Does Chris Wallace Roll His Eyes at End of Palin Interview?

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

"I don't know if you saw it yesterday, Chuck or Andrea, but at the end after Chris Wallace interviewed her, he did a collective eye roll for all his friends."

February 8, 2010 at 11:21 am - MSNBC
Dateline: New York, NY
s.houston   February 8th, 2010 - 11:35 am

There’s a reason education sucks and its the same reason that it will never ever ever be fixed. It’s never gonna get any better, don’t look for it, be happy with what you got. Because the owners of this country don’t want that, I’m talkin’ about the real owners now. The real owners, the big wealthy business interests that control things and make all the important decisions. Forget the politicians, the politicians are put there to give you the idea that you have freedom of choice, you don’t. You have no choice. You have owners. They own you. They own everything. They own all the important land, they own and control the corporations. They’ve long since bought and paid for the senate the congress the state houses the city halls, they got the judges in their back pockets and they own all the big media companies, so they control just about all of the news and information you get to hear. They got you by the balls, they spend billions of dollars every year lobbying to get what they want. Well we know what they want, they want more for themselves and less for everybody else.

But I’ll tell you what they don’t want. They don’t want a population of citizens capable of critical thinking. They don’t want well informed, well educated people capable of critical thinking. They are not interested in that. That doesn’t help them, that’s against their interests. They don’t want who are smart enough to sit around the kitchen table to figure out how badly their gettin’ ****** by a system that threw them overboard 30 ******’ years ago. They don’t want that. You know what they want? They want obedient workers. Obedient workers, people who are just smart enough to run the machines and do the paperwork, and just dumb enough to passively accept all these increasingly worse jobs with the lower pay the longer hours the reduced benefits the end of overtime, and the vanishing pension that disappears the moment you go to collect it. And now they’re comin’ for your social security money. They want your ******’ retirement money. They want it back so they can give it to their criminal friends on wall street. And you know something? They’ll get it, they’ll get it all from you sooner or later. They own this ******’ place. It’s a big club, and YOU ain’t in it. You and I are not in the big club. By the way, it’s the same big club they use to beat you over the head with all day long when they tell you what to believe. All day long, beating you over the head in their media tellin’ ya what to believe, what to think, and what to buy.

The table is tilted folks. The game is rigged. And nobody seems to notice, nobody seems to care. Good honest hard working people, white collar, blue collar, it doesn’t matter what color shirt you have on. Good honest hard working people, these are people with modest means, continue to elect these rich cocksuckers who don’t give a **** about them. They don’t give a **** about you. They don’t give a **** about you, they don’t care about you, at all. And nobody seems to notice, nobody seems to care. That’s what the owners count on, the fact that Americans will probably remain willfully ignorant of the big red white and blue **** that’s being jammed up their ******** everyday. Because the owners of this country know the truth. It’s called the American dream, you have to be asleep to believe it. -George Carlin

weird   February 8th, 2010 - 11:38 am

libs criticizing Palin? weird.

hempstead1944   February 8th, 2010 - 11:39 am

Chris needs to take his buddy and kindred spirit, Geraldo, and go to work back in the MSM. They obviously cannot stomach middle America anymore. It is like watching the little Dutch Boy trying to plug the dike and it just keeps springing more and more leaks. Chris….go away! You are a fake and always have been one.

Maine Coast   February 8th, 2010 - 11:43 am

Liberalism is a mental disorder. Andrea Mitchell proves it again.

General Patton   February 8th, 2010 - 11:46 am

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ PALIN is a QUITTER, a sell-out, and a globalist trojan horse, VET HER HARSHLY about the fed,,, the i.m.f.,,,, the u.n.,,,,,,the offshore banksters (putting (in) presidents),,, the E.P.A.ENVIRONMENTALIST TRAITORS,,,the CHEMTRAILS BEING SPRAYED ON ALL AMERICANS,,,the POISONING OF OUR FOOD and WATER,,,PAULSON, GEITHNER and BERNANKE,,,and ON and ON and ON! re: http://www.infowars.com <FOR YOUR VERY OWN personal magnifying glass!

fulljump   February 8th, 2010 - 11:48 am

Reagan quote 1980 campaign “There you go again”

Rexter   February 8th, 2010 - 11:49 am

More shape shifting.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qj8741m2jLc

briany   February 8th, 2010 - 11:50 am

WOW!!! They are REALLY stretching for this one…..LOL!!! What a joke. All they can come up with is THAT??? WOW!!! What intillectuals they are…. ;-) ….gag.

They are in DEEP DOO DOO and they Know it…

K   February 8th, 2010 - 11:52 am

Chris has beady eyes to begin with. He’s also been feeling nervous all week about this interview, after that sour joke on Imus. Stupid Imus asked Chris if Sarah would be doing the interview on his lap. Chris added fuel to the fire by saying, “One can only hope.” or something like that.

Eyeroll? Man, that’s stretching it!

As always, Sarah’s got the left running scared!

mac691   February 8th, 2010 - 11:55 am

What a bunch of morons. Comparing a one time writing on her hand with a continual never ending use of the teleprompter, for everything and anything, and having scripted questions prescreened is not quite the same thing as writing a couple of words on one’s palm. I also remember someone else who didn’t talk “the same as top tier political figures” and that was Reagan. Joe, how did he do? I used to think of Joe as a genuine conservative, and now he is just another MSNBC loser. What fitting company.

Hooked on Obonics   February 8th, 2010 - 11:55 am

The left is sooooooooo freaked out by her. Nice!

john   February 8th, 2010 - 11:57 am

.

Would that be the same Chris Wallace who stated Obama and the White House staff were the worst bunch of Whiney Crybabies he’s seen in 40 years?

Roll that clip again! There was no imagination required for that one!

.

wallyintouch   February 8th, 2010 - 11:58 am

NBC= Not Being Clever, Never Been Cool, Nothing But Communistic, No (Bleeping) Clue, Nuisance B(s) Comments, National Barack Conspirators, etc… I don’t believe you are even considered MSM anymore, get in touch with reality

Rexter   February 8th, 2010 - 12:02 pm

mac691 – the “Pro-Life” types you have to watch – they are driven by emotion which makes them cousins of Liberals even if they happen to call themselves conservatives.

I'm Gumby damn it!   February 8th, 2010 - 12:03 pm

I’m so sick of these brainless commies.

If I lived in New York I’d be clubbing them on the streets like baby harp seals.

DrBluess   February 8th, 2010 - 12:07 pm

Sarah Palin is incredible! Conservative, family-first, pro-life, pro-guns, smart, gorgeous, knowledgeable, highly accomplished, well respected, great communicator, charming, popular, a force to be reckoned with… No wonder Liberals HATE her so much!

BILL5321   February 8th, 2010 - 12:09 pm

Palin is having the last laught.

Has anyone see CBS or NBC news ratings. Both networks management must have their heads up their @ss. The unprofessional reporting is kills their business.

GO FOX!!!

Linus   February 8th, 2010 - 12:11 pm

andrea’s hand list: 1) giving greenspan his morning bath
2) apply Rogain to bald spot.
3) pray to bolshevik gods that I don’t get fact checked today.
4) EAT YOUR PRUNES!

an irrelevant old hag needy for attention.

jp2feminist   February 8th, 2010 - 12:11 pm

A long, long, LONG time ago, I used to think that Andrea Mitchell was a decent reporter. Did I wake up or did she change???

James   February 8th, 2010 - 12:14 pm

I just realized what all these liberal dolts are doing…. they are collectively reinforcing each other by doing the circle thing… “did you see that eyeroll” “yeah” “you too?” and around and around it goes until they are all feeling a little bit more secure in their idiocy and a little more secure in the thought that maybe they aren’t totally out of touch. Did you notice that he said that imaginary eye roll was for “all his friends” …. meaning they are part of that special inside group of assholes? Look, they need this self directed reinforcement… otherwise they would have to realize their inner thoughts that they are actually irrelevant and nobody cares what they think or say…. you think they aren’t painfully aware of the fact that the MSM is in the crapper in the ratings? That crapping out MSM is them…. they are scared that nobody cares what they say or do. Its actually funny watching the circle of back patting dolts.
When Andrea Mitchell and Halperin are part of a group, you know how irrelevant that group is outside of its circle.

Sage   February 8th, 2010 - 12:14 pm

What is a morning joe?

Susan   February 8th, 2010 - 12:15 pm

I didn’t see an “eyeroll”…and I don’t think Wallace would have the nerve to “eyeroll” Palin in a patronizing fashion, after remarking that he wanted her to sit on his lap for the interview.

The interview was fantastic, by the way…obviously they trying to “spin it” negatively for all those who did not actually watch it.

gobnait   February 8th, 2010 - 12:15 pm

Mitchell is the hyper-hypocritical poster girl for ’snarky’ and nasty. she thinks that the right is reduced to name-calling and insults?! Morning Joe and minions are hilarious to watch in their smug, self-important commentary. They believe that they have their collective finger on the pulse of the ‘real’ Americans. Could they BE any less self-aware?

easye   February 8th, 2010 - 12:19 pm

The arrogance of the left is what will get them in the end. The people on that network are all morons! Its humorous!

kailuagirl   February 8th, 2010 - 12:19 pm

YES he did. As a matter of fact, three of us looked at each other at the same time and said “did you see that look…OMG…what an arrogant xxxxx”! Was that the look of disappointment…bummer, she did not climb in your lap! Verbalization makes up just 12% of the total of the effect of human communication, and YES, Mr. Wallace’s body language was loud and clear. These FOXsters are no different than ANY of all of the other foreign owned and controlled teleprompter-dictated empty suits. Take away that ear-piece-feed & teleprompter, and they are clueless, just like the “ONE” “FAIRY-TALE”. You need only look at the media absorption to market share stats to understand, these media ilk are dinosaur’s, out with last year’s newspaper to the garbage heap of history. They get paid big bucks to continuously entertain and distract. The Society of American Archivists and the American Library Association were prior critical of Bush’s exercise of executive power by issuing Executive Order 13233. They claimed that Bush’s action “violates both the spirit and letter of existing U.S. law on access to presidential papers as clearly laid down in 44 U.S.C. § 2201–2207,” noting that EO13233 “potentially threatens to undermine one of the very foundations of our nation.”. The core of Bush Executive Order 13233 relates to determinations for non-disclosure of documents involving POTUS. Most media elites praised BHO for “his immediate and timely” Revocation of the Bush EO13233 of November 1, 2001. The majority of media and so-called news-outlets praised and promoted the BHO REVOCATION “as being proof of a new beginning of government transparency”. However, these hypocrites conveniently failed to accurately provide the whole [fair and balanced] story involving Obama’s very first day in office [Jan 21st, 2009]; in fact, when Obama implemented and signed into law POTUS Executive Order 13489 the media elites specifically failed to report or mention [BHO EO13489] Sec.2 Notice Of Intent To Disclose Presidential Records, which specifically includes, “When the Archivist provides notice to the incumbent and former Presidents of his intent to disclose Presidential records pursuant to section 1270.46 of the NARA regulations, the Archivist, using any guidelines provided by the incumbent and former Presidents, shall identify any specific materials, the disclosure of which he believes may raise a substantial question of executive privilege.” WHAT DID THAT SAY? At minimum, BHO Executive Order 13489 is a devious intention to obstruct justice to prevent any disclosure relating to BHO AS POTUS. It is stunning that the first order of business Obama took care of on day one of his Presidency was to sign as POTUS an Executive Order that states that only the records he chooses to be made public will be released! Shockingly, this is the subject that was at the absolute top of his agenda in the first hours of this “historic presidency”? YET THE “USA-NEWS” INSTEAD RELEASED PROPAGANDA RELATING TO THE REVOCATION OF THE BUSH EXECUTIVE ORDER 13233 [AND NOT THE PREDOMINATE MAJORITY CONTENTS OF THE BHO EXECUTIVE ORDER 13489]. AND THE PRE-MEDITATED BHO “DON’T ASK DON’T TELL POLICY” CONTINUES TO THIS DATE.

fulljump   February 8th, 2010 - 12:20 pm

Every time that Reagan was attacked he smiled and polity laugh it off in a simple folksy joke, and the majority of the country smiled, and laughed with him. He was NOT always serous especially when attacked, these professional pundits can’t remember that?

dems-need-sarah-to-run-more-than-they-know   February 8th, 2010 - 12:20 pm

I must agree its hard to keep and play a straight face with a SIMPLETON. but as a Democrat I hope she

runs in 2012, its never a dull moment, Even if many Dems who are annoyed and say they will stay home

2012, the sight of palin for some reason channel them to want to run to a voting booth just to make sure

she doesn’t get near that W.H. Now if its someone like a pawlenthy who doesn’t make you

want to leave your couch as a dem to go stop him,can very well win by default.

Brian   February 8th, 2010 - 12:20 pm

A group of people, led by one who’s favorite founding father is Lincoln, does not have a foundation on which to criticize the political ignorance of a 4th grader.

Calvin&Hobbes   February 8th, 2010 - 12:21 pm

The Democratic Party Baby Killers are at again.

The is the best they have against Sarah Palin?

Good grief these baby killers are morons.

***** Sarah Palin for President 2012 *****

Dick Tuck   February 8th, 2010 - 12:23 pm

I understand “watching the grass grow” has higher ratings than this CNN hack.

irishkay   February 8th, 2010 - 12:23 pm

ANDREA SHOULD TALK!!
Check out her wrist as she displays her hand!!! IT’S A BAND AROUND HER WRIST THAT SAYS ‘TRACK PALIN!!
What a pompous disingenuous azz!

SHE HAS A CHEAT SHEET TOO!!!!!!!!! As a bracelet!!!!!

Duck Tuck   February 8th, 2010 - 12:28 pm

Better her than a transparent phony who voted “present” 179 times so as not to establish any kind of record, which, along with his “color” was supposed to make him immune from criticism.

uberVU - social comments   February 8th, 2010 - 12:32 pm

Social comments and analytics for this post…

This post was mentioned on Twitter by notleftwing: {breitbart} Does Chris Wallace Roll His Eyes at End of Palin Interview? http://bit.ly/dsfZKE...

kailuagirl   February 8th, 2010 - 12:36 pm

Yes he did.

K   February 8th, 2010 - 12:38 pm

Brietbart, why aren’t my comments getting posted?

AJ   February 8th, 2010 - 12:41 pm

I really think that right after saying how mean Palin was Andrea mocks…How grown up.

Dave Aldsworth   February 8th, 2010 - 12:42 pm

PDS

Doogie   February 8th, 2010 - 12:47 pm

Everyone in favor of having Brit Hume replace Chris Wallace say “Tea Bag”!!

eRtwngr   February 8th, 2010 - 12:58 pm

I wouldn’t even know what these shows are or what they’re saying on them if conservative sites didn’t report on it. From looking at the ratings, I’m not alone.

All of a sudden these liberals have respect for Reagan? Right…

yourplastic   February 8th, 2010 - 1:23 pm

The real news here is as old as humanity itself…humans fear that which they do not understand. In this video, you are watching MSNBC’s frantic response as their insular elitist world is crumbling from the very thing they fear most; irrelevance.

Case in point: A split-second eye flutter by an interviewer on another network, which could be interpreted any number of ways IF you believe it actually means *anything* at all, somehow justifies a 5-way split screen on MSNBC with 7 people talking about it for 4:33?

Irrelevant people on an irrelevant network yammering on about an irrelevant topic; and the only people who pay any attention at all are those of us who find humor in watching them decompose in the empty nakedness of their conceit.

ben Ish   February 8th, 2010 - 1:31 pm

So

They ATTACK Palin for being “snarky” but they APPROVE of Chris Mathews eye roll?

Wow. Just *#*(*^%# wow.

appalled lurker   February 8th, 2010 - 1:42 pm

This is going out to several blogs and threads because it needs to be stated:

Bottom line, -and I do mean BOTTOM line- all of you out there criticizing Palin for having a hangnail should think again before you go on to defend flop ears for being the president… because that’s where you LOSE the argument, ANY argument, completely. The bold faced temerity of all of you is beyond belief! America has as its occupant in the U.S. White House most likely the WORST president ever in our existence. Every one of you 0-holes has NO ROOM TO CRITICIZE a single aspiring political prospect right now. Most people in your place would be hiding under the sheets every morning before heading out to face the inveterate idiocy of a *leader* that you voted in, not to mention — what the U.S. has been forced to be shamed with.

You don’t like Sarah Palin? Fine! Be big enough to JUST SAY IT! And then stop there, stop right there…because every single torpid one of you uh-Os HAS ABSOLUTELY NO ROOM TO TALK BEYOND THAT!

btw, how is that hopey changey stuff working out for ‘ya?

Guest   February 8th, 2010 - 1:43 pm

He was just experiencing another of those leg thingees he is famous for. Apparently it’s not just limited to men.

briany   February 8th, 2010 - 2:08 pm

Rasmussen: 75% don’t like current liberal policies.
Gallup: 80% don’t like current liberal policies.
Gallup: 90% of both Independents & Republicans don’t want liberal policies….

Keep it up Demcrats/Socialist/Maoisst/Marxist/Progressives….Keep pushing your policies….Thank You…Thank You…Thank You!!!

Thor   February 8th, 2010 - 2:26 pm

Don’t give this story the time of day folks. It’s as phony as a a moderate Democrat.

Amy White   February 8th, 2010 - 2:31 pm

Boy you bunch of losers keep on fishing. Maybe, maybe, you’ll pull in 1-2 more listeners, though I’m thinking most people are too smart to waste their time watching a program that is on the way out anyway… Just sayin… ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

snarky?   February 8th, 2010 - 2:48 pm

how dare that snark andrea mock Palin! what has happened to scarborough?
All these folks can stay put at msnbc…mean spirited nbc.
And, I did not see Wallace “roll his eyes.”

Matt   February 8th, 2010 - 2:54 pm

“Corpsman” You are comparing Palin to an idiot that does not know how to pronounce the word Corpsman and is the Commander in Chief.

Chebacco   February 8th, 2010 - 3:28 pm

So they equate “notes” consisting of 3 words, topics not to forget, with Obama reading from his ever present teleprompter. And Andrea is sounding pretty shrill about it. Don’t you think?

wimperwimper   February 8th, 2010 - 3:29 pm

HEY STUPID – yes scarborough???? You are a flaming idiot – obviously the only place you can keep a job is to work for the LOSERS!!!! YOU are at the top of the 75% that detest LIBS – you are lower then low – stay there at msnbc because nobody watches them. Got suck eggs

NEOFREEDOM   February 8th, 2010 - 3:53 pm

Andrea Mitchell MSNBC NEWS STFU !

mms   February 8th, 2010 - 3:54 pm

Wow Socialist / Marxist liberals bashing Palin,… now thats news!!!

mms   February 8th, 2010 - 4:32 pm

All of those Socialist feel very smart as they bash Palin, but they don’t look very smart, they look like what they are Propagandist for the Marxist in chief

ssvit   February 8th, 2010 - 4:35 pm

Is CNN still on the air?

Phil   February 8th, 2010 - 4:47 pm

Palin debates Larry King on the issues:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5rSNGnYvF8k

roxie s   February 8th, 2010 - 5:17 pm

Chris Wallace needs to join his fellow snarksters at MSNBC. Fox can do better.

Paul   February 8th, 2010 - 5:33 pm

Oh please, please nominate her to be the Republican presidential nominee in 2012! Hilarity will follow her everywhere she goes and says something retarded. It will be pure entertainment. On top of that, you sensitive Republican Dittoheads will be huffing and puffing and crying everytime some mean Democrat is “unfair” to her, by asking her real questions. It would be a good time reading you guys in full meltdown. Seriously though, she’s a joke and anyone who really believes she going to get the nomination or beat Obama needs their head examined.

Paul   February 8th, 2010 - 5:53 pm

Wallace totally rolled his eyes! Hilarious! I bet they just laugh at her over at Fox, even Beck! HAHAHA!

Hooked on Obonics   February 8th, 2010 - 6:29 pm

@yourplastic February 8th, 2010 – 1:23 pm

Well said…well said!

Whatwhatwhat   February 8th, 2010 - 6:42 pm

At least he waited to the end. Most of us start rolling our eyes after the first BS sentence that comes out of her mouth.

melli50   February 8th, 2010 - 6:53 pm

Sarah Palin has the left scared to death! Go Sarah! Palin 2012!

shane2813   February 8th, 2010 - 7:00 pm

It’s funny seeing a show that has more guests than viewers. MARXIST=DEMOCRATS=TERRORIST All the same.

testicular man   February 8th, 2010 - 7:34 pm

F**k George Carlin! He was very rich himself, but a very very funny rich c**k sucker, that always took sides with the liberal left! So S.HOUSTON, if you think you’re intelligent because you’re quoting George Carlin from one of your favorite albums, take that sh*t down the road because I’m not buying it…!!! Right, the fix is in, the show is rigged and your man Obama and his band of doofuses are in control of this country, but not for long, thank God.

Irene Flick   February 8th, 2010 - 7:38 pm

That Andrea is one ugly broad, inside and out. Her maturity level is less than my high school students. It is very sad that anyone would pay her to act like that.

pepito cojones   February 8th, 2010 - 7:50 pm

The eye roll is BS. There was no eye roll. Look, Obama spoke well and what. What has the creep done? NOTHING!!!
Andrea Mitchell has no credibility so I wish she would just shut her useless trap down! NBC is a “gutter network”…

claspur   February 8th, 2010 - 7:56 pm

*check

briany   February 8th, 2010 - 8:00 pm

Rasmussen: 75% don’t like current liberal policies.
Gallup: 80% don’t like current liberal policies.
Gallup: 90% of both Independents & Republicans don’t want liberal policies….

Keep it up Demcrats/Socialist/Maoisst/Marxist/Progressives….Keep pushing your policies….Thank You…Thank You…Thank You!!!

Peace Sister   February 8th, 2010 - 8:06 pm

I saw the look when it happened, but I had the impression then that he got caught not ready to be on air. I think that option is worth looking into.

incredulous   February 8th, 2010 - 8:16 pm

Who’s snarky Andrea?

Juanita   February 8th, 2010 - 8:43 pm

It wasn’t an eyeroll. Chris Wallace was just glancing from the live feed (at his left) to the camera in front of him. It was the result of an awkward equipment set-up in the makeshift Nashville studio. In fact, Wallace did the same supposed “eyeroll” at least three times later in the show: After a clip of Kit Bond before he introduces the Sunday Panel; after a clip of Palin’s convention speech before the last Sunday Panel segment; and after the pre-recorded interview with Mark Skoda. Yes, I re-watched the show after this stupid controversy emerged.

Wallace apparently watched the live feed of the show on a screen to his left, and when a pre-recorded clip ended, he glanced from that screen to the camera, then back to the screen (where he probably saw a live shot of himself looking off camera). Each time he quickly looked back at the camera and started addressing the audience or the Sunday Panel.

This was most noticeable after the Palin interview, because it was early in the show. Wallace was more subtle with his furtive glances later in the show, because he had already seen on the live feed that his transitions weren’t smooth.

Bite me, Palin haters.

Juanita   February 8th, 2010 - 9:02 pm

It wasn’t an eyeroll. Chris Wallace was just glancing from the live feed (at his left) to the camera in front of him. It was the result of an awkward equipment set-up in the makeshift Nashville studio. In fact, Wallace did the same supposed “eyeroll” at least three times later in the show: After a clip of Kit Bond before he introduces the Sunday Panel; after a clip of Palin’s convention speech before the last Sunday Panel segment; and after the pre-recorded interview with Mark Skoda. Yes, I re-watched the show after this stupid controversy emerged.

Wallace apparently watched the live feed of the show on a screen to his left, and when a pre-recorded clip ended, he glanced from that screen to the camera, then back to the screen (where he probably saw a live shot of himself looking off camera). Each time he quickly looked back at the camera and started addressing the audience or the Sunday Panel.

This was most noticeable after the Palin interview, because it was early in the show. Wallace was more subtle with his furtive glances later in the show, because he had already seen on the live feed that his transitions weren’t smooth.

Juanita   February 8th, 2010 - 9:38 pm

Sorry for the double post. I thought I’d been blocked for writing “Bite me.”

Ham   February 8th, 2010 - 9:54 pm

JOE STATES THAT PALIN IS NOT AS ARTICULATE JOE BIDEN, NOR AS WELL READ AS HE IS????

Robert   February 8th, 2010 - 10:10 pm

You idiot libs are showing your hand. You are really afraid of this woman. Desperation overload.

CHRIS WALLACE IS OLD SCHOOL   February 8th, 2010 - 10:20 pm

WHO GIVES A CRAP ABOUT THIS GUY, MOVE ON AMERICA!

CHRIS WALLACE IS OLD SCHOOL   February 8th, 2010 - 10:21 pm

WHO CARES ABOUT THIS GUY, MOVE ON AMERICA

sirwinston   February 8th, 2010 - 11:04 pm

Come on, all you Andrea Mitchell critics. What do you expect from a no talent leftist hack who saw an opportunity to create a journalism career for herself through her ability to latch onto that mother of all trophy husbands — Alan Greenspan.

SirWinston   February 8th, 2010 - 11:50 pm

Get serious! That was no eye roll!

It’s been said on numerous occasions that I do one of the best eye rolls in the US, so I know eye rolls. Chris Wallace did not even come close to executing an eye roll at the end of the Palin interview.

In fact, I’m now beginning to wonder if you people even have a clue as to what an eye roll looks like.

happy   February 8th, 2010 - 11:54 pm

All of the east coast blabber mouths have Sally Quinn-itis.

They can’t fathom being knee deep in fish guts and moose stew.

They are probably horrified that they might be offered a beer at Palin’s White House.

This is so fun.

There won’t be enough mousse or hair gel to fix the hair standing up on their heads when she gives her first State of the Union.

Sick of Lies (and will vote accordingly)   February 9th, 2010 - 1:29 am

These people are such fools. That wasn’t an “eye roll,” and there’s no comparison between three succinct bullet points and two high tech teleprompters. They’re all foolishly avoiding the widely held beliefs that Palin expressed, and are trying to divert attention elsewhere.

dayan33   February 9th, 2010 - 3:45 am

As a committed far-right Republican, I HAVE TO ADMIT THAT SARAH PALIN IS JUST PLAIN AWFUL! SHE STINKS! She embarrasses the TEA Partiers, and I will be damned if she gets ANY national nomination, let alone an appointment…

alice   February 9th, 2010 - 8:07 am

The jealousy was thick on that set.. WOW Mitchell on Palin..”They are building her a set in her house.” LOL

Willy Brown   February 9th, 2010 - 8:18 am

I love how Sarah Palin screws with the libtards even Morning joke.

walstib   February 9th, 2010 - 9:57 am

Andrea Mitchell and MSNBC are still around? Their ratings reveal that the vast majority of people find that what they say is irrelevant.

Mouser   February 9th, 2010 - 11:44 am

What is MSNBC?

Off Duty   February 9th, 2010 - 11:36 pm

Chris Wallace….son of Mike Wallace, that’s right cbs/60 minutes Mike Wallace….is NO CONSERVATIVE.

So he rolls his eyes? It’s in his DNA. What else is new?

tedsalad   February 10th, 2010 - 12:04 am

Andrea Mitchell is ugly in more ways than one…

ss   February 10th, 2010 - 10:31 am

THE ATTACK OF CHRIS SHOWS HOW DESPERATE AND UNIMPORTANT MSNBC REALLY IS.

SS   February 10th, 2010 - 10:34 am

MSNBC= MERE SUBSTANCE NOT BEING CONSIDERED.

SS   February 10th, 2010 - 10:48 am

GIVE ANDREA BREAK, SHE’S GOTTA FACE GREENSPAN IN BED EVERY NIGHT.

hypotheek   August 12th, 2010 - 12:49 pm

Hypotheek informatie, hypotheek aanvragen of afsluiten? Hypotheekrentes bekijken. Hypotheek aanbieders vergelijken, hypotheek vormen, bijkomende kosten,

lenen   August 14th, 2010 - 10:23 am

BKR problemen? Nu Geld lenen zonder BKR toetsing? Op zoek naar betrouwbare aanbieders? Wij vergelijken banken die u toch kunnen helpen aan een betrouwbare

lenen zonder bkr toetsing   August 15th, 2010 - 1:36 pm

Over de voor- en nadelen van het afsluiten van een lening zonder BKR-toetsing.

g1 wallpaper   August 25th, 2010 - 4:23 am

Great entry thanks, needed a few more pictures though.

Soccer Shop   August 28th, 2010 - 1:05 pm

Tour Edge at soccer shop. Winn at soccer equipment. Rife Putters at soccer goals. Power Driver at soccer uniforms. Mentor Putting at soccer store. SMT at soccer gear and Bolle.

Soccer Shop   August 28th, 2010 - 1:13 pm

I like this site, clean design! is it a template?

payday loans   August 28th, 2010 - 4:18 pm

I must say that overall I am very taken with this site. It is apparent that you know you subject matter and you are passionate about it. I wish I had got your ability to write. I have bookmarked your site and look forward to more updates.

Euro Millions   September 2nd, 2010 - 12:42 pm

Great entry thanks, needed a few more pictures though.

black halter dress   September 2nd, 2010 - 10:40 pm

It’s interesting how many information come out so often

white halter dress   September 3rd, 2010 - 8:26 pm

i really never thinking about that point. but also i’m a real newbie about that

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.