Cafferty: I Hope Hillary Clinton Challenges Obama in 2012

Jack Cafferty: "For her part, Clinton tells PBS she is 'absolutely not interested' in running again for president. But in the same interview, she suggests she is a one-term secretary of state. Clinton says considering the demands of the job, eight years would be very challenging. No doubt all this has helped stoke chatter about Clinton leaving the cabinet sometime in the president's first term - perhaps over a matter of principle - so she could be in place to challenge Mr. Obama in the primaries in 2012. For Hillary's supporters, it might just be wishful thinking, but history suggests it's not a good idea to ever count a Clinton out."

January 29, 2010 at 12:02 pm - CNN
Dateline: Washington DC
Eileen for Freedom/Liberty   January 29th, 2010 - 10:12 am

America…one crook to replace another?

Hillary is, and always has been, surrounded with corruption! Going back to the Rose Law Firm, the firing of the White House travel staff, etc.

She is also a Bilderberg…both she and Slick Willie “the inept”!

She is not the answer for America…she is just another version of Bilderberg Bush-Obama!

She gets her marching orders from the Bilderberg also!

We need a good, clean candidate for the Presidency…not just another slug of the ‘mentally unstable’ Democratzi who take their marching orders from outside the United States of America!

This guy hasn’t got a clue…but we do!

—————————————-

THE VOTER REVOLUTION OF 2010 HAS BEGUN!

1. WE ARE INFORMED
2. WE ARE INVOLVED
3. WE ARE GETTING OUT THE VOTE!

ONE (1) SLUG DOWN…FIFTY-NINE (59) SLUGS TO GO – GUARANTEED!

IMPEACHMENT OR THE ‘ORIGINAL’ RECORDS OF BIRTH…IT IS JUST A MATTER OF TIME…AND 2010 WILL BE THE TIME!

poetopoet   January 29th, 2010 - 11:02 am

And let’s forget all bleeders (hemophiliacs) in Canada, B. Clinton killed, by forging blood bank contracts given by prisoners with aids in Arkansas as governor.

As Too Dumb to Thrive the liberal demoncrats with Hillary Clinton as the liberal-progressive leader to beat in 2012, she said it and wants it more than ever! Their heroes at the peak of its popularity “in the liberal progressive eugenics movement” that was supported by prominent people, including Margaret Sanger, Marie Stopes, H. G. Wells, Emile Zola, George Bernard Shaw, John Maynard Keynes, John Harvey Kellogg, Linus Pauling and Sidney Webb.

Eugenics most infamous proponent and practitioner was however Adolf Hitler who praised and incorporated eugenic ideas in Mein Kampf, and emulated Eugenic legislation for the sterilization of “defectives and others” that had been pioneered in the United States, by two presidents, Woodrow Wilson and Theodore Roosevelt. Why the NAACP and Jewish communities are such progressive liberal demoncrat supporters beats me, with such facts.

Nice stuff for the “progressive aka liberal” corrosive movement puppeteers?
Now, that totally Obama what’s to complete it, over America’s dead democracy and economy.

And they dare to talk about and damn the Birthers (Obama’s illegal presidency), Conservatives, Christians, Pro-lifers, and The Tea Party in the same breath.

The only fools who follow them are illegal welfare recipients, Muslims, and x-cons of all type, the Acorn thugs, and basic sociopaths; all crazies to the bone, and never forget the left-over displaced despot intellectual Bolsheviks like NYTs Krugman, Times Klein and Newsweek’s Fineman, who praise Obama, along with the NAACP.

duncan   January 29th, 2010 - 11:27 am

Reruns, is this the best Americas got?

thefedupamerican   January 29th, 2010 - 12:20 pm

I hope she does. THe more dissention in the Democrat Party the better as far as I’m concerned. As for our side, we need to support principled candidates who believe in AMERICAN values. Oh yeah, and he needs promise NOT TO BOW to foreign heads of state! No American apologists need to apply this time around! http://www.thefedupamerican.com

Helen Tomas   January 29th, 2010 - 12:22 pm

Duncan: On the Lib side it is…

myleftbrain   January 29th, 2010 - 12:22 pm

They’ll need someone to run, because Obama’s stock is dropping fast and he’s taking the party with him. It’s just a matter of time before they dump him, probably the middle of 2011 we’ll know his fate.

My wish is that they cling bitterly to his failed policies and go down in flames blaming Bush the whole time.

Kingkaiser   January 29th, 2010 - 12:24 pm

Wait a minute? How can they both run on the blame Bush policy? My God, Hillary may actually come out and say Obambo is a failure!
I’m officially supporting her candidacy now, though I’d never vote for her…

PALIN will be victorious   January 29th, 2010 - 12:30 pm

2012 will be a Clinton vs Palin and Palin will be the victorious one.
Clinton will get Dem-Primary but her history of supporting obama will
take her down.

ANYBODY v obama   January 29th, 2010 - 12:33 pm

polls show candidate-ANYBODY (just fillin the blank) will win over obama in 2012.
YUP, ITS THAT BAD FOR OBAMA.

teaLeaves   January 29th, 2010 - 12:34 pm

imagine the millions Americans threw away on obama only to be insulted by him?

Dave, Tn   January 29th, 2010 - 12:38 pm

Yeah like changing the head of this snake (Clinton’s old crew are running things now) would “change” anything.

tiredofit2010   January 29th, 2010 - 12:42 pm

just when I thought Jack was getting it, he reverts back to his stupidity again…No jack we don’t need a (by her own words) “modern progessive”….we need a Reagan Conservative who upholds the Constitution, is for small government, and is fiscally conservative!!! And is strong on our national defense!

PALIN WILL WIN   January 29th, 2010 - 12:49 pm

palin will be victorious over Clinton in 2012.

General Patton   January 29th, 2010 - 12:50 pm

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% JACK, THIS WOMAN is a GLOBALIST who has also SOLD-OUT your COUNTRY to THE U.N. and OFFSHORE BANKERS that are currently (trying) to implode the economy of America with the HELP of the FEDERAL RESERVE and the CURRENT CROP of POLITICAL VERMIN… We think you should RE-THINK your position of this TRAITOROUS female GLOBALIST that will take your COUNTRY to h%ll as fast OR FASTER than Barry currently is!!! PROOF> http://www.infowars.com AND http://www.republicbroadcasting.org CLICK LISTEN NOW for exactly what ELSE is being planned FOR YOU People and STAND UP to these pot-bellied vermin and TAKE your Country BACK!

Nuff Said   January 29th, 2010 - 12:58 pm

One problem there Jack, Obama ain’t no Lincoln. Very bad comparison. LOL comparing arguably our greatest president to an incompetent, adolescent, narcissist failure like B.H.O. Sorry it don’t fly. Maybe that’s why no one watches you. Get a clue.

ANY Democrat is going to lose in landslides in 2010 & 2012   January 29th, 2010 - 1:18 pm

The Democrats BETTER put someone up for nomination other than Obama. That way when the new Democrat loses, they may save embarrassment of a landslide. We all know a Democrat isn’t going to win the Presidency again for at least 4 generations, so you might as well make your failed attempt at it with someone different. After the first round of defeats for Democrats happens in 2010, the knock out punch will happen in 2012 and the Democrat party will split into factions, or even cease to exist.

Palin will take at least 60% of the vote   January 29th, 2010 - 1:21 pm

Even though Sarah Palin is going to win in 2012 with at least 60% of the vote, I’d rather see her kick Hillinsky’s a$$ than have to listen to another God awful BS campaign that has already started by Barak Failed Obama.

ain't gonna happen   January 29th, 2010 - 1:30 pm

She couldn’t win the general election because 99% of blacks would NEVER vote for her if she “betrayed” Obama by challenging him. She’d also be painted as the biggest racist in the history of the world. Democrats can’t win without the votes of all the groups they helped to marginalize (blacks, gays, Mexican immigrants) and that they work so hard to keep down so they’ll always think they have no other choice but to vote Democrat.

H2K   January 29th, 2010 - 1:39 pm

“Modern Progressive”? Sounds nice, but wasn’t Woodrow Wilson a disaster?

Mickey   January 29th, 2010 - 3:04 pm

I wanna hear more out O’Keefe and his connection to Breitbart.

myleftbrain   January 29th, 2010 - 4:18 pm

Mickey January 29th, 2010 – 3:04 pm
I wanna hear more out O’Keefe and his connection to Breitbart.

Wrong story, I know it’s hard for libs, but try harder. They have night school for all sorts of subjects, reading and comprehension is one of them.

Calvin   January 29th, 2010 - 8:40 pm

Absolutely Hillary is interested in becoming the president. Now rather than later in my opinion. Her problem is to look like a good soldier for Obama, not get caught up in a major scandal or *FU*, and then have a very public breakup where she looks like the honorable person. Nothing to it!
Domestic issues will not help or her this time. She is the Secretary of State. It has to be a national security or foreign policy issue. She made some rude comments about China a couple of weeks ago without a heads up from the White House. Wonder if Barry was let in on the action? The Clintons have always had a thing with China going back to the days in Little Rock with Charlie Trie and the Riadi brothers. Is China capable of humilating Obama and making Hillary look like a winner? You can bet on that. Barry, watch your back…

uberVU - social comments   January 30th, 2010 - 7:29 am

Social comments and analytics for this post…

This post was mentioned on Twitter by tasteofaz: Breitbart.tv Cafferty: I Hope Hillary Clinton Challenges Obama in 2012 http://tinyurl.com/ybhf2cn...

Ryan   February 18th, 2010 - 3:39 pm

HILLARY!!! YOU DUMBASSES DON’T KNOW HOW GREAT SHE IS!

Adeline M Garbie   February 19th, 2010 - 2:38 am

Run for President in 2012

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.