If a man love me, he will keep my words – Jesus – John 14:23
Obammy is not a Christian, Obammy calls good that which God calls evil.
Isaiah 5:20 Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!
dontflagmebroOctober 11th, 2009 - 1:36 am
The policy is just so they don’t grab ass and hit on people on duty. Or talk like they are the opposite sex on duty. This is only going to hurt morale and recruitment. He’s pushing for a Draft. I think the whole 40,000 troops request is a fake ruse cooked up (cause Obama changed airpower rules and put in a ground general) but the WH to push the dollar down and create draft so they can get some dumb troops in there that will follow there unconstitutional orders.
Eileen for Freedom/LibertyOctober 11th, 2009 - 1:38 am
America…this is as bad an idea as putting women on submarines with men!
Not only working to destroy our economy…he is also working on destroying our armed forces!
=============================
THE REVOLUTION OF THE SILENT MAJORITY – SILENT NO MORE!
1. GETTING INFORMED
2. GETTING INVOLVED
DON’T TREAD ON US…WE PAY YOUR BILLS IN WASHINGTON AND IN YOUR HOMES WHERE YOU WILL ALL BE GOING STARTING IN 2010 AND BEYOND…GUARANTEED!
IMPEACHMENT OR THE ‘ORIGINAL’ KENYAN BIRTH CERTIFICATE…IT IS JUST A MATTER OF TIME!
HOW MUCH TIME DO WE HAVE LEFT, AMERICA?
Early CuylerOctober 11th, 2009 - 2:26 am
I really don’t mind if openly gay people serve in the military. As long as there is no health care “reform”, cap and trade, gay marriage, or amnesty for illegals, I am fine with this.
SIBKISSOctober 11th, 2009 - 2:36 am
OBAMA, WHEN ARE YOU GOING TO “COME OUT”? Larry, Donald and who else knows?
ShioriOctober 11th, 2009 - 2:52 am
Female recruits do not share barracks and showers with male recruits, and should not. But, we’re supposed to make special concessions for openly gay men? Here’s the point libs – if you’re gay and you want to serve your country, God Bless you, and thank you. But…
IT’S NOT ABOUT YOU! IT’S NOT ABOUT YOUR SEXUAL PREFERENCE – IT’S ABOUT PUTTING YOUR OWN INTERESTS ASIDE FOR YOUR COUNTRY! Your sexual preference is not the sum total of your identity either. The military is already burdened with too many lawsuits brought by women, do they really need more special needs soldiers with a penchant for litigation? Do we really need to make the vast majority of strait soldiers uncomfortable? Not ‘homophobic’ – uncomfortable; just like female soldiers would feel if they had to share showers and toilets with men. Is there a great movement of females lobbying for the right to share barracks with males that I’m not aware of? So many gays have already served in all wars, many were highly decorated, all were courageous. Were they screaming ‘I’m Gay!” No – because it is irrelevant. Their bravery had zero to do with who they slept with.
This is not about ‘civil rights’ – this is about special rights. And if a gay person really loves his/her country enough to enlist, and it does take a great love, they would realize, like those who went before them, that “Don’t ask, Don’t Tell” is no sacrifice at all to make for your country and fellow soldiers.
Obama doesn't know MilitaryOctober 11th, 2009 - 3:39 am
Obama has no idea what it is like to be in the military and does not understand the day to day efforts of the soldier. He is not able to make a decision on be half of the military of a Christian Nation.
If he does this he will be destroying a structure in place for more than a 100 years. He is a self centered, that will put the life a soldier on the line to gain favor.
UNWAVERING COMMITMENTOctober 11th, 2009 - 4:06 am
UNWAVERING????? Has ANYthing about this guy been UNWAVERING??
Hey, EILEEN!October 11th, 2009 - 4:38 am
Hi Eileen,
Thought you’d enjoy this, found on another site:
“(Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he’s just “PRES__ENT” Obama = Without “ID”)”
HAHAHAHAHAH!
CHUCKLE!
:-D
Hey, EILEEN!October 11th, 2009 - 4:39 am
Hi Eileen,
Thought you’d enjoy this, found on another site:
“(Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he’s just “PRES__ENT” Obama = Without “ID”)”
HAHAHAHAHAH!
:-D
Hey, EILEEN...October 11th, 2009 - 4:39 am
Hi Eileen,
Thought you’d enjoy this, found on another site:
“(Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he’s just “PRES__ENT” Obama = Without “ID”)”
HAHAHAHAHAH!
:-D
shane2813October 11th, 2009 - 7:13 am
So Obama is for men having sex with little kids. His Perverted Safe Schools Czar thinks so. Kevin Pervert Jennings think NAMBLA National Man Boy Love Association is just fine. The SICKOOOOOOOOOOOOOS have taken over the Democrat Party. More tapes soon. Just a little NUDGE. We have cameras everywhere. MARXIST=DEMOCRATS=TERRORIST All the same
SteveOctober 11th, 2009 - 7:45 am
Not fast enough? I wont ASK but I can TELL Obama is a moron.
BillOctober 11th, 2009 - 8:00 am
Does this policy shift include his Birth Certificate?
TomOctober 11th, 2009 - 8:09 am
Calvin&Hobbes October 11th, 2009 – 12:47 am
What does the author of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”, Bill Clinton, have to say about this?
Sounds like a slap in the face.
Bill Clinton is for repealing this
Also if it is so bad to have gay men in the military then why do they let them in now? Its called don’t ask don’t tell not don’t even think about it. There are currently gays and lesbians in the military and there always has been. They just can’t tell anyone which goes against the oath they take when they are sworn in. The government is forcing them to lie which is wrong. The military has kicked out people with the skills to help in our current conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq(translators)
This NEEDS to be repealed NOW and it WILL BE.
stacyOctober 11th, 2009 - 8:27 am
Let us call it the “Tell and go to hell” policy.
Doesn’t this seem a little silly. Obama ran on a platform of getting us out of an unpopular war. Not only are we still involved in an unpopular war but it is getting worse. If I were in the military would I want to fight under a president that deneied that we had accomplished anything by going into Iraq — other that pissing off the world for our — as they call it — arrogance?
You can be openly gay in the military . . . . and still get the lack of support from the most limp wristed president we have ever had.
This president is all talk and no teeth. This is an easy win for Obama in the gay community. But what is it really getting us?
carolynOctober 11th, 2009 - 8:51 am
obama has no morals.and he is not a christan.he out to take america down.the news media has been not telling the truth so long that i think there should be a money trail.after all it was the media that got him in office.they think we can not think for our selfs.he welcomes the muslims the ones who did 911.but he wont go to prayer day.oboma we are not alseep.and we can think for ourselfs.i know more people that see this so its not just me.the next election will show it.pray for america.
jp2feministOctober 11th, 2009 - 9:02 am
This was one of his most passionate speeches so far. . .but even so, I still don’t think he was being honest with his audience. There is just something about him that is so calculating. Who is this man?
SubjectoftheUSSAOctober 11th, 2009 - 9:25 am
You’d think he’d learn from Clinton, go ahead President Zero, do this. He just wants to cut recruitment
pepito cojonesOctober 11th, 2009 - 9:28 am
BIG DEAL!!! SO WHAT! WHO CARES! DOESN’T THE GAY COMMUNITY REALIZE THAT THIS GUY IS AN EMPTY SUIT, A LIAR. THE GAY COMMUNITY IS SO GULLIBLE.
DON’T HOLD YOUR BREATH, little obama WILL LET EVERYONE DOWN!!!
Mikeyh0October 11th, 2009 - 9:34 am
Three thousand gay, lesbian, trans-gendered(WTF), and just plain horny perverts show up and Obama’s literally kisses their a**es. But one MILLION or more concerned citizens respond and try to redress their grievances against the government and the fool leaves town. Now that’s just his way. He’s not EVER going to get it, is he? And promises? You’ve got to laugh. If anyone believes him anymore, well, go ahead. Gays? Okay you don’t like “don’t ask, don’t tell.” How about “Don’t touch, don’t die.” And that isn’t homophobia – I just don’t want some perv touching me. And I have a right to protect myself.
HooterOctober 11th, 2009 - 9:39 am
(a) It is a privilege not a right to serve in the US Armed Forces. (b) The US Armed Forces are for defending the United States, not for social experiments. (c) Obama hasn’t considered that not all ship designs of the fleet are able to support segregated sexes. Older frigates and submarines are a perfect example, just how and what are his intentions regarding under new policy. Also with long duration deployments at sea, does Obama intend to turn the ships into some sort of “Love Boat” “French Cruiser” fleet? What of the men and women who do not wish to serve and live in close quarters with homosexuals, what accommodations will be offered?
I can already see some gay guy making a pass or looking at a fellow sailor showing on one of these combat ships, and next thing holy hell breaking out…
GorioOctober 11th, 2009 - 12:01 pm
The Military Code of Conduct is a basic and general document that outlines with specificity the behavior the fighting man or woman must abide by. There is a fraternization portion that details indiscriminately the sexual behavior and the rules the military person must obey. If the gays can not abide by that Code of Conduct without making any changes to suit their lifestyles then they do not need to be there, period. As for their personalities and the manner in which they act in uniform that too must be held to account and punished when acting out of form. This is called discipline, without it, the military fails. Failure to accept discipline, means a failure to conform to the way of life that supports protecting and defending each other in circumstances of armed conflict against an oppressor or enemy. If you can not count on your fellow soldiers to have the same focus as you because they are entranced with their sexual preferences, they do not need to be there.
CqmmqnSenseOctober 11th, 2009 - 12:16 pm
It’s disgusting that he perpetuates the falsehood that the struggle of gays is even in the same ballpark as blacks. He is a two faced pandering politician who will cut the throats of anyone who holds him back from his own perceived popularity.
He will leave the gay people behind as well as all the others he leaves behind when they no longer can offer him a value – like a vote.
It always amazed me that gay people got behind this guy when he was very clear on being against gay marriage. Maybe it’s because of his honesty and transparency regarding Larry Sinclair and his evening in a limo with cocaine and crack.
This guy is so selfish and evil it’s mind boggling! And those of you who support him are insane.
Shirley ChisolmOctober 11th, 2009 - 1:13 pm
Why do the words ‘gay’ and ‘dinner’ have to appear next to each other?
That’s disgusting to see and totally uncalled for on any morning…
All homosectsyouls are SELFISH beings doing UNNATURAL ACTS!
Dear God, keep them AND Barack away from our children.
Evil’s NOT far behind- just look at past civilizations…
The product of their ‘union’ is sem.en and human feces.
And their immoral acts violate natural law AND GOD!
As a “Christian” he opposes gay marriage and is for civil unions.
OBarry will say anything to anyone to get a vote, what does he really believe.?
LarseOctober 11th, 2009 - 5:13 pm
I have another one of my fabulous predictions that have an odd habit of becoming very true!!!
If gays are allowing into the military, there will be as many military gays then, as there are right now…
We all just won’t be lying about it anymore…
KaseyOctober 11th, 2009 - 8:40 pm
Yeah he’ll end the don’t ask don’t tell perhaps the way he did for Donald Young although he thought Donald Young was just going to tell.
HarrisonOctober 11th, 2009 - 8:43 pm
Shirley Chisolm October 11th, 2009 – 1:13 pm
Why do the words ‘gay’ and ‘dinner’ have to appear next to each other?
———————————————————————-
It’s Obama’s word games he likes to play. Gay–Dinner Phuked up—beer summit See how it works?
COMPLAINTS (DEMANDS) FOR LEGISLATORS (PASS IT ON)October 11th, 2009 - 11:21 pm
Complaint List for Legislators – Email or telephone them with these concerns (and PASS IT ON!)
Points to make in your daily calls & emails to your legislators (ADD OTHER POINTS AS NEEDED):
1. We do not want any Cap & Trade! Americans cannot afford it and will not accept it.
2. We do not want your Health Care Reform. How do we opt out?
3. Get rid of that so-called “Safe Schools Czar” immediately!
4. Get rid of Mark Lloyd, the so-called “Diversity Czar” and stop threatening to shut down freedom of speech in America.
5. Don’t even try to legalize gay marriage in America, further destroying the morality in our country and further breaking our Social Security system.
5. Shut up about any so-called “Value Added Tax”!!! Don’t even go there.
6. NO AMNESTY (OR “RIGHTS”) FOR ILLEGAL ALIENS!!! SEND THEM HOME.
7. NO MORE $$$ FOR ACORN, & INVESTIGATE CHARLIE RANGEL!!
Are you people all insane??? Don’t you realize we are going to vote all of you out, if you don’t straighten out???
If a straight soldier doesn’t want to share a foxhole or close quarters
with an openly gay soldier, will he be forced to? If he still doesn’t,
will it result in some kind of sanction or reprimand? Will this cause
problems with troop cohesion? Will this result in gays being grouped away
from straights? Will brass or higher ups fight with their straight soldiers
over these matters, and if so, what will this do for unit cohesion? Does having
openly gay troops provoke the enemy? Will having openly gay soldiers result
in an avalanche of filings of misconduct and insubordination? Is repealing
don’t-ask don’t tell worth the mess is will probably cause? Mark Tulsa, OK
SeanOctober 12th, 2009 - 11:08 pm
What is the most disturbing is that the gay officiers won’t be held to any sort of standard while having power of young straight subordinates.
If Obama changes DADT, new recruitments will diminish and will hurt our military’s ability to do their job.
So when Obama said, “I believe marriage is between a man and a woman. I am not in favor of gay marriage.” we are to ignore this?
It is Koranic. Even though I believed that first, ignore it, because I believe the opposite now,