Texan if I remember correctly Carter ran on a platform of change in DC similar to how Obama is herding in the sheep now using the same empty promises of” Change”. History is repeating itself but with a much more dangerous candidate this time.

1) You can break off all forms of diplomacy and focus solely on killing them.

2) You can talk to them and try to make some progress towards peace.

Jimmy Carter believes option 2 is a better option. That may make him wrong in many people’s minds but neither option is really all that great.

The consensus by most in the United States is that violence is a better way to go.

That’s how we got the country in the first place and kept it and enlarged it We fought off the Indians, we fought off the British, we fought off the Spanish and the Mexicans. We whupped the Catholic immigrants in 1844 when they got too uppity and the Irish immigrants when they acted up a few years later. Not to mention the Chinese workers and the African Americans — slaves and ex-slaves alike. We kept them in their place for the welfare of the entire country, although it was hard on those particular folks. Just collateral damage.

We whupped ‘em in the Phillipines in 1898 and got the Phillipines, Puerto Rico and Guam. Then in the 20th Century we really got busy: Panama, Nicaragua, Haiti, Cuba, Guatemala, Dominican Republic — the list goes on. Sure we lost some of that but mostly because we let it go when we had gotten what we needed. The Lord helps him who helps himself. Thank you Lord.

All this has made us the best, strongest, richest country on the planet, led by the smartest, most articulate, caring and dedicated President the world has ever known.

Just remember folks we are still paying for this guy… and his security detail.