and then the rest collapsed. It's not important. Nothiing can break the psychoses of conspiratists.

Obviously Israel can't defend herself with 300 nuclear weapons and submarines able to deliver them to the doorstep….That's what the neocons want you to believe.

It's all about generational bankruptcy and rendering America insolvent.

In his own way, Ron Paul is waving his hands screaming 'don't vote for me, I don't want it!'.

I take the equal justice stance for ALL the Muslims countries…….just turn them all into a sheet of glass and keep the freakin' oil!

Ron Paul is a racist bastard who makes money off his sheeple every four years because he keeps all of his campaign donations.

GOD BLESS ISRAEL.

As a "Dr.", he writes all of his own prescriptions.

BTW, why kind of self respecting man becomes a V-jay-jay doctor?

He really doesn't, does he? He just keeps all of the $$ from his moneybombs. What a bunch of dumbasses!

Imagine AlGoracle and dangerous,lefty bolsheviks with him,on 9/11.*SHUDDER*

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.