|
|||||
 |
MSNBC Panel: Romney’s Cash Gift ‘Plays Into… Patronizing Stereotype Of Black People’ |
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
Didn't matter if Romney gave her $50 or $50k or even a new home, the libpukes would have been cursing from the top of their racists lungs!
You want to know what greed does to people?… Look at what retaining control of $4 trillion dollars has turned the Democratic party into… Before long, your unborn children are going to be racist for thinking about it…
It seems they'd be over that whole patronizing thing years ago – it's the democrats cornerstone.
I guess to them it's more honorable to take money that is forced from a person by penalty of law, than to take money from a person who volunteers it freely. And God forbid the person who offers it freely is white!
MSNBC would rip a Republican for curing cancer, solving the national debt and all neo-natal birth defects.
That crap network should be shuttered.
Romney is great
I wonder what leftist advertising firm encounter grouped this one? Is it any different than Obama having a campaign worker find a home for a black woman in his audience that needed help?
Although this might violate campaign laws if he gave the money to her directy or had someone do it
This might have been a set up to get him to commit a campaign violation
It really does show who the lowlifes are. A person gives, what seems to be, an honest charitable contribution and people like these on MSNBC are drooling all over each other to decry it as racism or something else. At least he's giving his own money of his own free will. Maybe it was publicity, maybe not, I'll give the guy the benefit of the doubt. I still don't think he's the ideal candidate for president but I do respect these little, human acts.
Go away – you add nothing. Deceit is an ugly practice.
Sorry but can't you just say thank you and let your biases move over on this one. Explain to me why an act of charity is wrong, but yet you want to elect leaders and have them force other's who don;t necessariy want to help pay thru taxes. Charity is charity, stealing is stealing no matter how you parse it—at gunpoint or thru legislation.
It's also disingenuous for him to change his comment after posting like he just did. ShawnSen's original comment claimed Romney broke campaign finance laws and that he was trying to "buy votes". I think it's even more deceitful to not even have the guts to stand by your original comment, just change it to make someone like Grace656 look like a heel.
Nice.
That's what I was referring to. He also likes to use obscenities if you look at his reply to me.
What a delusional troll, what's next call me a "neocon" or curse at me like a childish punk who got caught abusing the cat? Grow up: your man Paul isn't going to win, he's not going to legalize pot, and you're still going to be living in your parents basement leeching off them.
uh-waaah uh-waah u-waaah
I've found it is best to report this child when necessary, and the rest of your time just ignore him. You are right though, he adds nothing to a conversation.
As a follow-up to this criticism, Mitt Romney issued a formal apology for being a wealthy white man.
He's a prepubescent little troll who likes to try and talk big on the internetz so his mommy can't see his language and wash out his potty mouth. Just ignore him, he's worthless….probably about the most worthless person I've ever seen because he can't debate, can't back up his claims, and can't even stand by his original arguments.
Oh trying to scare me you little twit. I'm freaking shaking your useless little twat. But at least get your information correct: I never have been and never will be a Romney supporter.
From what I have seen of this kid, he claims to be a Newt supporter, really hates Mormons, and does not seem to be a Paulbot. You are right though, he is a childish punk who has at least 2 screen names.
Of course to the MSNBC crowd only the government can give charity to people by taking someones money and then they decide if you have been a good little surf to deserve it
So, I suppose if Romney had just ignored her he would have been portrayed as a cold-hearted scrooge? This is one of those danbed if you do damned if you don't deals. How these mindless libs can turn an act of charity into racism is absolutely ridiculous, and it demonstrates that there is nothing in their skulls save for emotionalism and empty space.
.
YOU are the troll, I am not a Ron Paul supporter and you and the other moron are the attackers
Now get off my post , leave me alone
What is this world coming to?… was a time when 50 bucks bought an entire Black Family.
With a Mormon still in the Race as a Republican the Republican Party had better get used to the Attacks from the Left for being Racists.
Man you cant leave simple comment here without the freaks attackiing
Have the guts to stand by your original comments you pedantic thumb-sucking wimp
Guess eveyone thinks it wasnt' set up , just a campaign violation
Maybe because your post was meant to draw people in.
You are no Romney supporter. Neither am I.
uh-waah uh-waah uh-waah
WAIT A COTTON PICKING SECOND!
If our Government gives her a check, given to her with tax money taken from rich people, that's good. Yet when one man gives one person a gift of his own money of his own free will and volition, that's bad? Am I reading this right?
YOU and the Grace656 are the offensive attackers , not me
abuse a cat? pot? ron paul?
go away?
Ugly?
deceitful?
You two need to chill out
PROJECTION
THE TENETS OF AMERICAN EXCEPTIONALISM – AMERICANISM
(1) Individual Freedoms . . . The inalienable rights of mankind that allows him to think, discover, associate, produce, create, and express that result in having a Nation where the sum total of the greatness of individuals is greater than that of a minority of elitist rulers.
(2) Limited Constitutional Federal Government . . . The recognition that a powerful, centralized, over-reaching, government would be in opposition to individual freedoms, expressions, and creativity.
(3) The Free Enterprise – Capitalist Economic System . . . The recognition that supply and demand, along with competition tempered by limited regulation, results in greater prosperity and productivity and a higher standard of living, life, liberty, and happiness.
(4) The Rights of the Individual States . . . The division of America into States allows for an element of competition even in the realm of government which results in a better, more responsive, more creative government of, by, and for the American People.
(5) A Judeo-Christian Foundation . . . Inalienable Rights, the bedrock of Americanism, must be endowed by a Creator greater than man in order for man to be prohibited from denying these rights. The Faith of our Forefathers was that of Judeo-Christianity which works hand in hand with Individual Freedoms in that Christianity must be freely accepted by the individual in order to be valid.
(6) National Sovereignty . . . A land area without borders is no nation at all. Americans have the right to determine who is permitted to enter our Nation and become a citizen. Americans have the right to exclude those who seek to change our system of government, our culture, our foundation, from outside our Nation.
(7) The Inalienable Right to Self-Defense . . . American Exceptionalism will only be able to stand by recognizing the possibility of the existence of Enemies, both Foreign and Domestic, who might seek to destroy that which is The United States of America, and being willing to defend our Liberty, our Posterity, to the point of death, as previous generations have been compelled to do.
The Democrat Race Lie http://www.black-and-right.com/the-democrat-race-...
I have another comment, THat one was chnged —-made bigger ,
This is another comment , moron
Go look
"Romney is great "
You say the same thing about homosexual sex where you are on the bottom.
The US government would not be able to assist one e f f i n person if it did not first take money from hard working US citizens in the form of taxes. If it did not do that, then they would not have been able to WASTE HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS of dollars on programs which have not really helped at all. HUNDREDS of BILLIONS of dollars wasted and no one being held accountable . No one.
Broke Insane Obama has certainly brought US together, just like they said he would.
You can feel the love.
Is there any Romney supporters here? No one will admit to being one
And what would she have thought if Mitt Romney had refused?? NO GOOD DEED GOES UNPUNISHED!
Do you even read my comments or just make up stuff as you go along? Here is a tip. If you read from left to right, the words make a sentence.
I have never been a Romney supporter. Believe what you want. You can look through my comments and see for yourself.
No, because the majority of the people here are conservatives, including myself.
Old people shoud never have been allowed to use the internet
Was that auntie zutume. You know Obama's auntie who entered the USA illegally and received preferential treatment from US Customs and Immigration because she was Hussein Obama's aunt ?
Romney broke election laws by buying votes
This is America , not Libya
Be careful. Any and all references to cotton picking may be considered racist.
Not just the host !
The whole panel could chip in and help this lady out.
Panel: (crickets)…..
Airheads on a show nobody watches, except in small bits, here.
Old people (your parents) probably pay for your internet bill you ingrate
Name calling? You should out of grade school before they let you on line. I saw your other comment, I also saw this comment before you changed it. You aren't clever, you're just a pathetic little child that got caught in a lie.
You're a moron.
What a perfect example of self loathing Leftisit elites projecting their racial insecurities onto a GOP candidate. The fact that a poor, semi-literate African American woman is seen in public without a protective cordon of Democrats is what they find galling. She reinforces THEIR stereotypes of what under educated southern blacks are all about, and they want her to go away. They're afraid mean ol' whitey is going to see this woman and think all black folks are like her. It's interesting to note that the metrosexual male at the left of the panel literally laughs out loud at the woman in the video and no one sees that as a problem. Its liberals who sneer at people like her. To spin this as Romney's problem sets a new high in delusion on MSNBC. Unfortunately, now that the bar has been raised, a new record will probably be set tomorrow.
Obama money, GOOOOD!!! Romney money, BAAAAAD !!!!!
http://search.yahoo.com/r/_ylt=A0oG7nPbxRRPPlwA.U...
Let me explain to this MS -Numb Nut panel, especially the black women on the panel. IT IS NOT THE GOVERNMENT'S JOB to take care of ANYONE. No entitlement programs, no food stamps, no subsidized housing, no EBT cards.
What our pathetic government should be doing is creating an environment where businesses thrive and flourish. Then people who are willing to work can take care of themselves.
Charity should be in the local communities and churches NOT THE GOVERNMENT.
New from Tyler Perry: "Angry Black Women, Sittin' Around Hatin'".
It's ALWAYS patronizing when a "Crackah" Does something for blacks..I guess that's what I was doing when I gave my neighbors a ride home from the bus stop too. Freakin' loons, they hate it when races get along, they absolutely HATE it.
Aww why does my comment need to be approved first?
Must have been the "crackah" comment. 
Nope that wasn't it, maybe the "black" comment?
Imagine suggesting that black people would accept cash from a white guy.The very idea
Nope, that wasn't it, I give up.
To have a wealthy black man (Barry O the sugar daddy) give handouts to poor white people makes me cringe.
See how MSLSD's eyeglazing "tripe" can be turned back on them?. See you at the polls, losers.
At least it was his own.,,Not Mine like the numbnuts in the white house likes to do.,,,,,,
Liberals would rather use your money to help Miss Ruth Williams not theirs, and they would have given her only ten of your dollars and kept the forty back for taxes. You should be ashamed of yourself LIBERALS!
The woman was saying that Romney didn't do it out of pure goodwill, but because he is campaigning and trying to allude back to that archetype of the charitable conservative. I mean, there's no definitive proof what his motive was, but I'd wager it was ulterior. also, nothing wrong with welfare – some people need it and there's no better judge of a nation than by how they take care of their poor
So you want a return to unfettered capitalism like in the days of the robber barons and trusts that control the markets and set the price of commodities? A return to the sort of conditions documented in Upton Sinclair's "The Jungle"? When the common laborer worked a 12 hour day, 6 days a week and maybe another 1/2 day on Sunday. To child labor? Is that what you really want?
Capitalism is the best economic system that has been devised, but unfettered capitalism as espoused by Ayn Rand will lead to abuse of the majority of the people by the few who have the necessary resources and capital to do so. In the end unregulated capitalism will eventually lead to a revolt by the majority and the implementation of either communism or fascism in some form. History has show this to be true time and time again. I don't want that and neither do you.
Don't ever forget that Ayn Rand wrote fiction
Great so not to be seen as racists let's stop food stamps, welfare, HUD and giving unemployment to africans and mexicans who have never worked a day in their lives and only those who say they are nothing more then American
get our tax dollars.
To answer your question (that really wasn't a question it was a lead in to a lecture) yes! Everytime our government gets involved (or as you say fetters) they screw up the free market system. They always do this with the excuse that they are looking out for the people. How about if people looked out for themselves. You know, that "Personal Responsibility" thing. Of course, I'm sure you will want to pull out some example of why this is a bad idea. That is a favorite tactic for people who want to attack something. You know, like Obama talking about Doctors cutting off people's feet and needlessly taking out tonsils.
You don't need to remind be about what Ayn Rand wrote. I'm sure I know it a lot better than you.
You got that right, World. Barry O. is certainly the transparent unifier he said he would be…………………….. I do have that right, don't I????
Of for God sake, MSLSD, get a life why don't you. Are we so sick of hearing the race card BS. More so after Obama got in there. Give him the boot in 2012.
WHAT A BUNCH OF SICK TOADS.IF OBAMA GAVE THIS WOMAN MONEY THEY WOULD HAVE SAID HOW GREAT IT IS.M.S.N.B.C.TAKES THEIR ORDERS FROM OBAMA AND THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY.
I thought purchasing votes was a Democratic party play.
Little problem. I DON'T CARE!
I judge people by the content of their character, not the color of their skin (or the words they use).
If they don't like it, they can kiss my shinny butt!
More Orwellian BS from sick, twisted LIBerals. It's "racist" for Mitt Romney, or any rich white guy, for that matter, to GIVE money to help a poor, black person.
Yes, and the sky is red. Up is down. Good is bad. Oral sex is not sex. $5 trillion in debt in 8 years under Bush was bad. But $6 trillion in debt in 3 years under Obama is good. The LIB world view. 180 degrees out of focus from reality.
LIBerals do NOT get the United States of America. They really don't. Oh, they lap up ALL the spoils with the best of them. In fact, LIBerals are the quintessential "spoiled Americans", sporting their foreign vehicles and hot rods, their mansions and suburban fortresses, their fancy clothes and jewelry…their uppity digs in the penthouses of New York, Chicago, SF, Miami, etc… Yet they insist that the American way "doesn't work", as Nobama said recently. So they want to "transform" the country from one that "worked" quite well for them, thank you, into a Euro-socialist model of hardship, poverty and personal oppression, with only the elites faring particularly well.
No, the best way to judge a nation is by the opportunities it offers to its poor to better themselves and their situation. In other words, ways to no longer be poor. In that department, the US under the so called leadership of progressives, like Obama, fails. Besides, 'poor' is a relative term. 'Poor' people in this country own a car and more than one TV. Making people dependent on, and therefore a slave to, government is not charitable nor noble.
It just shows you how stupid the black women on the panel are,
You support a racist, Marxist pig in the white house who could care less about you or any of the other foolish sheep on the left. Yet, your not even smart enough to realize who started the KKK. Stupid is a s stupid does!
… and if Romney hadn't helped her the story would have been "He's cold; heartless; this is how he'll treat those in need if he is elected…".
Shut the freak up. What would you have said if he wouldn't have given them money to help? You can't please people like you.
"there's no better judge of a nation than by how they take care of their poor"
typical feel good statement. Now put a bit of meat on it.
When you say nation, do you mean the citizens or the government?
Not a peep when The One trotted out those persecuted examples of …. now they are Stereotypes?
Irony goes right over the heads of the News(?) Dept at MuchSophismNoBrainsCompany
It did no such thing. A close approximation of Laissez Faire Capitalism brought about the Industrial Revolution and the single greatest improvement in the lot of Man, and woman and child, this earth has ever seen. At no other time in history did more people have greater access to wealth and the ability to aggregate wealth for themselves and their ancestors than during the era you decry.
Ayn Rand wrote more non-fiction than fiction you insipid twit.
You can hold any opinion you desire. But rewriting history to fit a false narrative is intolerable.
What are you? A Luddite? Or a common run of the mill Marxist?
Jeeeez! What would they be saying if he had given her nothing? Or, worse, offered her $10,000! Would they have called that patronizing? There is no winning if you are a conservative!
What really galls me is, they don't have the slightest appreciation for the fact that "government" is giving away OTHER PEOPLE'S MONEY! Individuals, charities and churches are giving away money that was donated voluntarily with charity in mind. Imagine if Romney had suggested she go to the local church food pantry! LOL! We would hear the screaming inside our homes, with no computer or TV!
Did you actually read what I wrote? I clearly stated that capitalism is the best economic system that has ever been devised, that is hardly something that a Marxist would say. And I stand by my other comments as well, unregulated/unfettered capitalism will lead to great abuses of the average working person by those who have the means to do so; this is not an opinion but a historical fact. You'llendup with sweatshops, child labor, unsafe working conditions and all the other abuses that occurred during the time frame that you mentioned and to ignore these while extolling the gains made during this period is totally ignoring what happened. Government regulations came about because of thepopulous's outcry against the abuses of the era. Why exactly do you think laws were enacted such as the Pure Food and Drug act, the Sherman and Clayton Anti-trust acts and all the other regulations that were enacted?I didn't say that Ayn Rand wrote fiction exclusively, did I? What she is remembered for, “Atlas Shrugged”, “The Fountainhead” were fictional. And I find it to be totally ironic that someone who did not believe that the government should offer anything in the way of financial aid to those in need ended up taking assistance from the government when she was dying of cancer (done under an assumed name, of course). If she really believed what she wrote then she should have died penniless in the gutter, a fate that she would bestowed on others in the same situation she found herself in given the choice.Finally, was it really necessary to resort to name calling? Can anyone here make their point without resorting to playground level shenanigans?From: notifications@intensedebatemail.comTo: m_a_greg@hotmail.comSubject: MaskedPhrogg replied to your comment on MSNBC Panel: Romney's Cash Gift 'Plays Into… Patronizing Stereotype Of Black People'
That's the problem with with the media, MSNBC, and all progressives alike: Negativity. Nihilism. Divisiveness. Haughtiness. Cynicism. All under the guise of knowing what is best for us and dismissing any positive gestures that signify decent and humble acts. "They're must be some ulterior motive for that conservative doing something honorable and good! Helping out a poor black women when she's in need! Doesn't he see the inherent oppression of that?" You know, I finally figured out why Air America went belly up. Over a period of time, the audience kept committing suicide. This listeners eventually just dried up…
Ayn Rand wrote fiction…but then, so did Upton Sinclair. So what? No one is suggesting that we institute "unfettered capitalism." What we're suggesting is that we re-institute capitalism…not the crony capitalism practiced by Obama and those on the left. Rather we re-institute the sort of capitalism that allows everyone to succeed according to one's OWN abilities, talent, ambition and desires AND allows those without any of those things to fail if they prefer.
The Communists in this country have a hard time accepting the fact that there are charitable people out there.
That is why the attack religion. if charities or people give money the recipient is not beholden to the government and the party. This proves that the democrats or I should say communists are really the racists, they want dependant ignorant people to keep voting them into power, this is the cycle they have brought to minorities keep them stupid and dependant by taking from freedom loving working people to give to a dumbed down ignorant voting block. the reason they are dumbed down and ignorant is because of the likes of OBAMA, JESSIE JACKSON, AL SHARPTON, and all the others who want power over others and will keep that power by using race as a tool to devide rather than using individual freedom and responsibility as a tool to give these poor people self respect and a feeling of accomplishment. i know there will always be people in need but a helping hand is what is needed to a dependant way of life.
J P Morgan, Cornelius Vanderbilt, John D Rockefeller and the lot were the original “crony capitalists” who practices led to the reforms of the late 19th and early 20th century and I don't think you would characterize them as leftists, would you?Ayn Rand preached unfettered capitalism, this was her mantra (along with atheism). Objectivism (Rand's philosophy) can be summed up as thepursuitof one's own happiness is the only moral purpose in life, which sounds an awful lot like a quote from Alieister Crowley “Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law”. To me, that is the philosophy of pure evil.From: notifications@intensedebatemail.comTo: m_a_greg@hotmail.comSubject: Pappadave replied to your comment on MSNBC Panel: Romney's Cash Gift 'Plays Into… Patronizing Stereotype Of Black People'
The people who view the world through the prism of race are the ones who in fact are the racists.
Thank you for reminding us what mental illness leftism really is. There's "nothing wrong" idea of using government force to take from one group of people to give to another in exchnage for votes. But giving to other of your own free will is bad because the giver might have an "ulterior motive". People like you shouldn't be allowed outside padded walls, seriously.
Another textbook example of why the left's platform of social programs has never been about helping people
Typical White Non-Leftist; Slandered if we don't help the poor – especially if they're Black – slandered if We do!
How much did Romney give to anyone before he began running for office? There is no history of his "random kindeness". There is plenty of history of his political pandering. Kiss the babies. Act like a hunter. Sing God Bless America… What a phoney.
"Pure evil," Gracie? Good Lord, man! How on God's Green Earth can self-interest be "evil?" It's how every, single, human soul is CREATED! We are born intensely self-interested. It's an important human survival trait. We teach our children to overcome that instinct and to share and cooperate because that, too, is a means of survival because helping YOU to survive will help keep ME alive, too. Oops! Back to self-interest again.
Right. It was Democrats that started the KKK, populated it and do so to THIS day. It was a Democrat President who first segregated the military services (Wilson), instituted Jim Crow laws, made the infamous "Plessy v. Fergusson" decision instituting "separate, but equal" which was finally repealed by "Brown v. Board of Education" with the assistance of a REPUBLICAN President (Eisenhower). It was Democrats who filibustered the Civil Rights Act of '64 AND the Voting Rights Act of '65, neither of which would have passed Congress without the votes of a majority of Republicans. MLK, Jr was a lifelong, registered Republican as was Hattie McDaniels, the first black person to win an Oscar — and for many years the ONLY black to do so.
> Did you actually read what I wrote?Yes, you were quite clear.>I clearly stated that capitalism is the best > economic system that has ever been devised, that is hardly something > that a Marxist would say.It's exactly what a Marxist says when they are trying to mislead an audience into believing that Capitalism leads to abuses that Marxism will save them from.> unregulated/unfettered capitalism will lead to great abuses of the> average working person by those who have the means to do so; this is> not an opinion but a historical fact.It is your opinion and denies volumes of history.> You'llendup with sweatshops, child labor, unsafe working conditions> and all the other abuses that occurred during the time frame that you> mentioned and to ignore these while extolling the gains > made during this period is totally ignoring what happened.You're the one ignoring history as well as current conditions around the globe. Let us look at where sweatshops with unsafe working conditions are located. Under what style of governing regime is child labor an acceptable practice. It is always under collectivist governments that these abuses spring forth in reality. In the nation's that embrace capitalism and it's tenets such abuses cannot happen w/o the coercive hand of government bringing them about or enforcing their existence. It is only under regimes modeled after Marxist principles that such a abuses as you note are brought to fruition.Free markets on the other hand reward innovation and efficiency. So either you feel distaste for modern technology branding you a Luddite or you wish to see Marxism embraced in the Americas so that everyone sees an equal outcome irregardless of the fact that to bring this equality of outcome to all we must embrace a “share the wealth” ideology and bring everyone down to the lowest common denominator.
I'm sorry to disagree but the idea of focusing solely on your self interest and nothing else, which is what Rand and Crowley espoused is the characteristic of evil or of a sociopath. Cooperation and placing the needs of the many ahead (at times) of your own self interest is what allowed humanity to progress from grunting neanderthals to civilization. Yes, you do have to look out for #1 when it's appropriate but you also are your brother's keeper.From: notifications@intensedebatemail.comTo: m_a_greg@hotmail.comSubject: Pappadave replied to your comment on MSNBC Panel: Romney's Cash Gift 'Plays Into… Patronizing Stereotype Of Black People'
With the disaster that Obama is, cries of Racism is about all they've got.
Sorry, but you're WRONG. Enlightened self-interest is what's responsible for ALL of the technological and industrial progress that's been made by humanity. Do you think Steve Jobs did what he did out of some sense of altruism? He did it to make HIS fortune. That he also made many others very wealthy in the process is just a function of capitalism and was NOT his purpose. Businesses are started so that the owner can prosper. They are NOT started to "provide jobs" to other people, even though, as they grow, that's an inevitable result because productive volume requires workers.
Wait… according to the libs, this homeless black woman is now a mascot for Romney's campaign, yet I only heard about it in the first place from MSNBC complaining about it.
Citations required. And it's a lie. http://bigjournalism.com/rfutrell/2012/01/17/medi... so get your honkey a$$ over there and spout some more caca.
Post a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Follow Us on Twitter
Uncomfortable? Why? Because it goes against your narrative about those meeeean conservatives? Get off your stupid stereotypes. And yeah, your neighbor and your church IS supposed to help you, not a faceless government bureaucracy.