Breitbart.tv

Show the pictures you cowards! You’ll show alleged pictures of American atrocities but you don’t have the guts to show the reality of abortions. There are no suppositions in those images. Those images show the truth and you don’t want people to see or know the truth behind your support of infanticide. Murderers!

Jeff, the problem is that truth sometimes hurts especially when you have to face it. But I can see where “appropriateness” could come into play. I wouldn’t want a condom on a banana ad saying something like “Abstinence doesn’t always work” on the side of a bus and I understand this situation, conversely. Kids don’t need to see this wheeling down the highway. I agree with the premise just not the presentation.

Wow I thought Brietbart was a news organization that told the whole story!
Never mind I will just google ‘rolling fetus’ and get the whole story somewhere else!

Thanks anyway.

If there is nothing wrong with abortion and if the fetus is not a baby but just a grouping of cells, what is wrong with showing the image? I’ll tell you what is wrong with the image, it is a picture of a dead baby, and everyone who wants to kill their unborn baby wants the right to “pretend” they are not committing murder on an innocent child.

Now you cowards at CBS, go back to your sympathy story about the poor serial killer who is on death row, and how inhumane the death penalty is.

You are cowards in not showing the whole image. The shocking image will show a preborn human either in its oh so small human form or a mutilated body of a baby. Those in our midst who favor abortion would never ask their pregnant friend or relative, ‘How is the fetus doing?’ Rather ‘How is the baby doing?’ But we say we abort a ‘fetus’. Does something hypocritical about that?
Another angle for us to consider is to ask ourselves ‘ When really is a child viable?’ A case could be made that a child is not viable until 5 or 10 years of age, maybe older. If a parent does not feed, clothe, provide for hygiene issues, the child will die. So what could be said dispassionately about what range of age from conception to … that a child is really viable?
It is repeatedly stated that a fetus is ‘only a blob of tissue’. A blob reminds me of a handful of unshaped clay on a potters wheel or a pile of dough before it is made into a pie crust or bread. Those are true blobs. Can we in all honesty say a miniature form of a human is a blob? Really?
One might argue that the images on the truck in your news account were too graphic ? Such might be the case for young children. That is interesting because anything is available on the web or TV programming. Odd how our Congress found similar aborted images too offensive to be viewed by their adult eyes when abortion was debated some yrs ago.
Finally, can we honestly answer as to what is a viable age of a child?

Your ‘news’ article seems to be leaving out the critical part of the story. It is for this very reason that these groups use the tactics you will not show. “Choice” is a little hard to take when seen in reality.

And the problem you people are having with this billboard is? Isnt this what the femenists are yelling about? It is a womans right to kill her unborn child. But wait liberals are against capitol punishment Right. Where does a woman get the right to kill her unborn child? I dont see any thing in the constitution about that. Yea I know it is not there, a judge passed law and made a right It is wrong wrong wrong

On one hand, we are told we need to teach first and second grade children how to put on condoms,and expose them to all kind of sexual realism, with pictures of nudity and sexual perversion and explicit language, and yet we can’t allow them to see what a fetus looks like? Rediculous!

Ghoulish scenes are frequently depicted in children’s movies, on TV and in printed material, and naked anatomy is shown in public and in the media. So, why is the billboard image censored and blocked out for this newscast? Such hypocracy!

It is odd that people who want “freedom” for themselves would deprive others of the freedom to express an opinion, and then insist on being the “mind police” for others.

As if we shouldn’t show a starving child with the line “poverty.” The offense is not that one shows a 3-month old baby, but that its mere image creates guilt in those who would kill it. Killing it is apparently nothing but showing it is everything.

Post a Comment