CA Cops Say Man Paid Teens to Spit in His Face

"Who knows how far this would have gone?"

November 21, 2009 at 1:03 am - KABC-TV
Dateline: Thousand Oaks, CA

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by The B-Cast and Jennifer, Monet. Monet said: RT @thebcast: CA Cops Say Man Paid Teens to Spit in His Face http://bit.ly/5yCr6a #tcot #thebcast [...]

Ha-Ha   November 21st, 2009 - 5:57 am

Sounds like a typical Democrat! Dangerous and sick!

anne can   November 21st, 2009 - 10:56 am

Ha-Ha Smartest thing you ever said!

james   November 22nd, 2009 - 12:13 am

The cops have nothing else better do.

Nasty 13   November 22nd, 2009 - 12:34 am

When I was a kid a Libtard use to pay me $50.00 to poop in his shoe.

jordin   November 22nd, 2009 - 1:44 am

This is illegal?

Maire   November 22nd, 2009 - 4:05 am

For those who don’t know, The spitting, urinating, defecating, and other forms of humiliation, are forms of BDSM (derived from the terms bondage and discipline, dominance and submission, sadism and masochism.)
For some strange people it is a form of fore play, a turn on. This guy is probably a pedophile into some weird stuff. My guess is, this was probably perpetuated on him when he was a teenager himself, and he is continuing the pattern of abuse.

duncan   November 22nd, 2009 - 7:11 am

Why didnt he go to Frisco?

Lbfent2   November 22nd, 2009 - 10:04 am

The man is is merely conditioning himself for Obamacare.

“15 counts of annoying a child”…? I’ve never heard of that charge. Is that just a Califoria thing? I can think of hundreds of people in my past who could’ve fit that profile.

jam   November 22nd, 2009 - 6:35 pm

You can’t just outlaw everything that could possibly be someone’s fetish, though. See Rule 36.

H2K   November 22nd, 2009 - 8:44 pm

There are some liberals in government that I’d spit in their face for free.

Chad   November 23rd, 2009 - 6:24 am

“Annoying a child” just sounds made up. I am annoyed every day by ignorant people who feel that they HAVE to talk on their cell phones while driving 10 miles under the posted speed limit. I do not recall anywhere in the constitution that states that you have the right to not be annoyed or offended. Now we are going to start arresting people for what they were thinking? This guy may be a perv, but he didnt do anything that is considered sexual.

RAM   November 23rd, 2009 - 9:21 am

I love those who would find a way to make this story into some sort of “liberals are evil” deal. (And I’m certainly not a liberal). These conservatives are simple minded to the point of being pathetic. Probably surprise folks to know that this guy was a religious conservative who campaigned against Gay Marriage.

Albert Poohole   November 23rd, 2009 - 12:19 pm

Thirty-one bucks is way too much to pay to be spitooned. Try the number two with a large coke.

To RAM   November 23rd, 2009 - 1:05 pm

Of course there is no way of knowing for sure if he is a liberal, but there is plenty of reason to associate deviant behavior with liberals. Championing a persons right to prey on minors is a cornerstone of liberal platforms. Even if this guy was a “religious conservative” he still fits the sexual profile of a liberal. What is really sick is that liberals wouldn’t rally to his side even though they agree with him on this issue simply because he is politically conservative. Liberals are truly evil.

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.