Breitbart.tv

3 words…fake, fake and fake
Those guy were not US military. Wrong boots, wrong uniform, and the last I saw
US army does not drive Mercedes Benz
FAKE FAKE FAKE

They should of tried to stop him if they didn’t think it was right. What great friends. Well, then again, what do you expect from anarchists?

Big time wrong uniforms. Trousers weren’t bloused. Also, only the Marine Corps rolls the sleeves to show inside lining. I am agreeing with rhall. If this was real, then the anti-military MSM would be all on this. They know it is fake also and they don’t want to go down that fake National Gaurd letter road again.

…overdue library book at Carnegie Mellon?

This is probably more a specialized police unit; not the military. All of the services, Army, Air force, Marines, and Navy have shifted away from the BDU uniform to digitial cammouflage several years ago. Also, the vehicle pictured is an umarked Crown Victoria; mostly used in police work and not in the military (they seem to prefer Impala foir their military police units and garrisons).

ah the pro regressive bowel movement

rhall if you think that is a Mercedes, have I got a car for you. I do believe it is staged, notice you can’t see the tag of the Ford.

it’s not a benz, it’s a crown vic.

and if the military really was going to take part in rounding up these doucheba-er protesters, i’m pretty sure they would not have done it in uniform.

That didn’t look like a Mercedes to me, but I could be wrong.
This could be any number of U.S. paramilitary/mercenary groups.
As for it being fake, anything is possible, but this doesn’t look good.
It looks like what the U.S. government helped Pinochet do in Chile
when thousands of young people were ‘disappeared.’

I’m glad to know there is a plan for teabaggers in case they go too far.

I might be wrong, but wouldn’t we know if the President ordered the military to manhandle citizens?

They could be (private) military contractors.

A friend was talking to me last night that there was a group of trained military trainers that were sent to the G20 meeting. There job is to train and support the local forces in the effort to secure any threats of terrorism against the world leaders and destruction of area around the meeting. They are there to train not to enforce but they are allowed to support the local law enforcement in these two cases, destruction or threat of harm to leaders.

Note, I am not for this meeting but I don’t support this incivility by anti-war, anti-government groups. I support protests like the 9/12 March on DC that was one of the most peaceful DC has seen in a while. Funny that the media is telling us the opposite. Though it doesn’t take someone with a brain to know their bias.

Note, there is an interesting NY Times article on http://www.americanparchment.com that talks about ‘One World Order.’ Check it out.

rhall: you might want to view the video again… Do you know the difference between a Mercedes and a Grand Marquis??? You might want to take off the rose colored glasses pal.

As has been stated, wrong uniforms and the fact they had no equipment. As a former infantryman I should also point out those clowns were miserably out of shape to qualify as ‘military’ security. Probably a bunch of tree hugging, birkenstock wearing, tofu eating ACORN employees staged this.

This is funny! The protester doesn’t even put up a fight. ROFLMAO! I guess the SEIU and ACORN are now into theater?

Violation of the Constitution. I don’t care if Congress slipped in a Possie C in one of there trojan bills. It’s still against the spirt of the law. The old BDU’s are still worn by some reserve and guard units not all have the new digital camo. Also the black boots are ok for dark BDU’s. The car is a Ford Crown Vic.

Still think this is fake?!

It looks like the guys in camouflage are mercenaries,
if in fact they aren’t currently serving as members of the military!

Maybe they are getting in a little practice and exercise
before heading over to Afghanistan as private contractors.

http://www.infowars.com/military-police-kidnap-g20-protester-shove-him-into-unmarked-car/

paul September 25th, 2009 – 10:20 am

“…If this was real, then the anti-military MSM would be all on this…..”

GE, a major part of the Military Industrial Complex, owns NBC, right? Same with the other MSM outlets. They are all owned by the military, essentially, and operated by the CIA. Look up “Operation Mockingbird.” They do it covertly in most cases or openly like this.

http://www.commondreams.org/views01/0904-08.htm

Does anyone (seriously) know if this is a true video or fake. I’ve been to Snopes.com and it doesn’t have anything on the video. I am an active blogger / state activist and am trying to credential this video before commenting and sending to my list.

I agree, its fake. Not only is it unsafe for them to do that in the middle of a crowd, but the green camouflage is not used by very many branches anymore and there was not any unit insignia or American flags on any of the uniforms. Also, the one guy didn’t have his uniform pants bloused, something that he would get yelled at for if he walked two feet. It’s convenient that the license plate was not shown as well.

Jason Bermas reported from the scene of the sonic weapon. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yMte-iY7d48

Yep, wrong boots. They don’t even match

Someone somewhere is wanting someone else to fire the first shot. Be patient. Be cautious of what the libs might do to stir the pot!

Yep looked fake to me.

No, they’re not military nor paramilitary. If they were military, they’d be in full MARPAT uniforms with helmets, M.O.L.L.E. vests, and M-4 rifles. They would also have insignia as well as an MP (Military Police) patch on their arms. The only place military personnel are authorized to arrest citizens is on a U.S. military base.

If they were a covert military group or a paramilitary mercenary group, they’d be dressed as civilians.

Also, only the police still use Crown Vics… and even those are being replaced by Dodge Chargers. On the base I worked, the MPs drove Dodge Durangos.

Yep, Martial Law has hit America… Maybe national guard and MP’s and special forces. I am not worried about boots, I am worried about people disappearing from our nation to never be seen again. next we will have civil war right here in the good old USA. Stock up folks it’s coming.

Run it frame by frame.

A few things to note.
How many offical cars have rain deflectors on the back windows
All 4 guys have different uniforms from different eras.
Some are wearing Bling, Note the large gold watch on right arm.

This is the kicker.

About 25 seconds into the video, you see the car pull away. There are two guys standig in the street in black swat type uniforms. One has a helmet, the other a gas mask and no helmet. Notice the rifle, it has the red tip, like it is a to gun or is a training rifle.

Why does the videographer pan right at the beginning, when the action is on the left of the screen. There would be a lot of comotion with 4 armed paramilitary types grabbing a guy in the middle of the street. Why not video that?

It could be something else, but is in now our military.

Meant to say:
It could be something else, but is NOT our military.

I am a former Marine and can tell you a few things about this video: The first thing you should know is that the Army Special Forces and Military Police Units get training in snatching riot leaders from crowds and also in envoy protection, which interestingly enough is similar in execution.

First we have to address the uniforms: The two white “soldiers” in this film are wearing Army Multicam ACUs, its the uniform of the Army Special Forces, while the black “soldier” is wearing an old style BDU uniform. The old pattern BDU uniform is only used by the Department of the Army (DOA) gaurds and Navy personnel. DOA guards would only be used for protecting sensitive sites, not crowd control, and there are no Navy bases in Pittsburgh. There is an MP armband on the black “soldier”.

Next, the method of removal from the scene. Normally, riot police units will move on foot to apprehend instigators, here they use a car. This is a trained practice.. but if the situation permits, the suspect will ALWAYS be flexi-cuffed (handcuffed) before moving to another location, here hes simply forced into the vehicle, and I assume he wasn’t searched, very risky for the Military Personnel involved. This type of manuever would only be used if absolutely necessary, as the camera pans out, there appears to be almost nothing going on in the shot.

The car also comes from the opposite direction of the “safe area” (where police cruisers and vans have established the cordon, which you can see when the camera pans out and to the left), this would be extremely dangerous if the crowd was really “hostile”, especially since the uniformed “soldiers” have no weapons or form of protection, if they were caught behind the crowd, there would be no way for their friendly unit to come and help them.

Finally, the stature and build of all “soldiers” involved certainly seems accurate, but there is some inconsistency in their appearance. While they all have regulation haircuts, their uniforms dont match. It is irregular for Army Special Forces to be neat and trim unless they are doing some type of high profile work (like shown here). If they were told to get such high regulation haircuts by their superiors, common sense indicates they would also have to comply with a stricter uniform regulation. These guys dont have one. One of the white subjects has suede desert boots and the other has black boots, both of them have their boots unbloused (Highly irregular especially when around civilians, until recently it was a requirement have your boots bloused even in Iraq), and one has his sleeves rolled up while the other has his sleeves rolled down. If these were military men, they would have to follow certain regulations about their appearence in uniform, these guys follow none, except clean shaves and haircuts, its very inconsistent.

There is a fourth “soldier” in this shot that you almost completely miss if you dont look closely. His uniform appears to be of some sort of blue-violet design, he appears halfway through the sequence wearing a baseball cap. Military personnel do not wear purple uniforms, you can only find them in Army surplus stores. As these guys drive off in a car, which is a terrible snatch vehicle for obvious reasons they drive past two “policemen”. One cop is in a gasmask, the other is wearing a helmet. One has a shotgun with an orange tip on it, the other is unarmed. Professionals do not use orange tips on their weapons because we do not want anyone to mistake them for toys. That being said, the body armor they are using appears to be oversized and hollywoodish, though it would still be very expensive to acquire this stuff. By full count, that makes 6 police/soldiers, five of them unarmed, one armed with a toy-looking shotgun. All of their appearances look un-uniform and unprofessional, much less intimidating, which is not something you want in riot situations.

These were not contractors operating under the orders of the CIA, if you think that the CIA controls anything that happens within the united states you are a conspiracy theorist. The government is rarely organized and even more poorly managed, thats how 9/11 happened. To those who think these are contractors… that would be extremely illegal, and it defies logic. If you had the resources and intention of using private military contractors to squelch public outcry you wouldn’t dress them in Military Clothes, especially bad military clothes and send them out in broad daylight to apprehend a protester who probably has an over-inflated opinion of himself and his ability to change anything. Conspiracy theorists need to get a life. There is corruption and misuse of power,but its not this overt.
It cannot be definitively said that this was a complete sham, if it was for real its was extremely amatuer and overkill, and very unlike any Special Forces manuever that I have ever witnessed. In the end you have to go with your gut, my gut says this was make-believe.

I didn’t know Hush Puppies were government issue.

I don’t know anything about uniforms or boots, but when was the last time you saw a soldier do anything without his rifle? That just didn’t look right.

Pardon my ignorance, but why are progressives protesting the G20? Wouldn’t they be all for that? And with Obama being the commander in chief these days, wouldn’t they be making him look bad with the military being used in such a way?

I don’t know, just wondering.

You can buy these uniforms and boots at:

http://www.usmilitarysurplus.com/

A few more clarifications after reading other posts:

The Pennsylvania National Gaurd does wear the new Digital ACU pattern uniform, the black guy in the shot could not have been a uniformed MP in the Pennsylvania National Gaurd.

“Special Forces Soldier #1″ appears to be carrying a concealed handgun on his back right side.

SF guys love good watches, “Bling” isnt an indicator that their not SF.

None of these guys are wearing softcovers or berets outdoors. Another uniform no no.

I dont see any of the soldiers as out of shape, also as an infantryman, the ACU uniforms are very baggy and loose and might make people look out of shape.

My earlier statement about the MP band appears to be wrong, it looks like they were wearing ID armbands.

In another picture, that I’ve linked to below, the guys in camouflage have detained a guy on the ground and are clearly working with or coordinated with the local combat police.

http://www.infowars.com/military-police-kidnap-g20-protester-shove-him-into-unmarked-car/

The guys in camouflage could easily be mercenaries from eastern Europe.

Hope & Change.

Whether the detainment was legal or staged is difficult to determine by the mere 34 seconds of filming we’re given to work with. What we can do with this limited amount of film is break down everything within in it as to help debunk some of the concerns with the scene.

Are the men in question representative of US active military units?

No. Just by casual glance of the video you can see that none of the four guys are wearing the MARPAT/ACU style fatigues current issue to our armed forces. Second, the black man in the woodland camo is not wearing regulation footwear for any military branch. Starting at the 14 second mark and finishing at the 16 second mark you can clearly tell that these are not military issue for none of the boots have padding at the top akin to those found in typical work boots such as Timberlands. Furthermore, at the 12 second mark you can see that his laces are either untied or not properly secured by being wrapped around the top of the boot and clear that they aren’t at the 16 second mark. More likely these are tactical style boots found in any site or store who sells police/security gear. (http://www.milleruniformsusa.com/commerce/images/12001_019_lg.jpg for an example)

The second indication comes from the 14 second mark where the driver of the car steps out. His pants are unbloused (not tucked into the boot) as is the white man who is assisting the black man with the “detainee”. Also, the driver of the car is wearing a rather reflective watch (metal plated) not typical of what would be worn. Additionally, the two who have restrained the detainee nor the driver are wearing any identification badges or insignias that match with any active military identifiers.

Are the men in question law enforcement officers?

More than likely and if not security contractors based upon the following observations. First, the vehicle of choice of many police departments across the nation is the Ford Crown Victoria. Easily mistaken with the Mercury sister car his one is strictly a Ford going by the left rear wheel rim logo at the 20 second mark followed by the doors, rear end and taillights shown through the video. Additionally, at the 22 second mark you can see the LCD display from a laptop located inside the car as well as a single antenna mount on the top rear of the trunk (20 second mark).

In addition to the car the two people who are bringing the protestor to the car are wearing mace cans on their right hips. The first visible notice of the mace can is found at the 10 second mark on the white male as he’s lifting up on the detainee and at the 11 second mark when he’s turning to open the door of the car. The black male who’s restraining the detainee has a can of mace as well on his right and it’s visible starting in the 12 second all the way to the 17 where you can clearly see that the object on his hip is cylindrical.

Further, the two detaining males as well as the driver of the car are wearing identification badges on their left shoulder much like those seen on other law enforcement personnel in other videos and pictures. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=113179945&ft=1&f=1001 for an example. Also at 13 second mark the mic from the black male’s radio falls off his jacket and misses hitting the detainee in the head.

Marine7 I stand corrected about the nonuse of ACUs I couldn’t completely identify the type of fatigues the two visible white males were wearing; however, I agree with your and others assessment that there’s a very good chance this was completely staged if it can’t be verified these were LEOs. As you point out the person detained wasn’t flex-cuffed to which almost all photos covering the events in Philadelphia show all riot police, state and others with flex-cuffs on their person and their handling of the suspect is very unprofessional at best.

Well looks official, I guess the conspiracy cooks weren’t so cooky this time huh?
Doesn’t say which “joint taskforce” but we know that that is use when they are trying to cover up military involvement. Might just be LEO’s however, the military has been ramping up for ‘crowd control’ and civil unrest. If it IS military we should ALL be concerned. Maybe it happened prior, but whoever it was surely didn’t identify themselves OR have identifying emblems. I certainly would have wanted to defend myself against thugs I have no knowledge of.

As a former soldier, let me ask one question, the military voted over 80% for McCain (as they had for Bush and Dole and the other Bush before), with that many conservatives serving in the military (especially once you start getting into the special forces) don’t you think one of them would have said something by now if they had been ordered to unconstitutionally detain American citizens at the behest of President Obama? I swore an oath to the constitution as did every soldier I served with, and we took it to heart.

I agree, this isn’t military, uniforms are all wrong. But rhall, that’s a Crown Vic not a Mercedes.

G20 cops dressed in camo ’snatch’ protester

http://rawstory.com/2009/09/video-appears-to-show-us-troops-kidnapping-protester/

“Military members supporting the G20 Summit work with local law enforcement authorities but do not have the authority to make arrests. The individuals involved in the 9/24/09 arrest which has appeared online are law enforcement officers from a multi-agency tactical response team assigned to the security operations for the G20. It is not unusual for tactical team members to wear camouflaged fatigues. The type of fatigues the officers wear designates their unit affiliation.

Continued:

“G20 security officials took responsibility Friday afternoon for a video that seemed to depict US troops ‘kidnapping’ a protester.”

Special ops use those uniforms all the time.They are called multi cam TRU. Why the HELL do the cops need camo for crowd control? this leads one to believe that these goons were military special ops from NORTHCOM, FBI/ATF/DEA/DHS,Federal Marshals or a number of any of the police state goons that think they are upholding the rule of law. Hitler, Joe Stalin and Mao would be so proud. we can’t even protest in the steets any more. The U.S.A. is dead. Welcome to the New World Order!

The statement released by the G20 says these are law enforcement officers from a “multi agency tactical response team”.

No matter what the situation…I HIGHLY object as an American citizen to being swept away & arrested by a group of law enforcement officers that I cannot identify. Of course we have not seen the whole video, but where are the badges? Where do they identify themselves & identify by what authority they are essentially abducting this man?

Uniforms & ID’s are VITAL for American citizens so they can easily know who they are dealing with. You cannot cooperate with a group of thugs dragging you off when you are not sure who they are or what authority they have. How terrifying.

As a woman, I am even leary of police cars & uniforms, and will always make sure that I stop in a well populated area & that the car pulling me over is well marked. A family friend was raped & murdered by a man posing as an officer. He used a white car & red light to pull her over in a rural area.

This is not okay. This security team needs to have well defined uniforms and badges. If they have to come out and make a statement to identify these men, then they have seriously blown it.

well simply put anytime you see a video that is perfectly in frame……..red flags should be flying, besides the fact the uniforms were improper, and anyone can find a ford ltd(pssst you never saw the license tag a major clue not seen in the video) but the tactics and physical movements of “military respondents” are entirely wrong to anyone who’s been involved with these kinds of actions or any police officer. point one, they drive into frame(remember this is a stage propaganda piece) from the right from the rear of the protesters where apparently a smoke bomb had been staged to go off to the left where the “target” of the protest was focused? convenient i’d say, for a staged video. well they pick up this guy who almost seems to be laughing, but the kicker to it all is the driver. point two, never in military or terrorist respondent do they train the driver of the vehicle to relinquish control of his vehicle but instead he should be scanning the situation in preparation for a safe exit, but the driver opens the door in the panic to do what? absolutely opposite to all logical training, unless you are a college protester trying to push a faked video to en cite other useful idiots. third point, who is the goof ball guy walking around with the assault weapon like a kid lost at the county fair. this is a great piece of propaganda made by kids who watched a lot of tv and knew nothing of real military ops. finally they drive off, into and beside the apparent incendiary device(ie smoke bomb this reminds me i need to stop at a truck stop and get some fireworks for new years) that’s generating the smoke. none of these actions make sense and are in fact absolutely against military training. this was suck a faked phony video shot by people that knows nothing but what they grew up watching tv.

stockcar14fan,

This is about as real as it gets.

Read this again.

“Military members supporting the G20 Summit work with local law enforcement authorities but do not have the authority to make arrests. The individuals involved in the 9/24/09 arrest which has appeared online are law enforcement officers from a multi-agency tactical response team assigned to the security operations for the G20. It is not unusual for tactical team members to wear camouflaged fatigues. The type of fatigues the officers wear designates their unit affiliation.”

really racerx where did you see identification? thanks for pointing out a non point and ignoring everything else i pointed out. anything else you want to debate on the rest of the points i made about the phoniness of this staged event. and just so you know i’ve been involved in various situations like this, and that’s not that real, sorry but you’re wrong. why because i said so. answer me this if it’s so real, why aren’t the guys wearing their gear? they are only wearing simple *unidentified* uniforms that you can buy at any mil surplus store, but they aren’t wearing any gear at all, belts with batons, tac lights, etc, etc, etc, in an active riot situation where apparently some explosive device has gone off and these guys are completely unprepared? by the way, the military is not allowed to work the streets of america as police officers.

No doubt stockcar14fan is a Pentagon(Pentagram) PSYOPS “warrior” or just your run of the mill Faux “News” watching, moronic, Koolaid drinker.
Do a little research MORON! The 3rd Infantry Division 1st Brigade Combat Team, U.S. Army, has been assigned to NORTHCOM for “Homeland Security” operations.
Here is the army’s 3rd ID in the uniform those 2 thugs were wearing.the uniform is made by Crye Precision and is called MultiCam™ TRU.
[url]http://strikehold.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/gen-ii-multicam-cp-3.jpg[/url]
Also, let’s not overlook the fact that the G20 Joint Operation Center said that these were their guys from the “Joint Operatinal Multi-Juridictional Task Force”, which includes members of the 3rd ID(CCMRF/NORTHCOM).

My son is in the military and all military wear their pants tucked into the boot. Boots are tan. So these are not military men at all.

My son is in the military and all military wear their pants tucked into the boot. Boots are tan. So these are not military men at all. There is no flag on the right shoulder of the uniform sleeve.

Wow… that was inappropriate.

Not fake, the car drove right threw the gas.

racerx: You’re a fookin’ idiot.
To the rest of you who are still confused: The caption never said anything about the arresting officers being military personnel. The car is an unmarked Crown Vic – typical cop car. The douche-bag being hauled away was seen vandalizing stores and deserved to have his butt kicked before being arrested but the officers showed restraint. Hope he has to personally pay back every dime of damaged he caused and gets a criminal record as well.

Apologies to racerx. I meant to post that rhall is a fookin’ idiot.

lmfao,you’re a fookin’ moron! The G20″joint information center” said these guys were from “a multi-agency tactical response team assigned to the security operations for the G20.” That would include the 3rd infantry division 1st combat brigade.Read this article from the Army Times:

Army Combat Team to Train for “Homeland Scenarios” Under NorthCom

Gina Cavallaro
Army Times
September 18, 2008

The 3rd Infantry Division’s 1st Brigade Combat Team has spent 35 of the last 60 months in Iraq patrolling in full battle rattle, helping restore essential services and escorting supply convoys.

Now they’re training for the same mission — with a twist — at home.

Beginning Oct. 1 for 12 months, the 1st BCT will be under the day-to-day control of U.S. Army North, the Army service component of Northern Command, as an on-call federal response force for natural or manmade emergencies and disasters, including terrorist attacks.

This new mission marks the first time an active unit has been given a dedicated assignment to NorthCom, a joint command established in 2002 to provide command and control for federal homeland defense efforts and coordinate defense support of civil authorities.

In the meantime, they’ll learn new skills, use some of the ones they acquired in the war zone and more than likely will not be shot at while doing any of it.

They may be called upon to help with civil unrest and crowd control or to deal with potentially horrific scenarios such as massive poisoning and chaos in response to a chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear or high-yield explosive, or CBRNE, attack.

The 1st BCT’s soldiers also will learn how to use “the first ever nonlethal package that the Army has fielded,” 1st BCT commander Col. Roger Cloutier said, referring to crowd and traffic control equipment and nonlethal weapons designed to subdue unruly or dangerous individuals without killing them.

“It’s a new modular package of nonlethal capabilities that they’re fielding. They’ve been using pieces of it in Iraq, but this is the first time that these modules were consolidated and this package fielded, and because of this mission we’re undertaking we were the first to get it.”

The package includes equipment to stand up a hasty road block; spike strips for slowing, stopping or controlling traffic; shields and batons; and, beanbag bullets.

The brigade will not change its name, but the force will be known for the next year as a CBRNE Consequence Management Response Force, or CCMRF (pronounced “sea-smurf”).

“I can’t think of a more noble mission than this,” said Cloutier, who took command in July. “We’ve been all over the world during this time of conflict, but now our mission is to take care of citizens at home … and depending on where an event occurred, you’re going home to take care of your home town, your loved ones.”

“If we go in, we’re going in to help American citizens on American soil,restore normalcy and support whatever local agencies need us to do, so it’s kind of a different role,” said Cloutier, who on the last rotation, learned of the homeland mission a few months ago while they were still in Iraq.”

All of you idiots don’t need to defend Bush anymore, he and obama are two sides of the same worthless coin. Wake up and smell the tear gas!

Great article, HeyKoolaid. How were you able to uncover this evidence of the Army “helping with civil unrest and crowd control?”
Here is a picture of the “3rd ID” in Multicam TRU, the same uniform as those Nazi/Commie, thugs.
http://strikehold.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/gen-ii-multicam-cp-3.jpg

Now ask yourself lmfao, why would any cop need to wear camo in a crowd control situation in a city? Face the facts that obamais just using the “tools” put in place by the last 2 administations.

Just like buddy bush said, ” the constitution is just a G.. Damn piece of paper!”

So the officers aren’t US military but are the officers US or foreign troops/police?
This story still needs more explanation.

Come on people …so I got the car wrong…..
Still does not change the fact that this was staged and TOTALLY FAKE !!!!!!!!

Wait, if these aren’t military, then why does the guy’s armband say “MP”???

SCARY STUFF!!!

People READ THIS CAREFULLY!! I understand most of you have never been in the military, and have been watching V for Vendetta way too much, but if there were any special ops running around detaining people they would not be in a uniform. Military police are not allowed to detain civilians, so if they were gonna break this rule, they would certainly not advertise they are military police.

Obama’s thugs denying the civil rights of these protestors. If you look closely at the video you can see an ACORN brochure laying on the back seat of the vehicle. I also saw on the vehicles rear a bumper sticker that read “Change we can beleive in”.

Why does everyone assume they are military just because they have BDU’s on? You can buy BDU’s from any surplus store. So quit trying to explain the video is fake based on the fact they don’t wear their BDU like the military branches. Who cares if you were military or you know someone who is military, it doesn’t make you an expert on who wears BDU’s or Cammies. If you read the caption under the video which explains what you are viewing which stated they are “law enforcement officers from a multi-agency tactical response team assigned to the security operations for the G20″ you might not type something ignorant. What should you be more concerned about, what they are wearing or what they did?

Good Grief! Even after the G-20 Joint Information Center verifies the authenticity of this footage, tha Faux News/Rethugs keep denying… Deny. Deny. Deny. They don’t need no stinkin’ facts. According to them, all news is opinion-based.
Please read the article again.
- – -
Statement from G-20 Joint Information Center to College Politico: The individuals involved in the 9/24/2009 arrest which has appeared online are law enforcement officers from a multi-agency tactical response team assigned to the security operations for the G20.
- – -
Now, really? Was that so hard?

I guess rhall didn’t watch the video which clearly states they are police officers not military.

“What, a liberal anti-capitalist Democrat, a friend of Obama got arrested? What’s the big deal, a liberal fascist got arrested. Lock him up, make him pay for damages and that’s – GOOD.”

Umm, Fascism is extreme RIGHT. How in the world can you be a Liberal Fascist???? You sir, are an idiot…. Stupid, moronic, Regan/Bush lackeys need to read a book every once in a while.

Post a Comment