C’mon now Quitter, that ain’t porn! You gotta go to the deep south in the bible belt to get the good porn, bestiality, incest, and the kidi stuff too. Everyone knows the red states lead the way in online porn subscriptions. Show’n your willy behind a hockey stick ain’t porn you silly woman….
DEMOCRATSCUMNovember 16th, 2009 - 11:16 pm
We are scared to death that Palin will defeat our progressive idol Bar rock Hue sane Obaaa maaaa
testicular manNovember 16th, 2009 - 11:20 pm
CON… sounds like you got the hots for that smurmy dweeb…
SubjectoftheUSSANovember 16th, 2009 - 11:22 pm
He may as well cash in now, everyone will just be laughing at this guy the rest of his life
ShioriNovember 16th, 2009 - 11:27 pm
CON:
Porn is short for pornography.
Pornography – “The representation in books, magazines, photographs, films, and other media of scenes of sexual behavior that are erotic or lewd and are designed to arouse sexual interest.”
Only drooling, depraved liberals lack the intelligence and moral sense to be able to define lewd material. While a photo of a nude can be art, Playgirl and the like depict nudes for the express purpose of sexual stimulation. May not always be objectionable, but it’s still pornography.
And the red states do not ‘lead in porn subscriptions’ – but people in the blue states do star in them.
Now why don’t you get out of your mom’s basement and get crackin’ on your mandated door-to-door sex-offender notification route. You’re obligated by the State, after all.
IceCream RoverNovember 17th, 2009 - 12:16 am
As a progressive I don’t think weshould be calling this lady names. We would not like it if Conservatives treated one of our ladies the way some in the coorporate media and celebrities treat this lady. I would not vote for her if she ran against Barack Hussein Obama, but I was raised to treat ladies better than my fellow progressives treat her.
IceCream RoverNovember 17th, 2009 - 12:16 am
As a progressive I don’t think we should be calling this lady names. We would not like it if Conservatives treated one of our ladies the way some in the coorporate media and celebrities treat this lady. I would not vote for her if she ran against Barack Hussein Obama, but I was raised to treat ladies better than my fellow progressives treat her.
Johnny USANovember 17th, 2009 - 12:45 am
Here’s the deal:
1. The “book/interview tour” that Sarah Palin is doing, is not the type of venue where Palin will show her chops. They are helpful for showing her stance on a variety of policy issues, but the real-deal will be when the America people see rousing speeches being televised of her, rallying the crowds with aggressive determination…if Palin decides to run.
2. If Palin decides to run, she will have to prove herself to America by challenging and debating the rest of the Republican contenders. The media will certainly not prop-up Sarah, like they did, and still do, Barack Obama. If Sarah Palin wants to get the American people behind her, then she is going to have to decide, dig down deep, and go from grass-roots, all the way to the top. I believe if her team aggressively polishes-her-solid, on all the issues, and if she can come out with bold determination on those issues, it will silence many of her critics on both sides of the isle, and get the American people behind her.
3. Palin scares the left because they know she can beat Barack Obama. If they are so sure she couldn’t, they would ignore her, and not comment on her at all. They would just let her “destroy” the Republican party and go down in defeat. Notice that the liberals/progressives/democrats are not ignoring her. She scares some in the republican establishment because she is not the “country-club-republican” type. She is more down to earth, like most Americans.
4. Conservatives would not give a loser even a fraction of this amount of attention. We would quietly high-five each other, and happily wait for the train-wreck.
5. Palin exposes the radical feminists, like Nancy Pelosi, Barbara Boxer, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, etc… for what they are: whiney, victimized, over-entitled-wind-bags, who don’t represent most American women.
Liberals cannot stand the thought of the first female President of the United States being a conservative female, like Thatcher, who upstages the radical feminists.
RobertBNovember 17th, 2009 - 1:26 am
Come on, folks. Lets be realistic. This Levi clown is dumber than a stump, not to mention a grade-a douchebag. I don’t think he even finished high school. The only future he has is either a career in porn, or a membership in a liberal think tank.
JanaNovember 17th, 2009 - 1:39 am
Although I have respect for Sarah Palin for her accomplishments as Mayor, and Governor in Alaska, I have to confess that I do see her as ready to take on the job of President of the United States. She has a great folksy charm, and unlike others who bash her intelligence, I do believe she is intelligent, but she is obviously not ready as her current interview with Oprah indicates.
If she is serious about re-entering into politics, she should run for a seat in Congress, or the House first. It is true she was treated brutally by the press, but all it take is a few comments like “I can see Russia from Alaska” to keep her in the ditch. For some reason Biden can get away with stuff like that, (one- because he is a liberal, (two- may be because he had a stroke a while back and some figure he lost a few brain cells from it.
I think she would be a great fund raiser, and celebrity speaker, but when I heard her interview with Oprah talking about the Katie Couric interview, as likable as she was, she still did not come across as rock solid, and strong in her replies as she should have. Oprah goads her “Do you now wish you would have mentioned a few magazines?” and Palin says: “Yes, of course I do”
She should have simply replied, I would have done many things different in that interview, and would not have allowed Katie to take it in that direction. Instead she gave excuses about being pumped up after a rally. Her book is doing well, she should continue with the fund raising, but stay off the ticket in 2012.
JanaNovember 17th, 2009 - 1:42 am
Levi is being propped up by the liberal media as an embarrassment for Sarah Palin. As soon as they are through getting the mileage out of him, he will find the interview offers have dried up, and his show business prospects flown south for the winter.
RogerCfromSDNovember 17th, 2009 - 1:50 am
How I look forward to Palin being President. After the utter ineptitude and corruption of the past ten months under Obama, Progressives have absolutely no way of justifying their contempt for her. But, being the moonbats that they are, they’ll continue to attack a lady who is way out of their league.
FastFactsNovember 17th, 2009 - 1:54 am
Levi has destroyed his whole credibility and is selling himself for popularity. Though in the long run you never really return from doing any type of porn. Remember people use those pictures over your head and you can’t get into politics, business, government, or others because your competitors will use it against you. The left is using him as a weapon against Palin and will toss him to the curb after they are done with him.
SOURCE: http://www.americanparchment.com
markNovember 17th, 2009 - 3:01 am
I’m sure what Levi has is perfectly fine….but heartbreaking?
I’ll be the judge of that.
PLEASE, THINK OF AMERICA FIRST, NOT YOURSELF, SARAH!November 17th, 2009 - 3:48 am
Someone wrote, “she should continue with the fund raising, but stay off the ticket in 2012.”
Exactly. She is a big draw as a SPEAKER; she’s actually fun to listen to because she has such doggone PERKY ENTHUSIASM! But if she runs for Prez, afraid she’ll guarantee another four years for the jug-eared O-man. PLEASE, Sarah! Do yourself & America a favor, and DO NOT PRESUME YOU ARE PRESIDENTIAL MATERIAL! We need you to help BOOST a VIABLE CANDIDATE, but SORRY: “It ain’t you, babe!”
REMEMBER THE CAMPAIGN SLOGAN, “AMERICA FIRST!”
lookingatthedetailsNovember 17th, 2009 - 5:14 am
Ok, but who is Sarah suppose to “BOOST” up?
Who’s a better candidate?
Better step up soon as the other side has the LSM all sewn up for their side and the REP’s have no one else in the wings do they?
Think SHE is the one to decided if she’s qualified to run, then the voters will decide if she’s what they want.
After all the people did pick Obama … how can it be worse than this?
At least she loves America.
CommonSenseNovember 17th, 2009 - 7:32 am
Stop listening to the Media Types that willingly listen to a jacka.ss like Levi to try and tear down someone like Palin. I’d take Sarah over any other Democrat EVER!
KNovember 17th, 2009 - 9:46 am
You can almost feel the trembling going on from the dems on this board. They are freaking FRIGHTENED of Sarah Palin! So you know she’s doing something RIGHT!
Not ready to run for President? Give me a break! Are you k-i-d-d-i-n-g me? As if the groveler-in-chief playing house right now is? Ha! Keep dreaming! How’s that “change” working out for you?
This woman, Sarah Palin, LOVES & ADORES our country. She will kick butt Hussein Obama in 2012. There is no doubt about that!
PALIN 2012!
HaHaHa!November 17th, 2009 - 11:32 am
Levi’s porn aspirations are heartbreaking? How about banging your daughter?
+Cloud+November 17th, 2009 - 11:51 am
What Levi is doing is definitely porn. Palin is coming out the classier person.
IceCream RoverNovember 17th, 2009 - 2:11 pm
IceCream Rover November 17th, 2009 – 12:16 am
As a progressive I donβt think we should be calling this lady names. We would not like it if Conservatives treated one of our ladies the way some in the coorporate media and celebrities treat this lady. I would not vote for her if she ran against Barack Hussein Obama, but I was raised to treat ladies better than my fellow progressives treat her.
This is a imposter and not the real IceCream Rover, I would never vote or suport Palin. A true intelectual progresive would never vote for a Palin. See this is the kind of thing Palin lovers will do impostering and trying to pretend to be someone else and saying untruths while acting stupidley.
Haha!November 17th, 2009 - 2:40 pm
We can’t wait for the video of Levi and Bristol doing the nasty. Now that’s porn.
Kyler8November 17th, 2009 - 3:24 pm
Palin is the poster child for all the hick functionally-illiterate Americans the GOP covet so much.
markNovember 17th, 2009 - 6:21 pm
Levi didn’t even go FULL MONTY. His increasing the number of Palins, while not pornographic is OBSCENE.
C’mon now Quitter, that ain’t porn! You gotta go to the deep south in the bible belt to get the good porn, bestiality, incest, and the kidi stuff too. Everyone knows the red states lead the way in online porn subscriptions. Show’n your willy behind a hockey stick ain’t porn you silly woman….