|
|||||||||||||||
![]() |
NBC’s Chuck Todd: Fox News Is Trying to ‘Undermine’ Serious Journalists |
![]() |
|||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||
![]() |
|
![]() |
|||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Panic time!
Panic time!
Panic time!
Panic time!
Panic time!
Chuck you are correct we are smart enough to figure it out, we figured out the news was being presented in a slanted way.
Ya, it’s you wanna-be reporters, who have your head sooooo far up Obama’s *ss, who are undermining the REAL journalists. You people need to go back to journalism school, I believe you’ve actually forgotten how the job is truly supposed to be done.
“a crazy accusation” rofl… haha… yea, it’s soooooo insane to think that the MSM is slanted to the left, that’s a real stretch isn’t it
OHHHHHHHHHH TODD…… Get your head out of your A$$… “We The People” don’t buy that crap anymore and you and your “Ilk” are going to get some “Big News” in the Fall of 2010 and 1012. I hope their will still be some money left in unemployment accounts when you Morons apply for benefits.
Wayne is exactly right!
We are smart enough to figure it out and thats why we are going to Fox, and places like the BIG sites are taking off.
That may be one of the few times you will every hear “they are smart” from MSLSD.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAAA are they serious???!!!! If they are, I am astounded at their blindness…You talk about a mental disorder….
And as a leap of faith, A LEAP OF FAITH SIR, F. Chuck Todd should walk out into traffic.
What a douche bag…
Serious Journalists! In the bag for Barry.
Wasn’t that you standing in front of the White House a couple of months ago, betting some other NBC dolt that you were going to shave that “beaver” on your chin if you lost the bet?
Hmmmm…
You’re a serious journalist?
Oh, I never knew that.
They’re doing this to garner ratings…wanna bet?
If we wish for America to continue, Obamunism must be fought every second of every day, in all its heinous manifestations.
Everone knows there are no real journalists left, maybe a few, but they sure don’t work for CBS or NBC or ABC or CNN
Well the people did decide
and the majority of people who watch that clip
will be from conservative news sites
cause they sure aren’t watching MSNBC.
Chuckie is a social climber trying to advance his career. He will wag for anyone who pats his head. He has been repulsive even in his first job, couldn’t even report correctly from the Hill. He looks for cracks that he can get into that will protect his attacks on Americans who do not want to fight Iran for Israel. He’s pretty obvious. Sorry kid, you just are too obvious and try to make others look bad.
Chuck, when the drive by media starts asking real questions and presenting facts in a more objective way, perhaps more people will take you seriously. We demand the facts- nothing more or nothing less. Now move along, you will be late for your t-ball game.
Geez Todd….Amazing that only media pundits and the elites and NBC have this figured out.
Neglect the thoughts of millions of viewers who think otherwise? I doubt it.
Jealous men look like idiots
Chuck Todd is and always has been a loser reporter who sucked up to Barry Steve Obama during the campaign and is too much of a whimp to ever ask Barry any serious questions. Go wash your hair!
“Serious journalists” have irrevocably undermined their own credibility, fox news nor any other group are responsible, nor can they help them. It will take time and real reporting as well as admission of guilt to rehabilitate the images of these people. ( I won’t hold my breath. )
Journalism? Mean this still exists at those defunct places NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN, MSNBC. These places DO NOT have REAL news. These now defunct company’s are the Provda of Socialist America not FREE AMERICA.
Who is Chuck Dodd? I see his mouth moving but can’t see the hand up his *$$ working the controls…
Hey Chuck! Your father was a shitty quarterback for the Jets, but at least he was a real man. You, on the other hand, are the definition of “Yellow Journalism.”
If I was on MSNBC, the only chill I would get up my leg is the one Savannah Guthrie would give me. Delicious.
Chuckie is just mad nobody pays any attention to him anymore. He really did himself in during his pop-in times on C-Span. He couldn’t even report then.
It’s refreshing to see that NBC admits it’s a terrorist channel of brain dead individuals—-THAT’S SERIOUS !
“There is certain news organizations out here whose agenda is to undermine the 90% of journalists who are just simply trying to cover stories out there” (the word is “are” when it is plural, you dumb a$$ Libtard) — Listen, I personally have had it with NBC. It is a waste of airtime and needs to be taken off the air. Also, look what Andrea Mitchell did yesterday regarding innocent bullet points written on someone’s hand! I mean, MY GOD! What Chuck Todd meant to say is “90% of journalists who are just trying to cover stories in a BIASED & PARTISAN way out there”. Keep crying in your microphone, Todd, you’ll probably be out of work soon and begging FOX NEWS to hire you.
There are very few serious journalist left in the MSM or “fringe media.” They are mostly propagandist without any honor or ability to look at things objectively. It is a sad day for America but most professions in America today are full of liars,cheats and thieves. America has become a country without morals or standards.
Keep crying in your microphone, Todd, you’ll probably be out of work soon and begging FOX NEWS to hire you.
hey, todd, try not offending the intelligence of those who dissagree with obama’s policies- try being unbiased- try it for a week and see if your rating trickle up…
Hey, Chuck! Your father was a lousy quarterback for the Jets, but at least he was a real man. You, on the other hand, are the definition of “yellow journalism.”
If I were on MSNBC, the only chill I would get up my leg is the one Savannah Guthrie would give me. Delicioous!
Yes, he is right, we can tell when somebody is trying to feed us a line!
That 90% he speaks of are the hide the ball to protect the party socialist/liberal/democrat hacks. So great I’m all for “unearthing” those miserable failures.
chuck’s credibility (and his ilk) is very low because the public has been so insulted by constant “junk journalism” offered by the msm that even if he really wants to be even handed he has trouble. nbc, msnbc, cbs, cnn, abc and numerous print media journalists have been so unfair in their news coverage that their viewership is down markedly-while fnc viewership is skyrocketing. the frustration due to this is starting to show. as breitbart stated “it’s not your business model that sucks…it’s YOU that sucks”.
Mmmm…Nope. It’s you. There’s nothing ’serious’ about a journalist that omits, lies, panders, attacks, ignores major stories, aggressively promotes a leftist agenda, takes orders directly from the Whitehouse, and actively attempts to smear all who disagree with you. You present no alternative perspectives – only Liberal, Left, or Liberal Moderate. You have contempt for everyday Americans and live in a bubble of elitist groupthink.
You’re ratings have been declining for some time, yet rather than than offering a more balanced menu, you stubbornly refuse to examine yourselves. You’re ratings are in the toilet – and it’s because you’re incapable of introspection; you’d rather place the blame elsewhere, like jealous ex-lovers or arrogant children. You deserve to fail.
Chuck U….Todd
If he truly believes this-then we can see just how blind this liberal sickness makes people.
It’s time to chuck Todd
Chuckie..you’re delusional..you think you’re a journalist??..actually, you’re a squirrel.
I believe here at the white house, i mean nbc….
Huntley and Brinkley would be aghast at how far NBC has declined.
Chuck Todd, Chief White House sychophant. Perhaps your biased MSNBC channel might garner some real journalistic credence if you were to properly investigate Barry Sotero’s collegiate background with the ferver you reserve for Sarah Palin attacks…..Hmm??
Who funded Barry’s tuition? Where are his college transcripts? Who paid for Barry’s trips overseas as a starving college student? What passport did he use to travel to Pakistan? What are Barry’s real links to George Soros, Tony Rezko, Rod and Patty Blagojevich? How did he sell his senate seat to the incompetent junior senator from Illinois?
There are so many more questions that need real answers; why hasn’t TORT reform been mentioned by Barry’s White House? I know, let’s blame Bush some more, let’s spin more lies about real investigative journalism ala Breitbart. Instead, please tell us more about ‘tingling legs’ or Barry’s ’swagga’. LOL, you dolts are going to pay in the upcoming midterms.
Hey chuck.
We just consider ourselves extremely lucky as viewers that msnbc didnt cut off your head in order to hide your skin color.
What an extremely well dignified and professional organization msnbc is.
Most MSM “journos” spin the news so much, that I think there should be a “push down and twist” label on their foreheads.
I guess it was Fox that blocked ole Chucky et al from covering the Edwards “love child” story.
What a joke, except for Tapper, I wouldn’t trust these d-bags to cover the White House Easter Egg Roll. (Assuming they still have an Easter Egg Roll…)
It’s funny, you could accuse these clowns’ wives and daughters of servicing both Super Bowl teams, and they wouldn’t take it as hard as a criticism of Obama’s policies.
I really do wonder if they feel a twinge of guilt as they got to church, pretending to pray; all the while knowing that the One True Christ, the Most Holy Lord and Savior, the Shining Light Of The Universe is in fact alive, in our presence; and His Name is Barack Hussein Obama.
Chuck is not the worst of the bunch, he’s been alright in the past, but bias is also seen in the things you choose not to report or investigate – and the MSM (including Todd) have dropped the ball when it comes to Obama.
Who the hell is Chuck Todd? Oh, I get it, an MSNBC troll. Nothing they do is credible. Does anyone watch this piece of crap network?
Todd’s level of self-awareness is laughable.
Hmmm what a tool…..”certain news organizations” out there….while we are just out there trying to report the news ~ no jack ass you think you get to decide ~ we all know that Rham-bo tells your vapid wasetland network what you are going to cover – nice try though…..deflect
Gotta agree with Ted White and others. These MSM monkeys are brainwashed into thinking that they are actually reporting unbiased and fair news coverage. That’s pure B.S.! Good to know that the REAL unbiased or at least mostly unbiased news media is finally getting to them though. MSM folks need to get out of the studio and talk to real people some times. They’d be surprised what they found out.
Okay Todd, you attack Sarah P with a vengeance, but then ask Barry Milhouse Obama what is his favorite color, etc…..
The MSM is dead, as far as I am concerned
The death spiral continues. It’s fun watching these leftist con-artist try to justify their failure. Hey you stupids in the old leftist media IT’S OVER!!!!!! YouBetcha…..LOL Poor little whinebags. MARXIST=DEMOCRATS=TERRORIST All the same. P.S. You leftist in the old dying media….SIT DOWN AND SHUT UP!!!! Thank you very much.
Chuck is just another liberal hack that can’t handle the truth. America “gets it”–the MSM still can’t get over the monoploly they lost beginning with the ascent of talk radio in the late 80’s. Hey Chuck —MAN UP and realize you have legitimate competition now –you need to report accurately, not just want you think the Beltway crowd wants to hear. But then, that won’t happen will it?
The sheer nerve of this jagoff is astounding.
The time has come to start beating the @hit out of these swine. See Chris Matthews at the Dry Cleaners, punch him in the face. See Scarborough, sucker-punch the little pr1ck. Kick Rachel Madcow in the balls.
If there’s anything leftists can’t stand it’s competition, opposition, or dissent. Any attempt whatsoever at opposition is immediately mocked, ridiculed, undermined, attacked, outlawed, and eliminated if possible. The socialist left is the enemy within our country – traitors one and all.
Specificity Chuck, specificity. Journalism 101.
Five points of a good story: Who, what, where, when, and how. Specificity.
Cable News Ratings for Friday, February 5, 2010
Live + Same Day Cable News Daily Ratings for February 5, 2010
P2+ Total Day
FNC – 1,449,000 viewers
CNN – 414,000 viewers
MSNBC –352,000 viewers
CNBC – 206,000 viewers
HLN –329,000 viewers
P2+ Prime Time
FNC – 2,618,000 viewers
CNN – 563,000 viewers
MSNBC –724,000 viewers
CNBC – a scratch w/106,000 viewers
HLN –511,000 viewers
Is there anything better than a whining Liberal in the morning?
How it must SUCK to be a stupid Liberal…..to stick your head up your own arse before reading the instructions on how to pull it back out!
This is just silly. But if you want the inside scoop straight, you can rely on me. As an example, here’s what happened inside the White House during the Super Bowl party:
http://www.goodboybo.com/2010/02/our-super-bowl-party.html
Bo
Try being a reporter and not a repeater and you might actually be worth watching one day. dnc.org is shorter to type than msnbc, to get the same quality of your ‘unbiased journalism.’
To quote a real News person,
“It’s not your business model that sucks, It’s YOU that suck.”
Where the frack were you back in 2008 ??
You and the rest of your turds were licking Obama’s butt, that’s where you were… The Lame Stream Media did the deed so now you will reap what you sowed. Without the MSM’s WILLING support for the leftist agenda Obama would be voting present as per usual in his old senate seat.
You and your fellow useful tools in the media are nothing more than agenda driven leftist yellow dog hacks,
Yo are NOT reporters. You are nothing more than propagandist tools.
go screw yourself….
Chuck Todd, mmm let me see isn’t that Robert Gibb’s Socialist puppet on one of the Obama News Agencies.
Note to true journalists: Your work shines through even in the so-called “lame-stream” media.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Disobedience to God, ALWAYS leads to Disaster. Choose Wisely! %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% http://www.radioliberty.com <CLICK LISTEN ONLINE for the UNvarnished TRUTH…
That’s all F Chuck Todd does is report what Obama tells him to report. He and the rest of MSNBC/CNN and others no longer challenge what the White House says.
For example, don’t you think the Premier of Newfoundland, Canada coming to the US for heart surgery would be worth an investigation into the effectiveness of Canada’s socialist healthcare environment?
His question was rhetorical, but–YES–we did figure it out. Namely that the vast, left-wing, socialist supporting media is in the tank for Obama and the dems. The only large news organization who is not is FOX. In poll after poll of FOX’s reporting, it is they who come out with the least media bias insofar as news reporting goes.
The public don’t like to be manipulated. The left news media, spins and distorts consistently. It’s not even the bias, which is easy to understand and dismiss, but the outright lies and spin are the order of the day at the MSNBCs of the airwaves. Even the once grand NY Times has killed stories thought to be unfavorable to Obama, but most certainly would have run the same story against his Opponents. What has happened to the news media–for the most part–is that they’ve become illegitimate. No one trusts them. That is the change I see on the news media’s “landscape”. Now news can be had in many other places, the web has ended their control. One of the most uplifting developments in news delivery to occur in years.
Just think of the serious stories the mainstream news has missed. Van Jones, a truther and avowed communist in the white house. They missed it–Beck didn’t. ACORN–they missed it, but a twenty something with a camcorder didn’t. Presently the vast, liberal news media glazes over any unfavorable dem news. Where are the reports on the corruption of Charlie Rangle? The sweetheart deals Boxer’s husband got? How does Barney Frank manage to become the equivalent of a media darling on the left, when–in fact–he was one of the chief architects of America’s economic collapse?
Complain–little boy with the mike–but we not watching in droves. You’ve become irrelevant.
Hey F Chuck Todd how come you network is covering the John Edwards sex story 2 years AFTER the National Enquirer?
what color hood do you like, Black ones(for those of u who like to be seen in the dark u know what i mean) or those of u who like White ones (those of u who like the day time) “Breithart” (this website), People like both colors.
He didn’t say faux news.So what made you right wingers think he was talking about faux noise?
Wow, for a second there I thought he was talking about himself and the network he was on.
90% of journalist just trying to cover stories!
It is the business of, lets just say it…Fox to undermine the MSM!
Please Chuck don’t try to peddle this trash. 90% of journalist are biased journalist trying to tow the liberal line. We know this. The other 10% are the unbiased journalists that now have half the market and soon to be more. Hmmm I wonder why that is? Because guys like you trying to sell the public this propaganda.
The public is running away from the MSM and YOU for a reason Chuck…bias reporting.
Report the stories straight.
Report what is important to the people not the liberal elite.
Report on the tea party without being mean and condescending. Not mentioning racism would be a plus.
Report on the facts of the economy, budget and deficit and stop trying to spin it as good news.
Do this and watch your credibility and rating skyrocket.
It’s pretty simple Chuck. Do you job!
He’s just trying to get a chance to wake up in the morning and roll over to see Barry/Obama like what what’s his name does!
Detective Chuck: Anything but the facts, ma’am.
Todd is taking Obama’s politics one step further…
Obama is attempting to attack Republicans credibility
This is Todd’s attempt to raise doubts about anyone other than the Biased media.
Its just one more attempt at the libertards politics of destruction..
HEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHE!!! LOVE IT!!!
You Lose..We Win…It’s OVER!!!
real journalist,let me see who can that be, hey how about james okeefe and hanna giles,who reported what u so called msm didnt report
At the President’s first news conference, I seem to remember Ed Shultz sitting on the first row. I guess that is what Chuck Todd sees as a “serious journalist”.
Are you kidding me? This coming from Chuck Todd? I believe he has BHO’s cell phone number programmed into his Blackberry. For this guy to comment on objective journalism is no doubt the most ludicrous and laughable thing I have heard yet in 2010.
When ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, and MSNBC covers the NEWS FAIRLY, then we’ll think…….
about them being “SERIOUS JOURNALISTS.”
MAYBE YOU’LL FIGURE OUT BEFORE YOU GO BANKRUPT THAT CARRYING THE OBAMA’S WATER…….
WON’T PAY YOUR BILLS.
I don’t care who you are that there is funny. Chuck U Todd!
Todd the NBC News Chief, are they for real? For something to be undermined, they first have to have one.
Why do we use the word “journalist” as if this were an individual free from influence of the story he/she is presenting. No human will ever be THAT.
Is FOX fair…I believe so. Is FOX balanced…I would argue that they aren’t. But that’s okay. I get to see a media-outlet with a conservative point of view allow people of other paradigms and perspectives come and express openly their opinion. NOW that is good rhetorical debate. For instance when Sean Hannity had Michael Moore on his program I believe Michael had the stronger presentation even though I was not persuaded to admit he was correct. Sean should have done a better job in his preparation.
This is what the platform of public debate is supposed to do for us the public. For example, during the famous Lincoln-Douglas debates newspapers edited the speeches (from transcripts) of the candidate they supported and left the speech of the other candidate in its rough form…giving the reader the impression that the supported candidate was the more qualified.
Conclusion: News reporters (news presenters) are never free from their own personal bias. But, alas, I am preaching to the choir.
hey chuck wad, where might me find these alleged journalists.
Chuckie….you and the rest of the ultra liberal loons, who pretend to be journalists, will say ANYTHING to try and discredit Fox because their ratings are killing you and the rest of your kind! The more you bad mouth Fox the lower your ratings will drop….keep up the good work!!!
MSNBC? Serious journalist? That’s a laugh. Serious assassins is more accurate. They shoot at Palin every night-and MISS!
And somebody needs to tell Tamron “I think I’m the new Diana Ross” Hall, she needs a serious wardrobe fix. If you wanna dress like a hooker when you’re off the air, that’s fine. But PLEASE quitting wearing the strumpet threads and tattoo hose on the air.
This is another reason why more people watch Fox. No skanks.
************************* Turn your t.v. off and take your country back! http://www.trunews.com <CLICK THE 'MICROPHONE'
WWWWWHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Todd…Grow some stones and start getting objective.
MSNBC. The place for reporters who suck.
DEAR CHUCK, Where were the ’serious journalists’ during the campaign when you ’serious journalists’ kept all information about barry covert? http://www.republicbroadcasting.org <CLICK LISTEN LIVE
that crap on his face does not match his character or his personalty he should wear a bow tie and su_k on a lolly pop
Huh?
I’d trust Bill Sammon long before I’d ever trust ANYONE at MSNBC/NBC or any of the other networks.
And Chuck, check the friggin ratings, dude.
YOU right-wing extremists need a media outlet for your propaganda. That is Ailes/Fox News.
Fox News would be more open if it declared itself to be the evangelical channel for the establishment of a theocratic government.
Democracy does not exist on Fox News Channel…it is not “fair” it is not “balanced” because there are no liberal talk show hosts, and it is “unafraid” to attack anything opposing Ailes’ political agenda.
READ THIS………..
Fox news should declare itself to the the right-wing extremist evangelical political propaganda outlet for the estalishment of a theocratic dictatorship. That is Ailes’ agenda.
Chuck,
I am an independent voter and an educated small business owner. I flip channels in the morning for the news. Your new show is by far the weakest. Morning Joe is a close second. Fox is the best reporting, Robin Meade is worth watching on a rainy day because she is cute and happy. The truth is have Morning Joe interview you is about as exiting as a cable access show on knitting. I mean, I am sure someone interested, somewhere, just not anybody I know or talk to. NBC news is pointless without Russert. One last thing, loose the cheesy beard, that may help.
HATE…..HATE…..HATE….HATE
ALL THAT ENERGY YOU EXPEND ON HATRED AND BIGOTRY!
IGNORANCE IS A DISEASE, AND YOU PEOPLE OF THE RIGHT FIGHT AGAINST ANY CURE.
STUPIDITY IS NOT A BIRTH DEFECT…..YOU WORK AT IT.
ha ha February 9th, 2010 – 10:16 am He didn’t say faux news.So what made you right wingers think he was talking about faux noise?
TITLE SAYS— NBC’s Chuck Todd: Fox News Is Trying to ‘Undermine’ Serious Journalists
THEY ALSO SHOWED A CLIP OF FOX NEWS BEFROE HE STARTED TO MAKE A FOOL OF HIMSELF.
HE TALKED ABOUT THE FOX NEWS VP……… HA HA what makes you think you have a brain???
The U.S. adult population is projected to be 300M+ [308,586,000 per US Census]. The predominate majority [95%+] of U.S. “news organizations” operate as [1] a for-profit business [2] a division of a non-U.S. foreign owned/controlled parent corporation or owners [3] a business unit that is essentially a part to a U.S. media conglomerate. They are, simply put, essentially, nothing more than for-profit business machines, in need of continuous revenue generators. As such, these media/news organizations are driven by and vulnerable to continuously evolving mass market metrics. The use of “ratings” and “polls” as metrics have been tactical tools specifically used to compete for advertisers [the primary source of revenues]. Why such ratings are being bandied about as a measurement of comparison for business success is nothing short of mind boggling. An accurate measure of success for any for-profit US media/news group involves absorption to market share. When the U.S. media/news as a whole consistently accomplish a consistent audience of greater than 20% [of the adult population], then it might be reasonable for them to claim they have attained “ratings success”. Professional business analysts have identified a significant and increasing challenge for them: downward trend of absorption stemming from lack of trust or belief. The market [U.S. adult population] as a whole does not believe or trust the U.S. media/news, and while this metric has grown over a relatively long span of time, this metric has escalated significantly in the most recent two years, far in advance of the expected/traditional bell curve cycles. The tipping point: the obvious withholding of so much information relating to, involving, and surrounding Obama; particularly basic things about his background. The largest demographic in the adult population [as it relates to electoral voting patterns] are now the independents; by nature, these independents think for themselves, many are involved in small business or have a person close to them that makes a living in small business. They are suspicious of “big-anything”, so the crap that has been peddled by both the left and the right in “big-media/news” and “big-government” is not remotely believable to them. Its insulting, so they turn it off and turn away. Presto…there you have it…no trust…no audience…no paying customers [advertisers]…and the Chuck Todd’s are left to “play journalist”, along with all those like him, in the little sand box they have built for themselves.
FR if ignorance is a disease, you should probably go ahead and take the blue pill.
The U.S. adult population is projected to be 300M+ [308,586,000 per US Census]. The predominate majority [95%+] of U.S. “news organizations” operate as [1] a for-profit business [2] a division of a non-U.S. foreign owned/controlled parent corporation or owners [3] a business unit that is essentially a part to a U.S. media conglomerate. They are, simply put, essentially, nothing more than for-profit business machines, in need of continuous revenue generators. As such, these media/news organizations are driven by and vulnerable to continuously evolving mass market metrics. The use of “ratings” and “polls” as metrics have been tactical tools specifically used to compete for advertisers [the primary source of revenues]. Why such ratings are being bandied about as a measurement of comparison for business success is nothing short of mind boggling. An accurate measure of success for any for-profit US media/news group involves absorption to market share. When the U.S. media/news as a whole consistently accomplish a consistent audience of greater than 20% [of the adult population], then it might be reasonable for them to claim they have attained “ratings success”. Professional business analysts have identified a significant and increasing challenge for them: downward trend of absorption stemming from lack of trust or belief. The market [U.S. adult population] as a whole does not believe or trust the U.S. media/news, and while this metric has grown over a relatively long span of time, this metric has escalated significantly in the most recent two years, far in advance of the expected/traditional bell curve cycles. The tipping point: the obvious withholding of so much information relating to, involving, and surrounding Obama; particularly basic things about his background. The largest demographic in the adult population [as it relates to electoral voting patterns] are now the independents; by nature, these independents think for themselves, many are involved in small business or have a person close to them that makes a living in small business. They are suspicious of “big-anything”, so the idiocy that has been peddled by both the left and the right in “big-media/news” and “big-government” is not remotely believable to them. Its insulting, so they turn it off and turn away. Presto…there you have it…no trust…no audience…no paying customers [advertisers]…and the Chuck Todd’s are left to “play journalist”, along with all those like him, in the little sand box they have built for themselves.
Keep whinin’, upChuck,….soon you might be asked to be a guest on keith odorman, or maybe ed shoolz, or even ralph madcow……you are about the same calibre and would add to the comedy that is msnbc primetime…..
Oh, Chucky, Chucky, Chucky… You and the other two liberals on this comment board are full up to your hair follicles. It’s pretty hilarious when a Chuck Toad lectures the nation. His network along with CBS and ABC are swirling down the toilet, not because they tell the truth, but because they’ve, without hesitation, revealed themselves to be shills for the liberal, progressive, Marxist, Obama candidacy, election and governing. It takes no effort at all to realize that the CHANGE Obama wants for America isn’t what Americans want for America and you, Chuck, are a cheerleader for Obama and his Change. So, anyone who has a different opinion is somehow insincere and only trying to make money. I’ve sworn off swearing, so let me just say, blow it out your nose.
Post a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
hmmmm…..I wonder what kind of journalist this guy is.