Ahmadinejad Won’t Say Yes-or-No to Nuclear Bomb

ABC News: "Will you say to the American people, tonight, that Iran will never weaponize nuclear material? There will be no nuclear weapon in Iran, ever?" she asked. Ahmadinejad declined to give a yes or no and did not positively rule out the possibility of an Iranian nuclear weapon. Instead, he shook his head and said, "We have got a saying Iran which says 'how many times shall I repeat the same thing?' You should say something only once. We have said once that we don't want nuclear bomb. We don't accept it."

December 22, 2009 at 8:17 am - ABC News
Dateline:
claspur   December 22nd, 2009 - 9:19 am

Bomba Dinnerjacket to glass.
Who cares what this Boys From Brazil Hitler-cloned defect has to say anymore.

LongMemory   December 22nd, 2009 - 9:31 am

*************************WARNING! THIS ISSUE is being USED to DIVERT YOU from (WHAT) your very own GOVERNMENT and THE BANKSTERS (Federal Reserve) are DOING to YOU!!! Wake Up MORONS!!! AMNESTY FOR TWENTY MILLION ILLEGALS (and) (4) of THEIR “RELATIVES” IS NEXT TO BE SHOVED DOWN YOUR THROATS BY THIS CONgress and this ADMINISTRATION!!! http://www.infowars.com

U.S.S.A.   December 22nd, 2009 - 9:41 am

Liberalism is an ideological nuclear bomb that has already obliterated America. This is NOT the country envisioned by our founders, but a different one entirely. U.S.A., R.I.P.! Welcome to the U.S.S.A.!

TearEmUp   December 22nd, 2009 - 10:18 am

That’s just because he doesn’t want to spoil the Hanukkah surprise for Israel……

Angry Xgen'er   December 22nd, 2009 - 10:35 am

TearEmUp December 22nd, 2009 – 10:18 am
That’s just because he doesn’t want to spoil the Hanukkah surprise for Israel…

Hanukkaka is over…fyi.

So to honor the next pending holiday:

Merry Christmas.

FastFacts   December 22nd, 2009 - 11:39 am

Can we believe anything that comes from this man’s mouth? He is the biggest bully, look at those they have captured on the water, those hikers they are using as political banter. Why does the American Media Machine allow this guy to speak to the world and spread his lies. Larry King Live, ABC, etc.

SOURCE OF IRANIAN UPDATES: http://www.americanparchment.com

H2K   December 22nd, 2009 - 11:51 am

One thing you can bet – Ahmadinejad feels emboldened with Obama at the helm. How does Obama think he can convince Iran to sit on the technology and not build a bomb? Bow him to death?

Dave, Tn   December 22nd, 2009 - 11:53 am

Why this can’t be true. I remember that BS NIE from 2007 the party loyalist New York media ran with saying we had years to deal with “the Iran problem”

Just wondering   December 22nd, 2009 - 12:20 pm

Why is it OK for Israel to have the bomb and not Iran? If you don’t want the Iranians or anyone else to pursue a nuclear bomb then you should demand that the Israelis destroy their nuclear warheads and agree to inspections so that they can’t make any more. Anything else is hypocrisy.

they didn't make them   December 22nd, 2009 - 12:56 pm

Just wondering December 22nd, 2009 – 12:20 pm

***so that they can’t make any more***

They didn’t make them, the USA did!!!

That is only one SMALL part of your IGNORANT post ding-a-ling!

Israel has NEVER stated they wanted to wipe out any other nation!

GET IT???

Boogy Man   December 22nd, 2009 - 12:58 pm

Israel needs to turn the sand in that land to glass

Just wondering   December 22nd, 2009 - 1:24 pm

They didn’t,
So the US made nukes and then gave them to Israel? And you call me ignorant! Somehow I don’t think that Nixon would be on board with that and he was president when the Israelis got their nukes.

Israel may not have stated that they want to wipe out another nation but if you think for one minute that they would hesitate to attack ANYONE in the world with nukes if they thought that it would serve their own narrow interests, you are dumber than your comments indicate which is pretty dumb.

GET IT????

ChuckyCheese1   December 22nd, 2009 - 1:30 pm

Just wondering wrote: “Why is it OK for Israel to have the bomb and not Iran? If you don’t want the Iranians or anyone else to pursue a nuclear bomb then you should demand that the Israelis destroy their nuclear warheads and agree to inspections so that they can’t make any more. Anything else is hypocrisy.”

Answer: Israel hasn’t threatened to wipe out Iran, and hasn’t wiped it out yet, even though it could. It’s like asking “why is it o.k. for a law abiding citizen to have a driver’s license, but not o.k. for a 13 year old kid who is in jail for grand theft auto, drunk driving, and attempted murder?” uh duh… because bad people can’t be trusted with big things that can kill people, especially when they’ve threatened to do it. Not saying Israel is always in the right, BUT they are not religious fanatics hoping to usher in the last imam through the obliteration of an entire people group… just sayin’

claspur   December 22nd, 2009 - 1:32 pm

just wondering @12:20

If you really study for say, a few hours, you can achieve a rational conclusion why Isreal has nukes to protect thenselves ubder muslin nations that only want to inialate them-off the face of the Earth.
Dinner Jacket in Iran has made how many such genocidal threats now?

ChuckyCheese1   December 22nd, 2009 - 1:33 pm

Just wondering,
It would be in Israel’s interest right now to wipe out Iran would it not?

TearEmUp   December 22nd, 2009 - 1:50 pm

@Angry Xgen’er thank you. I’m sorry I do not keep up on all the Jewish holidays.

@Just wondering. In all likely hood the French government, not the United States, helped Israel develop its nuclear program. Since Israel will not admit to having any nuclear weapons we can only speculate. But, in the early 60s the French government helped Israel set up its nuclear reactor, with the intention of power generating. It would not be far fetched to conceive deriving weapons grade material once any country has a nuclear reactor….

Just wondering   December 22nd, 2009 - 2:07 pm

TearEmUp,
You are probably correct. But the fact remains that the Israelis developed nukes and we did nothing. Now it seems a little hypocritical to be going after the Iranians for doing the same thing.

And ChuckyCheese, the majority of the Iranians are young and pretty progressive. I am not sure that dropping a nuke on them is the right way to influence events in the Middle East. Even traditional enemies of Iran like Saudi Arabia would be outraged. The entire Arab and Muslim world would be enflamed and our troops in the area would be at increase risk. I am not sure that this is such a hot idea. So, in answer to your question, it would not be in Israel’s interest to wipe out anyone.

ChuckyCheese1   December 22nd, 2009 - 2:28 pm

Just wondering, you are right about young Iranians, however, their government (as evidenced by the last election) doesn’t share or respect those ideals, but instead oppresses them. There were also Germans that opposed Hitler, but we still went to war with Germany. The benefit of war to Iran’s leadership is chiefly religious in nature (a strong motivator), and the benefit for Israel is survival (better to be alive and take a chance with a Mid-East that ALREADY hates you, then dead). You can’t “influence events in the Middle East” when you’re flesh is burning off the bone and your people are no more, so I think preventing that from happening is priority number 1. However, the difference is that I don’t think Israel would nuke/ “wipe out” Iran. They would strategically target the sites in question, and not the entire population. So the subsequent PR in the Mid-East might not be as bad as you think, and given that half of the Middle-East already hates Israel, it would not be much of a loss, regardless. If others make war with Israel merely for protecting itself, then that’s their own fault, and they will also have to accept any consequences that come their way from Israel and her allies. The only “threat” Israel has made is to protect itself from annihilation, which I think is reasonable gripe.

Just wondering   December 22nd, 2009 - 2:46 pm

cheese,
I agree that Israel has the right to protect itself. But, given that the Iranians have dispersed their nuclear sites over a wide area, it seems that a general nuclear attack is the only way to be sure of complete success. I would prefer a more surgical approach. Perhaps a specially trained team that could take out Ahmadinejad and the top mullahs at the same time would be more effective. That way it can be blamed on the internal Iranian politics, serve the same purpose, and not have excessive collateral damage.

Sean   December 22nd, 2009 - 4:14 pm

Israel is a democratic country with freedoms no other country in the Middle East has. They shoudl be permitted to have nuclear weapons for self defense. Israel has been threatned over and over again and it is in the best interest of the world that Israel and the USA act to stop iran from goign nuclear. yes, the world will hurt afterwards. It’s about time we got a little more concerned about what the world would be like with Iran as a nuclear power. While innocent people might lose their lives in an Israeli/USA attack….there could be millions of lives lost in Israel, Europe, and Irans neighboring countries. I think it’s tiem to look at the big picture.

Bill   December 22nd, 2009 - 4:57 pm

If a group of people camped in your backyard and then started taking over everything and claimed it was there right? Would you have the right to self defense ? The majority of israelis are Khazar not judean. It is a nation that basically showed up one day and took whatever they wanted. Israel is proof of a lawless world. Every nation should have nukes. It would stop war. In my opinion israel is the worst of nations,but the world that tolerates it is just as bad. There are no courts on earth that can be trusted,its all lies and might makes right. Money and force is the only thing respected. I anxiously await what is coming in the hopes that everyone dies. You know what kind of people you are and to say you don’t is a lie.

TearEmUp   December 22nd, 2009 - 8:36 pm

@Just wondering, There is one major difference between Israel and Iran having nuclear weapons. Israel never wanted to obliterate an entire religion from the planet….let alone an entire nation….

SanFranciscoGo   December 22nd, 2009 - 8:39 pm

Must be fueling up his brand new polished “I-slam” nuclear warheads, just for “fun”.

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.