‘Creation Science Evangelism’ Group Ridicules Effort to Create Chickenosaurus

AP: After years spent hunting for the buried remains of prehistoric animals, a Canadian paleontologist now plans to manipulate chicken embryos to show he can create a dinosaur.

August 25, 2009 at 3:11 pm - Creation Science Evangelism
Dateline: Pensacola, FL
If it t'aint in the Bible, it didn't happen.   August 25th, 2009 - 3:39 pm

It will be even funnier when one of those chickens takes a bit out of one of their ignorant Christian rear-ends.

Jonny   August 25th, 2009 - 6:44 pm

Someone has been reading the Bible way too literally

Joel   August 25th, 2009 - 7:12 pm

Evolution has never been about science. Its about politics. Those missing link discoveries that fill the media airways every six months is part of a propaganda war. Mao when instituting communism in China taught the people evolution before he turned them into Marxist.

kmichaels   August 26th, 2009 - 11:46 am

Jonny, what part of this video has to do with reading the Bible too literally. What was said that you disagree with. Here is a wise bible statement “A fool answers a question before he hears it.”

That fool Jonny, is you.

Donald   August 26th, 2009 - 3:24 pm

“Creation Researcher” seems to be their common title, where did they get their degrees in that? What training or expertise do these yahoos have to state anything as fact or venture an expert opinion? ‘Don’t read too good’? Don’t speak too good, either.

DEF   August 27th, 2009 - 1:07 am

Very articulate, after the butterflies of nervousness cleared the air of your presentation!!! Your youthful awareness of common sense and questioning the teachings by the educational system is rare in today’s time period of denying explanations of life in the book opposing their view point (The Bible), their opposition in belief))!!! Why is it so important for them to discredit the Bible and it’s teachings??? Does the Bible also discredit them and their teachings??? Are you on this earth, or are you of this earth? Did you evolve from this earth or were you placed on this earth? Are you in harmony with this earth and it’s environment or are you alien to it? Are you an alien on earth since you clothe yourself, shelter yourself, entertain yourself, question yourself? Who are you, where did you come from, what are you seeking and where do you go when you leave here? and arrive there? Do you or the ones you empower as governors over you, have dominion over earth? Can you look at yourself from the neck up or beyond your shoulders backward, are you on the inside looking out? Is there a greater power over you, that you don’t understand, that dwells within you? Just a few questions to break the boredom of mans teachings!!! The Bible wasn’t scribed long ago so you would understand it the day you read it, in most cases recognition of it’s meaning comes later in life, through your experiences!! At that point in your life you (The one that read the ink dried pages), can say ok, that’s weird, now I understand and deny the revelation that you felt when you finally understood what you read long ago and your memory brought back, at that awakening moment and continue on the same path to calamity that brought on the déjà vu (Turn away from (Defy (Continue doing in denial of the adverse consequences of your current actions and beliefs))) or they can accept reality and realize the self guilt for causing the catastrophes of their detrimental (Sinful) actions to themselves and/or others and stop doing those things (Turn away from (Repent (Stop doing)))!!!! The god of evolution is at war with the God of creation, one preaches govern yourself, the other preaches it must govern, with an iron fist if necessary. Your choice, choose wisely!!!!!

That Guy   August 27th, 2009 - 10:02 am

This video is an absolute joke. Rolling your eyes and guffawing loudly is not an argument. If every school in America required a class in critical thinking (yes, Virginia, it’s something you can study), these guys would be out of whatever jobs they are able to hold without a truly scientific background.

Big Cris   August 29th, 2009 - 7:58 am

Evolution is definitely the dumbest idea since the dawn of humanity. I absolutely
agree with Joel’s comment when he said that evolution had never been about science
and is only about politics. That’s why when creationist’s debate evolutionist’s,
the evolutionist’s always lose. Even the most devout evolutionist cannot clearly
answer simple questions as to what evidence they have for what they believe.
I suggest reading a book by Henry Morris titled
“That Their Words May Be Used Against Them” because in it he gathers quotes from
evolutionist’s own mouth that reveals even they cannot defend the theories
they hold to. I have a question for evolutionists, “What science do we have that
supports life coming from non-life”? How exactly did that happen? Evolutionists
teach that life began as a “complex chemical soup” from the bottom of the ocean
floor. What??? They claim that millions of years of torrential rain came down on the
rocks and in this chemical soup were the ingredients for life. I challenge
evolutionist’s to not simply say “creation is dumb” or “science proves evolution”
or phrases of the sort, but rather give us something specific as to how you believe
evolution is true. Their is no evidence for evolution!

Cris

Cogito Ergo Sum   August 30th, 2009 - 10:43 pm

The essence of the scientific method is to take observable facts, then build a testable theory that explains those facts. If scientists seem “devout” about evolution, it is simply because it is the best theory available which seems to flow naturally from a plethora of observations, which are remarkably consistent across a range of disciplines, from astronomy to paleontology to genetics. The theory is constantly being “tested” by the discovery of new facts, all of which confirm the general idea of evolution, although scientific understanding of the precise mechanisms involved has, of course, improved over time. Evolution has plenty of evidence to back it up, and it’s certainly not inconsistent with the idea of an ultimate Creator…the real “debate”, as such, is about the mechanism of Creation. Typically the idea of “creationism” as opposed to evolution refers to the idea that the entire universe (or at least Earth) was created some thousands of years ago over a period of a few days. Certainly such an idea is not impossible given the existence of a Creator, but it does not derive naturally from any known set of observable facts, and, in fact, plenty of facts exist which (using the testability requirement) directly contradict a theory of instantaneous and relatively recent creation, independent of the merits of evolutionary theory.

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.