Palin: I’d Vote Newt In Nevada

Sarah Palin's thoughts on the Florida primary and the upcoming Nevada caucus.

February 1, 2012 at 12:37 am - Fox News
Dateline: Alaska
Lord_Nibbler   February 1st, 2012 - 12:55 am

I wish I understood Palin's support. She is principled and consistent – two thing Gingrich is not. Also, everyone needs to look at an electoral map before they keep parroting that Mr. Sourpuss is going to kick ass and beat Obama. I think and hope that any of our candidates will win, but I think we are being silly to think that he is the strongest because he acts tough.

Niner   February 1st, 2012 - 1:02 am

The two FOX bozos, Megan Kelly and Dough boy Brett Bair were trying to instigate and bait Sarah so they could get some type of scoop, Sarah wasnt falling for it. Run Sarah Run!

max_kain   February 1st, 2012 - 1:09 am

Wonder if Reid's cabal is planning any shenanigans…

CheesecakeLarry   February 1st, 2012 - 1:25 am

Palin, the Tea Party. What are they seeing that I'm not???

ShawnSen   February 1st, 2012 - 1:27 am

Lord_Nibbler 108p · 30 minutes ago

I wish I understood Palin's support. She is principled and consistent – two thing Gingrich is not

___________________________________________________

Well, here it is in a nutshell………..ROMNEY is the WORST possible candidate to go up against Obama.
Any principled and consistent person can see that.

JamestheFin   February 1st, 2012 - 1:40 am

Exactly, and well stated. You want a preview of how it'll play out for former CEO Willard Romney running for POTUS when the US economy sucks?

Go look at how it turned out for former CEO Meg Whitman who ran for governor of California at a time when the California economy is dying. She lost. Badly. And she didn't have a tenth of the baggage Romney has with RomneyCare, flip-flopping, repudiating Reagan, and smearing a fellow Republican with the help of the Republican Establishment whilst simultaneously alienating the Tea Party, Evangelicals, social conservatives, and the Libertarian wing. And she was a mainline Protestant Christian, not a Mormon-be honest, that'll be an issue. And she was only running against Jerry Brown, a guy who already proven himself to be the worst governor in this history of California.

Yet, despite all of these seeming advantages, Whitman lost. Badly. Romney has none of these things going for him. It's gonna be ugly. I see how weak Mitt will be in the general. So does Gov. Palin. God bless her!!!

JamestheFin   February 1st, 2012 - 1:45 am

Yeah, that's my thought too. However, I think she'll sit this one out so the Republican Establishment can look even more foolish and stupid when Willard loses in the general to Obama. It actually sets her up quite nicely for later on.

I hope it doesn't happen eg Willard losing vs. Obama, for the sake of this nation, but Romney is a weak candidate, in some ways weaker than Newt, Rick, and Ron.

Billyb9   February 1st, 2012 - 1:47 am

You know it Mrs. Palin.

Why not go with Todd and make a full fledge endorsement? You get to a point to where you're not checking to see which way the wind is blowing and hammer down on a decision.

Gringrich has a little of the McShame Maverick in him, but his ability to think out of the box has improved the country in the past, not hindered its growth. I'm convinced of his passion for this country, and I'm confident of his ability to put together an administration that will actively lead this country to the success it has enjoyed in the past. Romney will maintain the status quo and hope a little luck will come his way.

Hooah!   February 1st, 2012 - 1:57 am

Harry Reid and Romney fan dance in Nevada for the moron vote.

quivive   February 1st, 2012 - 2:23 am

Since I can’t vote for you, Governor Palin, I’ll vote for the next best thing – Newt. A balanced budget would be nice right about now with healthy servings of reforms that lead to a limited government.

Dagney77   February 1st, 2012 - 2:36 am

Newt can't beat Obama because Newt's a creepy, lying, philandering, Washington insider. Sarah Palin's fifteen minutes of fame should have been up the minute she quit the governorship of Alaska.

Time to back the most conservative candidate who can win. Mitt Romney.

Billyb9   February 1st, 2012 - 2:41 am

So why not tell us how you really feel?

IronTigersVet   February 1st, 2012 - 3:30 am

Mittens is no where near conservative. You need to back up and re-check your facts.

Dagney77   February 1st, 2012 - 3:33 am

It's time to seriously take on Obama. I'm tired of servicing the egos of jerks like Newt and Palin. Let's fight Obama, not each other. Palin just likes to see herself on TV. She really has nothing to say.

TrueGrit   February 1st, 2012 - 3:50 am

The Nevada Moron vote is up for grabs between Reid and Romney. Magic!

TheLastBestHope   February 1st, 2012 - 4:01 am

For those who understand the political process. FL just decided who will be the GOP nominee.

It's now time to choose sides. Take a look at these faces and then tell me how 4 MORE YEARS sounds to ya. http://lastbesthope.sayanythingblog.com/2012/01/3...

SubVert Progress   February 1st, 2012 - 4:06 am

While I agree with the premise Conservatives are looking for someone to beat Obama down, I disagree with the idea that Newticles will be the one to do it. Sorry Sarah,
all signs point to NO

Off Dooty   February 1st, 2012 - 4:15 am

Look at me! Look at me!

Sarah "Also-ran" Palin

leslie_gaea   February 1st, 2012 - 4:16 am

Newt's obsession with the white house will drain the republican nominee out of much needed money to fight Obama in November. Newt has lost, but he and his billionaire friends and union backers will leave either Santorum or Romney bankrupt – through a 5 month slog match

Please Sarah, do what is right for the conservative movment and stop Newt. You can just as easily find a position in Romney's administration.

PushHereToFlush   February 1st, 2012 - 4:32 am

She told us why. She thinks the primary should continue and the issues debated more before a final candidate is chosen.

Mitt and Newt are equivalent in their ability to win over Obama because Obama is that bad.

It doesn't matter which wins. Congress and conservatives will have to ride herd over them.

KraZedSeXpooDle   February 1st, 2012 - 4:34 am

she is a real trooper

HookedOnObumbles   February 1st, 2012 - 4:38 am

"Let's fight Obama, not each other."

…as you call Newt and Palin jerks. Way to be consistent.

HookedOnObumbles   February 1st, 2012 - 4:45 am

You seriously think Flip Romney will be able to take on the Obumbles machine? All they have to do is keep banging away on Romneycare, and bring up the fact that ol' Flip was a progressive just a short 7 years ago, which will dishearten the conservative base.

Also they will bring up the fact that Flip appointed more Democrats for judges than Republicans.

Yea sure we should just close down the primaries now and anoint Flip Romney.

NAVYCHEF1   February 1st, 2012 - 5:07 am

What I do not understand is why did Sarah Palin (or her robots) blocked me off her facebook site when I reminded her that Gingrich supported Dede Scozzafava in NY 23 while she endorsed Hoffman (a Tea Party conservative), Newt mocked Paul Ryan's budget proposal as extreme right wing social engineering… I dont know how that can be called true conservatism (supporting liberals) and for the people (not balancing and capping the budget).
Needless to say, after years of hoping for Sarah to run and supporting her at every turn (even when she played with our hope for a presidential run all summer), I am very disappointed.

pma3568   February 1st, 2012 - 5:13 am

Hey Sarah, stop acting like a democrat because you can only vote in your own state. I was a fan but now I getting tired of your comments.

snarkwire   February 1st, 2012 - 5:15 am

Who will he pander to there? Navajo indians? Saying Mitt didn't serve Navajo food prepared correctly? LOL!

snarkwire   February 1st, 2012 - 5:16 am

Drain Mitt, sure. If you go with Ron Paul, you won't get Obama. Your choice.

snarkwire   February 1st, 2012 - 5:17 am

Why bother – nary a difference between Newt, Romney and Obama. All CFR members. It is Ron Paul or the country dies.

szysgt   February 1st, 2012 - 5:18 am

You betcha'

snarkwire   February 1st, 2012 - 5:18 am

If she keeps supporting McCain and Newt types, maybe you were wrong about her being principled and consistent? What led you to ever believe she was? Crafted images in the media?

snarkwire   February 1st, 2012 - 5:19 am

Mitt or Newt will lose to Obama.

szysgt   February 1st, 2012 - 5:19 am

Romney-bots are out in full force this morning!

longguy   February 1st, 2012 - 5:28 am

Sarah Palin has NOT endorsed Newt. What she wants is that the process continue. At this point, Romney is lacking. She and many others are hoping that the process will eventually determine the best cnadidate.

Narcissist Extremist   February 1st, 2012 - 5:49 am

Sarah is just fighting the good fight to save America. She knows Newts personal problems but also knows Mitt is not the answer to undo all the destruction wrought by Lucifer Obama.

MusicCityDawg   February 1st, 2012 - 5:52 am

If Newt had ANY real interest in a balanced budget, he would never have trashed Paul Ryan's plan which would do that very thing.

boyinboycott   February 1st, 2012 - 5:53 am

Cuz Caribou Barbies' support was SO helpful in Florida, otherwise Gingrich would have lost in double digits….HE DID…oh…nevermind

smoke ranch   February 1st, 2012 - 6:18 am

Sarah is getting old. Looks it too.

Libtard   February 1st, 2012 - 6:22 am

Time to back the … candidate who can win. Mitt Romney.

There… fixed that for you.

smoke ranch   February 1st, 2012 - 6:24 am

And Newt is a very dirty mop as well. He has all kinds of dirty laundry and dust skeletons in the coset. Just the kind of honest, Christian, family man Bill Clinton was. Ya right.

Big_Toe   February 1st, 2012 - 6:26 am

Who would Sarah vote for in Colorado? How about Texas? Minnesooooooota?
Somebody please ask before its too late…

Mrs.Tank   February 1st, 2012 - 6:27 am

I just do not understand Sarah's support of Gingrich, it baffles me to no end..

ATO86VTL   February 1st, 2012 - 6:31 am

That's the way I see it. Why is Pelosi trying to calm her freaks by assuring them that Newt will not win? Because they are scared to death of the conservative that boxed up the Clintons for 8 years.
On the other hand, they love Romney.

Mrs.Tank   February 1st, 2012 - 6:31 am

That did it. It's true, Romney's no Conservative but neither is Gingrich and I really do believe that Gingrich would be worse for our country.

Iamwitheileen   February 1st, 2012 - 6:33 am

This 'pretender' is starting to get under my skin! She supported…"manchurian candidate McCain…Bilderberg Perry and now CFR Newt!

Her judgment is flawed and it is a very good thing that she did not run and/or win in 2008!

She is extending her 15 mins of fame…and her proclaiming to be a 'real' conservative…yet not supporting the only 'real' conservative in this race…Rick Santorum…is hypocrisy at it's finest!

MY vote and that of a true and 'real' conservative…Michele Malkin will be with Rick Santorum…because 'we' vote our convictions and don't play cat n' mouse with the future of our children and our Republic!

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2012/01/30...

NOW LET US SUPPORT RICK SANTORUM WITH OUR MONEY AND OUR VOTE TO FIGHT THE NWO MONEY…FLOWING INTO ROMNEY!

https://transaxt.com/Donate/PTWALC/RickSantorumfo...

Mrs.Tank   February 1st, 2012 - 6:34 am

I am not a Romney fan by any stretch but IMO it wont really matter who our candidate is, the people are going to be voting AGAINST obama..It's anybody but obama at this point for most Americans.

Iamwitheileen   February 1st, 2012 - 6:36 am

Sarah 'the pretender' is wrong! CFR Newt is only becoming the ISSUE…as the only 'real' conservative in this race…Rick Santorum said!

What she is doing is extending her 15 mins of fame…and using her flawed judgment to stop the debating of the issues…by making CFR Newt the issue.

Instead of coming out…like Michele Malkin…a 'real' conservative and endorsing the only 'real' conservative…she is endorsing CFR Newt!
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2012/01/30...

GO AWAY SARAH YOU ARE DOING MORE DAMAGE THAN GOOD!

Iamwitheileen   February 1st, 2012 - 6:37 am

Yeah…run Sarah back to where you came from…because your judgment is flawed!

Iamwitheileen   February 1st, 2012 - 6:39 am

She is playing cat n' mouse as she did about running. She is extending her 15 mins of fame to use more of her flawed judgment to ruin the race of the only 'real' conservative…Rick Santorum that she should have endorsed over CFR Newt!

A 'real' conservative woman is Michele Malkin and she has endorsed him and so do I!
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2012/01/30...

GO AWAY SARAH!

Iamwitheileen   February 1st, 2012 - 6:40 am

Now you got it…CFR Newt and Sarah 'the pretender'…the same thing…both NOT 'real' conservatives!

Now do you get it?

Iamwitheileen   February 1st, 2012 - 6:43 am

Yeah…a trooper against 'real' conservatism!

If she was truly a 'real' conservative…she would not want this to go on…she would want the (2) best candidates to discuss and debate the issues for the remaining time…and one of them would not be CFR Newt!

MY vote and the vote of another 'real' conservative woman…Michele Malkin…go with Rick Santorum!

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2012/01/30...

GregKlug   February 1st, 2012 - 6:43 am

I'm not looking for my priest here, I'm looking for someone who doesn't back down when things get tough…..and they will get tough with this crew in Washington. Romney will fold like a cheap suit and Santorum hasn't garnered the hearts of enough of the electorate. Trust me, I understand he's not perfect – nor do I want him to be. Who did IKE turn to when he needed something done? Patton – the most revered AND despised leader ever in our military.

The war today is one of words and ideas about this country. Newt, in all his imperfections, is a proven stallwart on that front.

Iamwitheileen   February 1st, 2012 - 6:44 am

Ummmmm….because she doesn't like the truth…proving that she is a 'pretender' and NOT a 'real' conservative?

ruknuts   February 1st, 2012 - 6:44 am

She would do a basketball team in Alaska if it would get her a reality show.

Iamwitheileen   February 1st, 2012 - 6:45 am

Bravo…another recognizing the truth of what 'is…is'…Sarah the 'pretender'…just trying to squeeze more time out of her 15 mins!

Iamwitheileen   February 1st, 2012 - 6:46 am

Boy…take off those blinders! This should not go on like this…it is only HURTING the candidates and the party…period!

The issue is now becoming CFR Newt…as the only 'real' conservative has said…Rick Santorum!

If she were truly a 'real' conservative…she would want the issues discussed by the (2) top candidates…and CFR Newt would not be one of them!

MY vote and that of 'real' conservative Michele Malkin go with Rick Santorum…how about yours?
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2012/01/30...

Libtard   February 1st, 2012 - 6:48 am

How so?

Because of what he has said? (Newt's said some pretty stupid things, but go back and watch Mitt's Debate v. Kennedy and try to call him a Republican)

Because of what he did politically? (Newt's political record is really is strong suit– Mitt: ORomneyCare)
Or Because of what he did personally? (Newt is a disaster– yeah, he married his mistresses [better than Clinton], but it's ugly)

Iamwitheileen   February 1st, 2012 - 6:48 am

Hitler didn't back down either…neither did Castro or Lenin…you get my point. I am not comparing him to their character…only their determination…and that does not always make a great leader…but integrity and honor do!

MY vote and the vote of another 'real' conservative Michele Malkin goes to Rick Santorum!
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2012/01/30...

alwaysright5   February 1st, 2012 - 6:49 am

She will look bad supporting Mitt if or when he gets nominated.

Iamwitheileen   February 1st, 2012 - 6:49 am

I believe that was 'tongue in cheek'?

Duckwalker   February 1st, 2012 - 6:53 am

What Palin is doing in a sense reminds me of Limbaugh’s 08 ‘operation chaos’ she is less concerned about endorsing and more concerned in attempting to keep the process going so the candidates can be fully vetted.

Stinger18   February 1st, 2012 - 6:55 am

Guess what Sara? There is NO TEA PARTY candidate! Newt made sure of that. Paul Ryan was a rising star in the Republican party, a true fiscal conservative with real solutions. Sharp, charismatic, highly intellegent, and well spoken, Ryan had already proved he could he could go face to face with Obama and come out on top .

But just as Ryan stood up in the national spotlight, your buddy Newt cut him off at the knees and stabbed him in the back! The press had a field day with it! Newt the narcissist saw Paul Ryan as a threat to his run for the Presidency. The Iowa voter in the Youtube video had it right, what Newt did to Ryan was unforgivable, adding "Newt you're an embarrassment to our party" and "get out before you make a bigger fool of yourself". But Newt rolls on, attacking capitalism and lower taxes, promoting Moon colonies and Kosher foods for Holocaust survivors.

Iamwitheileen   February 1st, 2012 - 6:57 am

It was dangerous when Limbaugh did it…and it is still dangerous. No one should ever tamper with our voting process and it is now causing major problems in our election!

No one should want this process to go on as it is…if they truly love America…because it is destroying the candidates and the party…instead of focusing on the issues.

Rick Santorum said it best…when 'he' said that CFR Newt was NOW the issue…and he is RIGHT!

Rick has MY vote and that of another 'real' conservative woman…Michele Malkin!
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2012/01/30...

MarxTards   February 1st, 2012 - 7:01 am

I JUST HAD to come on and see how many of the Soros Media Matters 'pay for posts' crowd would be commenting. Thus far, looks like the majority. You people are amazingly stupid. Sarah Palin will be put in charge of dismantling the EPA, so get used to it, Libtards.

Iamwitheileen   February 1st, 2012 - 7:01 am

You are right…in some areas…like CFR Newt backstabbing Ryan…as she did with Rep Bachmann and the only 'real' conservative in the race…Rick Santorum…when she told SC to vote for CFR Newt! Seems like backstabbing is what Sarah 'the pretender' likes to do…because it extends her 15 mins of fame!

MY vote and that of another 'real' conservative woman…go against Sarah…the 'pretender…Michele Malkin and I vote for Rick Santorum the only 'real' conservative in this race!

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2012/01/30...

cothel   February 1st, 2012 - 7:02 am

Sister Sarah wants folks to vote for Newt. This indicates either, she's become a Democrat who wants an Obama 2nd term, or she's much dumber than even I thought.

Stinger18   February 1st, 2012 - 7:07 am

She's done EVERYTHING but endorse Newt, including having her HUSBAND endorse him! She doesn't want to fully endorse Newt, knowing he may implode at any minute, and bring her along with him. As for the "process to continue"? Thats BS, as the infighting continues to tarnish the Republican brand and is bringing down poll numbers across the board.

TxDude   February 1st, 2012 - 7:10 am

"Sarah Palin's thoughts" Funny.
Bored of you Sarah.

Duckwalker   February 1st, 2012 - 7:18 am

Like 08, I don’t see this as harmful, and I don’t see the process as being tampered with, but rather the candidates getting fully vetted. Which, I don’t have a problem with.

Obama will be looking in every orifice of the GOP candidate to flush out the dirt. It is better we bring our guy fully vetted and prepared to face Obama’s billion dollar war chest and state run media.

JoeKidd   February 1st, 2012 - 7:18 am

I respect Palin but I’d vote Santorum in Nevada (if I could).

There are a lot of “what if’s” in the following read but most of America still hasn‘t spoken…
William Kristol writes: What if Santorum does as well or better than Gingrich in the Nevada caucuses Saturday, or in the Minnesota and Colorado caucuses next Tuesday? What if Santorum is competitive with Romney in the Missouri beauty contest primary next Tuesday, where Gingrich isn't on the ballot? Couldn't non-Romney voters begin to move nationally from Gingrich to Santorum? Couldn't populist and Tea Party leaders like Sarah Palin do so as well? http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/santorums-cha...

PS- Like I said, of the candidates still running, Santorum gets my vote.
Of course, I will support whoever runs against Obama. :)

outofworkrose   February 1st, 2012 - 7:22 am

Sarah, I am sorry you are backing the wrong horse! I know you have said you are "not endorsing" anyone yet, but please call it what ever you want to. You are endorsing Newt. NEWT IS UNELECTABLE! Newt is a bombastic, offensive WHINY LITTLE BABY! He sounds just like WHINY LITTLE BABY residing at the White House. If Newt can not handle the "carpet bombing" he received from Mitt; does he think Obama is going to go easy on him? Grow up! Also, this B.S. about him running as an "outsider" and "raging against the machine". GIVE ME A BREAK! HE IS THE MACHINE; HE IS ONLY AN "OUTSIDER", BECAUSE HE PISSED OFF EVERYONE IN HIS OWN PARTY! Please wake up Sarah you are starting to sound as whiny as Newt.

Iamwitheileen   February 1st, 2012 - 7:22 am

There are other ways to vet…and that is through research and getting informed through many venues. And the debates are great for vetting…but coming out and using your influence to influence the continuance of the butchery taking place now…between the top (2) so called candidates…is harmful not only to the voting process but to the candidates themselves and the party…period.

And both Palin and Limbaugh should know better…and never started playing that game where all lose!

Iamwitheileen   February 1st, 2012 - 7:24 am

'Pretender" Sarah is a divider and not a united…isn't that what we have in our White House now?

MY vote and that of another 'real' conservative women…Michele Malkin will go the only 'real' conservative…Rick Santorum!

He will have our vote….because we stand with our CONVICTIONS and don't play 'russian roulette' with the future of our children and our Republic!
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2012/01/30...

sulmak   February 1st, 2012 - 7:31 am

Way too many names I haven't seen before.

sofakingmad   February 1st, 2012 - 7:34 am

EXACTLY

Duckwalker   February 1st, 2012 - 7:35 am

Tell me what is so wrong with vetting? Unlike the liberals, conservatives are not kool-aid drinking sheep that can't think for themselves. Conservative can handle all the good and bad and figure out what is true and what is BS.

Liberals can't handle the truth, conservatives can and welcome it. Nobody said this was going to be easy or fun, but too much is at stake, and if Obama is going to be defeated we need to stay steps ahead of him and his mini army waiting to take down their opponent.

sofakingmad   February 1st, 2012 - 7:36 am

like the nwt nuts at night?
time for newt and sarah to go home….their crap is getting old

sofakingmad   February 1st, 2012 - 7:36 am

again, you are correct

sofakingmad   February 1st, 2012 - 7:39 am

she is trying to stay relevant
too late

howardrourk   February 1st, 2012 - 7:39 am

I don't understand why people care to hear what she has to say anymore. Her political analysis is pedestrian at best. Much ado about nothing I'm afraid.

Big_Toe   February 1st, 2012 - 7:45 am

Yeah I keep it there most of the time… lol

Dagney77   February 1st, 2012 - 7:45 am

Listen to Palin. She's not even as intelligent as the average commenter on Breitbart. Then Newt – with Calista smiling and nodding at his side like the village idiot – compares himself to Lincoln and the signers of the Declaration? ? I don't think so.

Time for the fight of our lives. Let's get it on. These two attention hogs are an embarrassing distraction.

democratsarefools   February 1st, 2012 - 7:46 am

Palin seems to have tough time going all the way. Hey hubby endorsed Newt. Is she holding back because Newt may make another major blunder [after attacking Bain and Capitalism].

thebritishRcomg   February 1st, 2012 - 7:48 am

Sarah looks like a decoy now. If she were really a conservative she would vote Santorum! Newt of all people is worse than old Johnny McCain! She so wants payback for herself against the GOP, that she'll support the grand daddy of them all NEWT! Really Sarah. Really?!

broadgauge   February 1st, 2012 - 7:57 am

So media-hound Palin is trying to stretch out her visibility on Fox one primary at a time? nice.

greekelk   February 1st, 2012 - 8:01 am

I have to thank Sarah for helping me to decide how to vote down here in FL. She quit as Governor of AK, has become a media hound, won't endorse anyone at this point — now she want us to vote for Newt to continue this waste of millions of dollars which could be used to fight Obama. I was a toss up – but was leaning to Newt but after listening to her — I voted for Mitt. Mitt/Rubio 2012

quivive   February 1st, 2012 - 8:02 am

Facts are stubborn things, Newt’s record is concrete. We had 4 balanced budgets when he was speaker. He has a plan to get us back there. It’s folly to say suddenly as president he would do something different. Just as much as the Romney supporters tell us he’ll be a conservative as president. I support Dr. Paul’s balanced budget approach. If Newt got elected some of Paul’s agenda would see the light of day. The same cannot be said if Romney were to get elected. However, it is a moot point as the moderate superpacman has the wind at his back for the nomination, but a wall of kryptonite standing in his way for the national election.

PushHereToFlush   February 1st, 2012 - 8:03 am

You're a real dummy. Sarah Pailin is trying very hard to get Rick Santorum elected. The best way for Rck to win is to let Newt and Romney ruin each other over pettiness while Rick sticks to the high road and has more time to get exposure and debate participation. If Newt drops out, Romney has it right now.

My oh my, how short-sighted some people are.

shanedo2   February 1st, 2012 - 8:10 am

They both believe in an 'open marriage'.

Iamwitheileen   February 1st, 2012 - 8:10 am

You know with thinking like you just exhibited in your comment…it is no wonder you are a fan of 'pretender' Sarah!

FLUSHED….again!

Iamwitheileen   February 1st, 2012 - 8:12 am

Did you even bother to 'read' my comment?

Enough said!

Iamwitheileen   February 1st, 2012 - 8:13 am

She is the one who is looking foolish and stupid…and making everyone glad she and 'manchurian candidate' McCain didn't win!

PushHereToFlush   February 1st, 2012 - 8:14 am

Nope. Obama is a danger to most and a disappointment to his supporters. He's going down in a landslide loss.

PushHereToFlush   February 1st, 2012 - 8:15 am

You really don't want Santorum to win, do you?

ruknuts   February 1st, 2012 - 8:19 am

OMG before or after its abolished??? Stupid starts with the letter Sarah.

quivive   February 1st, 2012 - 8:19 am

Try to be more diplomatic Eileen if you want people to vote for Santorum – everyone isn’t the enemy. Sadly, he has less of a chance than Newt of beating Romney. The establishment hopes he stays in the race to continue to split the conservative vote. Superpacman Romney is going to win by de facto.

ruknuts   February 1st, 2012 - 8:20 am

Sarah, just pull the lever D to vote.

gorkisadork   February 1st, 2012 - 8:21 am

She is brilliant.

Dagney77   February 1st, 2012 - 8:22 am

Newt's "personal problems" are so huge that they disqualify him. He knows this. If he loved his country he would withdraw from the field. But Newt loves only Newt.

ShawnSen   February 1st, 2012 - 8:24 am

Because you are blinded by your mormonism

PJ3usa   February 1st, 2012 - 8:24 am

I feel the same. I like Sarah Palin & wanted her for President. Her support of Newt is perplexing. Perhaps she believes like many do, that we need some master debator to beat Obama in a debate to win the presidency. I had that thought to until I realized that the ABO factor will be the most important factor in this election. Most of us have decided we would vote for ANYONE that is the nominee. We've said we would vote for our dogs before we would let Obama back in. So the ABO factor (Anyone But Obama) is the major force behind the vote for the nominee. Not a winning debate. Regardless of the outcome of a debate with Obama, we will be voting the nominee due to ABO factor. Any liberal or democrat will not be swayed by any debate win against obama by the nominee. Any middle of the road person so confused they don't see the damage Obama has done, will not be swayed by any debate win. So ABO factor is going to matter more than debate ability. And it is IMPORTANT we pick a CONSERVATIVE to be the nominee. So I hope Sarah gives this aspect of ABO factor some consideration. It has helped me see the status of this race more clearly.

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.